Ciorli Tommaso, Pia Lorenzo, Stein Timo
SAMBA (SpAtial, Motor and Bodily Awareness) Research Group, Department of Psychology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Brain and Cognition, Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Conscious Cogn. 2025 Mar;129:103830. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2025.103830. Epub 2025 Feb 19.
Breaking continuous flash suppression (bCFS) is a widely used experimental paradigm that exploits detection tasks to measure the time an invisible stimulus requires to access awareness. Oneunresolved issue is whether differences in detection times reflect unconscious or conscious processing. To answer this question, here we introduce a novel approach (reverse-bCFS [rev-bCFS]) that measures the time an initially visible stimulus requires to be suppressed from awareness. Results from two experiments using face stimuli indicate that rev-bCFS can capture conscious effects, which indicates that contrasting standard bCFS with rev-bCFS can isolate unconscious processing occurring specifically during bCFS. For example, while face inversion impacted both bCFS and rev-bCFS, effects were larger in bCFS, suggesting a distinct contribution of unconscious processing to the advantage of upright over inverted faces in accessing awareness. Combining standard bCFS and rev-bCFS may offer a fruitful approach to disentangle conscious and unconscious effects occurring during interocular suppression.
打破连续闪光抑制(bCFS)是一种广泛使用的实验范式,它利用检测任务来测量不可见刺激进入意识所需的时间。一个未解决的问题是检测时间的差异反映的是无意识还是有意识的加工。为了回答这个问题,我们在此引入一种新方法(反向bCFS [rev-bCFS]),该方法测量最初可见的刺激从意识中被抑制所需的时间。使用面部刺激的两个实验结果表明,rev-bCFS可以捕捉到有意识的效应,这表明将标准bCFS与rev-bCFS进行对比可以分离出在bCFS期间特别发生的无意识加工。例如,虽然面部倒置对bCFS和rev-bCFS都有影响,但在bCFS中影响更大,这表明无意识加工对正立面孔相对于倒置面孔在进入意识方面的优势有独特贡献。结合标准bCFS和rev-bCFS可能为解开双眼抑制期间发生的有意识和无意识效应提供一种富有成效的方法。