Suppr超能文献

早二叠世发现的另一种被子植物?

: Another Angiosperm Seen in the Early Permian?

作者信息

Wang Xin, Lei Yinggang, Fu Qiang

机构信息

State Key Laboratory of Palaeobiology and Stratigraphy, Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology and CAS Center for Excellence in Life and Paleoenvironment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008, China.

School of Materials Science and Engineering, Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang 471000, China.

出版信息

Life (Basel). 2025 Feb 12;15(2):286. doi: 10.3390/life15020286.

Abstract

"How old are angiosperms" is a frequently asked but still unanswered question. Although the underlying reason includes a lack of consensus on the criterion for fossil angiosperms, limited fossil finds, and other factors, the final answer to the question apparently lies in fossils, not wrangling among different schools. The currently mainstream idea in palaeobotany is that angiosperms cannot have existed earlier than the Early Cretaceous. This 64-year-old stereotype was recently iterated again in 2017. However, another hard-to-ignore fact is that this view is challenged by increasing pre-Cretaceous fossil evidence of angiosperms as well as molecular clock estimates. Here, we report a Permian angiosperm, gen. nov. from Henan Province, China. This fossil plant has enclosed ovules, a defining feature idiosyncratic of angiosperms. In addition, a conspicuous style is seen on the top of the ovary, underscoring its distinction from known fossil seeds in gymnosperms. The combination of the Permian (Palaeozoic) age and these two unique features of indicates that angiosperms first appeared much earlier than widely accepted, implying a much longer history of flowering plants. The occurrence of four specimens preserved in various states and unique morphology of are beyond the expectations of all known theories on plant evolution, shedding new light on a previously unknown aspect of plant evolution in geological history.

摘要

“被子植物起源于何时”是一个常被问到却仍无定论的问题。尽管根本原因包括对被子植物化石的判别标准缺乏共识、化石发现有限以及其他因素,但这个问题的最终答案显然在于化石,而非各学派之间的争论。古植物学目前的主流观点是,被子植物不可能早于白垩纪早期就已存在。这个有64年历史的固有观念在2017年再次被重申。然而,另一个不容忽视的事实是,这种观点正受到越来越多的白垩纪之前被子植物化石证据以及分子钟估算结果的挑战。在此,我们报道一种来自中国河南省的二叠纪被子植物新属。这种化石植物具有包被的胚珠,这是被子植物特有的一个决定性特征。此外,在子房顶部可见明显的花柱,这突出了它与裸子植物中已知化石种子的区别。二叠纪(古生代)的年代以及这两个独特特征表明,被子植物首次出现的时间比广泛接受的时间要早得多,这意味着开花植物的历史要长得多。四个保存状态各异的标本的出现以及独特的形态超出了所有已知植物进化理论的预期,为地质历史中植物进化一个此前未知的方面带来了新的启示。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/520f/11856813/545e74fe19dd/life-15-00286-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验