Suppr超能文献

阿哌沙班与华法林治疗重度肾功能不全患者静脉血栓栓塞症的多中心研究。

Apixaban versus warfarin for treatment of venous thromboembolism in patients with severe renal impairment: a multicenter study.

作者信息

Hanke Paige, Domingo Ma Emmanuelle, Salanio Ghenella, Ahmed Kulsoom, Hu Jingyu, Hendricks Kristin, Howard Jacob, Hashimura Tori, Guiliano Chris, Haan Bradley J, Ng Tsz Hin, Kelley Denise, Knight Tamara, Koopman Kathleen, Obstoj Monika, Breeden Thomas, Sirbu Dumitru, Romano Meredith, Harpenau Andrew, Konneker Rebecca, Acevedo Jason, Pan Neil, Edwin Stephanie B

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, Ascension St. John Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA.

Department of Pharmacy, Ascension Dell Seton Medical Center, Austin, TX, USA.

出版信息

J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2025 Mar;58(3):380-390. doi: 10.1007/s11239-025-03075-5. Epub 2025 Feb 22.

Abstract

Limited evidence exists regarding the use of factor Xa inhibitors for the treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with severe renal impairment. Notably, these patients were excluded from clinical trials.The goal of this study was to examine the safety and effectiveness of apixaban versus warfarin for the treatment of acute VTE in patients with severe renal impairment.This retrospective cohort study was conducted across 36 Ascension Health sites between 2014 and 2024. Adult patients receiving apixaban or warfarin for VTE treatment with severe renal impairment were included. The primary outcome was time to composite bleeding event within six months.This study included 1200 patients receiving apixaban and 600 patients receiving warfarin. Overall, 23.4% of the study population had ESRD requiring renal replacement therapy. Among patients not requiring renal replacement therapy, stage IV CKD was most common (43.8%). No difference in time to composite bleeding events (HR 1.01; 95% CI 0.74-1.38, p = 0.97) or recurrent VTE (HR 1.24; 95% CI 0.70-2.18, p = 0.46) were noted after controlling for confounders. Furthermore, major bleeding (4.7% vs. 7.5%, p = 0.43) and clinically-relevant non-major bleeding (4.3% vs. 6.2%, p = 0.08) were similar between groups. Apixaban was associated with a significantly reduced incidence of anticoagulation-related ED admission (6.8% vs. 9.8%, p = 0.02) compared to warfarin. Anticoagulation-related readmission (7.4% vs. 8%, p = 0.66) and time to all-cause mortality (5.2% vs. 6.2%, p = 0.38) were similar between groups.No differences in safety or effectiveness were noted between apixaban and warfarin, providing encouraging evidence to support the use of apixaban for treatment of acute VTE in patients with severe renal impairment.

摘要

关于在严重肾功能损害患者中使用Xa因子抑制剂治疗静脉血栓栓塞症(VTE)的证据有限。值得注意的是,这些患者被排除在临床试验之外。本研究的目的是检验阿哌沙班与华法林治疗严重肾功能损害患者急性VTE的安全性和有效性。这项回顾性队列研究于2014年至2024年在36个阿森松医疗中心进行。纳入了因严重肾功能损害接受阿哌沙班或华法林治疗VTE的成年患者。主要结局是6个月内发生复合出血事件的时间。本研究纳入了1200例接受阿哌沙班治疗的患者和600例接受华法林治疗的患者。总体而言,23.4%的研究人群患有需要肾脏替代治疗的终末期肾病(ESRD)。在不需要肾脏替代治疗的患者中,IV期慢性肾脏病最为常见(43.8%)。在控制混杂因素后,复合出血事件发生时间(风险比[HR]1.01;95%置信区间[CI]0.74 - 1.38,p = 0.97)或复发性VTE(HR 1.24;95% CI 0.70 - 2.18,p = 0.46)没有差异。此外,两组之间的大出血(4.7%对7.5%,p = 0.43)和临床相关非大出血(4.3%对6.2%,p = 0.08)相似。与华法林相比,阿哌沙班与抗凝相关的急诊入院发生率显著降低(6.8%对9.8%,p = 0.02)。两组之间抗凝相关的再入院率(7.4%对8%,p = 0.66)和全因死亡时间(5.2%对6.2%,p = 0.38)相似。阿哌沙班和华法林在安全性或有效性方面没有差异,为支持在严重肾功能损害患者中使用阿哌沙班治疗急性VTE提供了令人鼓舞的证据。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验