一项前瞻性、随机、开放标签、平行组比较临床试验,旨在评估草药口服胶囊与直肠给药联合使用对改善患有慢性肾脏病(CKD)的2型糖尿病患者肠道健康的安全性和有效性。
A prospective, randomized, open label, parallel group, comparative clinical trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of combination of herbal oral capsule and rectal medication to improve gut health of type 2 diabetic patients having chronic kidney disease (CKD).
作者信息
Patankar Suresh, Gorde Anupama, Patankar Sagar, Raje Rajesh, Devanpally Chandu, Ausekar Pranjal, Patil Gaurav, Chitale Shraddha
机构信息
Ace Hospital and Research Centre, ASP Medical Foundation, Pune -411 004 (MS) India; Shripad Medisearch Pvt. Ltd., Pune, India; Dept. of Integrative Medicine - Maharashtra University of Health Sciences, Nashik, India; Aarogya Bharati, India.
Ace Hospital and Research Centre, ASP Medical Foundation, Pune -411 004 (MS) India; Sinhgad Dental College and Hospital, Pune, India.
出版信息
J Ayurveda Integr Med. 2025 Mar-Apr;16(2):100992. doi: 10.1016/j.jaim.2024.100992. Epub 2025 Feb 28.
BACKGROUND
Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a major health concern globally, with more than 850 million people suffering from it. Several studies have been carried out to reduce inflammation in CKD patients; and to study the relationship between gut microbiota and inflammation.
OBJECTIVE
The effect of herbal formulations to improve the gut flora and reduce inflammation has not been studied earlier. The study aims to evaluate effect of herbal formulation combined with standard of care (SOC) treatment compared to SOC.
METHODS
A prospective, randomized, parallel group clinical trial was planned on 90 patients split equally into standard of care (SOC) with herbal treatment (IP) and only SOC groups. The change in the abdominal pain score, percent change in the pathogenic and non-pathogenic microbiome were the key endpoints of interest. The safety assessment was in terms of adverse events, changes in hematological and biochemical parameters.
RESULTS
The demographic and other patient characteristics showed statistically non-significant differences between two groups. On day 90, the median abdominal score in SOC + IP group (2.00) was significantly lower than that of SOC group (3.00) (p = 0.002). The quality of life score improved significantly in SOC + IP group (p < 0.001), unlike SOC group. There was significant reduction in pathogenic microbes in SOC + IP group; however, the reduction in non-pathogenic microbes was non-significant in this group. The adverse events (AEs) were in mild form, and the proportion of patients with AEs differed non-significantly between two groups.
CONCLUSION
The IP supplementation along with SOC significantly improved the GUT micro flora, and improved the overall quality of life of CKD patients. This treatment combination can be practiced for effective patient management.
背景
慢性肾脏病(CKD)是全球主要的健康问题,超过8.5亿人受其影响。已经开展了多项研究以减轻CKD患者的炎症,并研究肠道微生物群与炎症之间的关系。
目的
草药配方改善肠道菌群和减轻炎症的效果此前尚未得到研究。本研究旨在评估与标准治疗(SOC)相比,草药配方联合标准治疗(SOC)的效果。
方法
计划对90名患者进行一项前瞻性、随机、平行组临床试验,将患者平均分为接受草药治疗(IP)的标准治疗(SOC)组和仅接受SOC的组。腹痛评分的变化、致病和非致病微生物群的百分比变化是主要的观察终点。安全性评估依据不良事件、血液学和生化参数的变化。
结果
两组之间的人口统计学和其他患者特征在统计学上无显著差异。在第90天,SOC + IP组的中位腹痛评分(2.00)显著低于SOC组(3.00)(p = 0.002)。与SOC组不同,SOC + IP组的生活质量评分显著提高(p < 0.001)。SOC + IP组的致病微生物显著减少;然而,该组中非致病微生物的减少不显著。不良事件(AE)为轻度,两组中发生AE的患者比例无显著差异。
结论
IP联合SOC显著改善了肠道微生物群,并提高了CKD患者的整体生活质量。这种治疗组合可用于有效的患者管理。