Suppr超能文献

复杂胫骨平台骨折的治疗:伊利扎罗夫外固定方法联合或不联合微创内固定的对比研究

Management of complex tibial plateau fractures: A comparative study of Ilizarov external fixation method with or without minimal internal fixation.

作者信息

Korkmaz Murat, Kızılkurt Taha, Pehlivanoglu Tuna, Kahraman Abdullah, Balci Halil Ibrahim, Sen Cengiz

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, İstanbul University, İstanbul Medicine Faculty, İstanbul,Türkiye.

Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Bahçelievler Medicana Hospital, İstanbul-Türkiye.

出版信息

Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2025 Feb;31(2):194-201. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2024.25755.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Complex tibial plateau fractures present significant challenges due to severe articular comminution and soft tissue complications. There is still no consensus in the current literature regarding the optimal treatment for these fractures. This study aims to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of complex tibial plateau fractures treated with Ilizarov external fixation with or without minimal internal fixation.

METHODS

This retrospective study analyzed 62 patients with Schatzker type V or VI tibial plateau fractures, with a minimum follow-up duration of three years. Patients were divided into two groups: one treated with circular external fixation (Ilizarov method) combined with minimal internal fixation and the other treated with circular external fixation alone. Clinical, functional, and radiological outcomes were assessed, including knee range of motion (ROM), Knee Society Score (KSS), Kujala Score, and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score.

RESULTS

At the latest follow-up, Group 1 demonstrated better functional and clinical outcomes compared to Group 2. The mean knee range of motion in Group 1 was 116.56° versus 97.83° in Group 2 (p<0.05). Group 1 also had higher KSS scores (92.43 vs. 79.06) and Kujala Scores (94.75 vs. 90.6) and lower VAS scores (1.13 vs. 3.33) (all p<0.05). Flexion contracture and extension lag were significantly less prevalent in Group 1, with fewer cases and lower severity. Circular external fixators were removed earlier in Group 1 (120.43 days) compared to Group 2 (157.06 days) (p<0.05), with a lower incidence of delayed union in Group 1. Varus malalignment was also less frequent and less severe in Group 1. No major complications, such as neurovascular injuries, septic nonunion, or deep venous thrombosis, were reported in either group. Both groups exhibited similar rates of minor complications, primarily pin tract infections, which resolved with appropriate treatment.

CONCLUSION

Ilizarov external fixation, with or without minimal internal fixation, is an effective treatment method for complex tibial plateau fractures. However, patients in whom the joint was anatomically reduced demonstrated better anatomical reduction, improved range of motion, earlier weight-bearing, and enhanced functional recovery, highlighting the superiority of this approach. These findings support the recommendation of this combined technique as the preferred treatment for such challenging fractures.

摘要

背景

复杂胫骨平台骨折因严重的关节粉碎和软组织并发症而带来重大挑战。目前文献中对于这些骨折的最佳治疗方法仍未达成共识。本研究旨在评估采用伊里扎洛夫外固定结合或不结合微创内固定治疗复杂胫骨平台骨折的临床和影像学结果。

方法

本回顾性研究分析了62例Schatzker V型或VI型胫骨平台骨折患者,最短随访期为三年。患者分为两组:一组采用环形外固定(伊里扎洛夫方法)结合微创内固定治疗,另一组仅采用环形外固定治疗。评估临床、功能和影像学结果,包括膝关节活动范围(ROM)、膝关节协会评分(KSS)、库贾拉评分和视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分。

结果

在最近一次随访时,与第2组相比,第1组显示出更好的功能和临床结果。第1组的平均膝关节活动范围为116.56°,而第2组为97.83°(p<0.05)。第1组的KSS评分(92.43对79.06)和库贾拉评分(94.75对90.6)也更高,VAS评分更低(1.13对3.33)(均p<0.05)。第1组的屈曲挛缩和伸展滞后明显较少见,病例数和严重程度均较低。第1组的环形外固定器拆除时间(120.43天)早于第2组(157.06天)(p<0.05),第1组的骨不连发生率较低。第1组的内翻畸形也较少见且程度较轻。两组均未报告重大并发症,如神经血管损伤、感染性骨不连或深静脉血栓形成。两组的轻微并发症发生率相似,主要为针道感染,经适当治疗后可缓解。

结论

伊里扎洛夫外固定结合或不结合微创内固定是治疗复杂胫骨平台骨折的有效方法。然而,关节解剖复位的患者显示出更好的解剖复位、改善的活动范围、更早的负重和更好的功能恢复,突出了这种方法的优越性。这些发现支持推荐这种联合技术作为此类具有挑战性骨折的首选治疗方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d2b7/11843421/7a1527e25f08/TJTES-31-194-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验