Woodhead Charlotte, Morgan Amy, Sabra Ibrahim, Sabra Sara, Konieczka Lukasz, Knowles Gemma, Cunningham Emily, Dyrud Juliet, Elliott Liberty, Ige Lauren, Mascolo Angela, Singh E, Rimes Katharine A
ESRC Centre for Society and Mental Health, King's College London, Melbourne House, 44-46 Aldwych, London WC2B 4LL, United Kingdom; King's College London, Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, 16 De Crespigny Park, London SE5 8AF, United Kingdom.
ESRC Centre for Society and Mental Health, King's College London, Melbourne House, 44-46 Aldwych, London WC2B 4LL, United Kingdom; King's College London, Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, 16 De Crespigny Park, London SE5 8AF, United Kingdom.
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2025 Apr;254:104783. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.104783. Epub 2025 Feb 18.
There is limited intersectionality-informed, contextually diverse qualitative research on school experiences of LGBTQ+ students and links to mental health. Focusing on racialized, ethnic minority and religious/faith groups, this coproduced UK study examines how: 1) sexual and/or gender diverse students with intersecting minoritized identities experience school; 2) school environments could better support their mental health; and 3) what shapes school inclusion initiatives. In-depth interviews and focus groups were conducted with 22 staff members, 32 students (13-19 years), and nine LGBTQ+ school inclusion training providers. The sample was diverse across gender and sexual identity, race/ethnicity, religion and context. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis, identifying three themes (and subthemes): 1) "What's important is putting the young person first" ('Minority stress: it's more stressful for me', 'We're in this together but who's in charge?', 'Prioritising students' needs and lived reality'), 2) "Move beyond viewing religious beliefs and culture versus LGBTQ+ inclusion as a zero-sum game" ('Faith clashes?', 'Fears about going there maintain distance'), and 3) "We need to talk: engaging with parents and school communities" ('Credible messengers', 'Finding ways into the conversation'). Findings emphasize the importance of intersectional perspectives. Also, a need to acknowledge historic and current oppressions shaping current perspectives on gender and sexual diversity; reflexivity and intersubjectivity in communication with parents, students and communities; greater intersectional representation; and raised awareness and disruption of inequity-creating norms. This requires policy-level support, guidance and resourcing to avoid widening inequities on socio-economic grounds and to prepare students to live within a mutually tolerant society.
关于 LGBTQ+ 学生的学校经历及其与心理健康的联系,基于交叉性理论且结合不同背景的定性研究非常有限。这项英国合作开展的研究聚焦于种族化群体、少数族裔以及宗教/信仰群体,探讨了以下几个方面:1)具有交叉边缘化身份的性取向和/或性别多样化学生在学校的经历;2)学校环境如何能更好地支持他们的心理健康;3)是什么塑造了学校的包容举措。研究对 22 名教职员工、32 名学生(13 - 19 岁)以及 9 名 LGBTQ+ 学校包容培训提供者进行了深入访谈和焦点小组讨论。样本在性别、性取向、种族/族裔、宗教和背景方面具有多样性。研究采用反思性主题分析法对数据进行分析,确定了三个主题(及子主题):1)“重要的是把年轻人放在首位”(“少数群体压力:对我来说压力更大”,“我们同舟共济但谁来主导?”,“优先考虑学生的需求和生活现实”),2)“超越将宗教信仰和文化与 LGBTQ+ 包容视为非此即彼的零和博弈”(“信仰冲突?”。“对前往那里的恐惧导致保持距离”),3)“我们需要对话:与家长和学校社区互动”(“可信的信使”,“找到参与对话的方式”)。研究结果强调了交叉性视角的重要性。此外,有必要认识到历史和当前的压迫塑造了当前对性别和性取向多样性的看法;在与家长、学生和社区沟通时要有反思性和主体间性;要有更多的交叉性代表性;提高对造成不平等的规范的认识并加以打破。这需要政策层面的支持、指导和资源投入,以避免在社会经济层面扩大不平等,并让学生为生活在一个相互包容的社会做好准备。