Kim Jeongsoo, Cha Joon, Choi Sheung Nyoung, Heo Gang, Yoo Yongjae, Moon Jee Youn
From the Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
University of South Florida, Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, Florida.
Anesth Analg. 2025 Mar 1;140(3):665-674. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000007014. Epub 2024 Jul 25.
Stellate ganglion block (SGB) is a type of sympathetic block used to relieve pain in the face and upper extremities. However, its effectiveness can be limited by the presence of Kuntz fibers that bypass the stellate ganglion. Thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) offers an alternative in such cases. We hypothesized that ultrasound (US)-guided TPVB would provide a higher success rate of upper extremity sympathetic blockade than US-guided SGB. Therefore, this prospective randomized study aimed to compare the technical success rates between US-guided TPVB and US-guided SGB and assess clinical outcomes in alleviating upper extremity pain.
Patients aged 19 to 85 years diagnosed with chronic upper extremity pain (complex regional pain syndrome and neuropathic pain) were randomly assigned to either the US-guided TPVB group, where they received a 10 mL injection of 1% mepivacaine in the T2 paravertebral space, or the US-guided SGB group, where they received a 5 mL injection of 1% mepivacaine at the C6 level. The primary outcome was the success rate (%) of sympathetic blockade, which was predefined as the difference in temperature change between affected and unaffected hands 20 minutes after the procedure (ΔT difference) of ≥ 1.5°C. Secondary outcomes included comparisons of the ΔT difference (°C), differences in peak systolic velocities (cm/s) of the ipsilateral brachial artery at 20 minutes, and pain intensity at baseline and 20 minutes, 1 week, and 4 weeks after the procedure using an 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS) pain score.
The TPVB group (N = 22/35, 62.9%) showed a higher success rate than the SGB group (N = 13/34, 38.2%; P = .041) in achieving the primary outcome of sympathetic blockade at 20 minutes. The difference in success rates between the 2 groups was 24.6 % (95% confidence interval [CI], -9.0% to 58.2%). The ΔT difference was significantly higher in TPVB than in SGB (2.0°C ±1.5 and 1.1°C ±1.3, respectively; P = .008). The peak systolic velocities at 20 minutes increased in TPVB (P = .005), which was not observed in SGB (P = .325). Pain intensity decreased in both groups 20 minutes after injection (P < .001 in each group), and the TPVB group showed a lower 11-point NRS pain score compared to the SGB group (4.3 ± 2.2 and 5.4 ± 2.4, respectively; P = .038). Pain intensity scores increased to preintervention levels in both groups at 1 week and 4 weeks after the interventions.
US-guided TPVB had a higher success rate of upper extremity sympathetic blockade than US-guided SGB, with more pronounced immediate postprocedural pain relief.
星状神经节阻滞(SGB)是一种用于缓解面部和上肢疼痛的交感神经阻滞方法。然而,其效果可能会受到绕过星状神经节的Kuntz纤维的限制。在这种情况下,胸段椎旁阻滞(TPVB)提供了一种替代方法。我们假设超声(US)引导下的TPVB在上肢交感神经阻滞方面比US引导下的SGB成功率更高。因此,这项前瞻性随机研究旨在比较US引导下的TPVB和US引导下的SGB的技术成功率,并评估缓解上肢疼痛的临床结果。
年龄在19至85岁之间、被诊断为慢性上肢疼痛(复杂性区域疼痛综合征和神经性疼痛)的患者被随机分配到US引导下的TPVB组,在该组中,他们在T2椎旁间隙接受10 mL 1%甲哌卡因注射;或US引导下的SGB组,在该组中,他们在C6水平接受5 mL 1%甲哌卡因注射。主要结局是交感神经阻滞的成功率(%),其被预先定义为术后20分钟患侧和未患侧手部温度变化的差值(ΔT差值)≥1.5°C。次要结局包括ΔT差值(°C)的比较、术后20分钟同侧肱动脉收缩期峰值速度(cm/s)的差异,以及使用11点数字评分量表(NRS)疼痛评分评估术前、术后20分钟、1周和4周时的疼痛强度。
在20分钟时实现交感神经阻滞主要结局方面,TPVB组(N = 22/35,62.9%)的成功率高于SGB组(N = 13/34,38.2%;P = 0.041)。两组成功率的差异为24.6%(95%置信区间[CI],-9.0%至58.2%)。TPVB组的ΔT差值显著高于SGB组(分别为2.0°C±1.5和1.1°C±1.3;P = 0.008)。TPVB组术后20分钟收缩期峰值速度增加(P = 0.005),而SGB组未观察到这种情况(P = 0.325)。两组注射后20分钟疼痛强度均降低(每组P < 0.001),与SGB组相比,TPVB组的11点NRS疼痛评分更低(分别为4.3±2.2和5.4±2.4;P = 0.038)。干预后1周和4周,两组疼痛强度评分均回升至干预前水平。
US引导下的TPVB在上肢交感神经阻滞方面比US引导下的SGB成功率更高,术后即时疼痛缓解更明显。