• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

嗜碱性粒细胞计数与妊娠期糖尿病风险的双样本孟德尔随机化研究

A Two-Sample Mendelian Randomization Study of Basophil Count and Risk of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus.

作者信息

Mao Jing, Gan Yanqiong, Tan Xinlin, He Yuhan, Jing Qiao, Shi Qi

机构信息

Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Int J Womens Health. 2025 Feb 26;17:517-527. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S500632. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.2147/IJWH.S500632
PMID:40028461
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11872098/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

High basophil count levels are associated with an increased risk of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). We used two-sample Mendelian randomisation (MR) to explore a potential causal relationship. It also aims to offer genetic evidence supporting the link between basophil count and the development of gestational diabetes mellitus while addressing the potential issues of confounding and reverse causality commonly encountered in observational studies.

METHODS

We utilized publically accessible summary information obtained from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) for conducting a two-sample Mendelian randomization (TSMR) study. The major analysis method employed was inverse variance weighted (IVW), whereas the other four methods, namely weighted median method, MR-Egger regression, simple model and weighted model, were used as supplemental analyses. We also investigated the relationship between GDM and basophil count in the opposite direction using directional validation of MR analysis. Furthermore, the R package "ClusterProfiler" to conduct an analysis of Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways and Gene Ontology (GO) terms was used. Additionally, with the help of the STRING database, we have constructed a network of protein-protein interactions (PPIs).

RESULTS

The Inverse Variance Weighted (IVW) method revealed a significant causal association between basophil count and gestational diabetes mellitus (OR, 0.84; 95% CI; 0.74-0.96; P, 0.01). A sensitivity analysis was performed to assess the reliability of the results, indicating no indication of pleiotropy or heterogeneity, hence strengthening the validity of the findings. The reverse causation of GDM predisposition on basophil counts was not supported by the results of the directional validation of the MR analysis.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study showed a causal relationship between high basophil counts and increased risk of GDM but did not support a causal relationship between genetic susceptibility to GDM and basophil counts.

摘要

目的

高嗜碱性粒细胞计数水平与妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)风险增加相关。我们采用两样本孟德尔随机化(MR)方法来探究潜在的因果关系。其目的还在于提供遗传证据,支持嗜碱性粒细胞计数与妊娠期糖尿病发生之间的联系,同时解决观察性研究中常见的混杂和反向因果关系等潜在问题。

方法

我们利用从全基因组关联研究(GWAS)获得的公开汇总信息进行两样本孟德尔随机化(TSMR)研究。主要采用的分析方法是逆方差加权(IVW),而其他四种方法,即加权中位数法、MR-Egger回归、简单模型和加权模型,用作补充分析。我们还通过MR分析的方向性验证来研究GDM与嗜碱性粒细胞计数相反方向的关系。此外,使用R包“ClusterProfiler”对京都基因与基因组百科全书(KEGG)通路和基因本体(GO)术语进行分析。另外,借助STRING数据库,我们构建了蛋白质-蛋白质相互作用(PPI)网络。

结果

逆方差加权(IVW)方法显示嗜碱性粒细胞计数与妊娠期糖尿病之间存在显著的因果关联(OR,0.84;95%CI:0.74 - 0.96;P,0.01)。进行了敏感性分析以评估结果的可靠性,表明没有多效性或异质性迹象,从而加强了研究结果的有效性。MR分析的方向性验证结果不支持GDM易感性对嗜碱性粒细胞计数的反向因果关系。

结论

本研究结果表明高嗜碱性粒细胞计数与GDM风险增加之间存在因果关系,但不支持GDM遗传易感性与嗜碱性粒细胞计数之间的因果关系。

相似文献

1
A Two-Sample Mendelian Randomization Study of Basophil Count and Risk of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus.嗜碱性粒细胞计数与妊娠期糖尿病风险的双样本孟德尔随机化研究
Int J Womens Health. 2025 Feb 26;17:517-527. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S500632. eCollection 2025.
2
Investigating the causal impact of polycystic ovary syndrome on gestational diabetes mellitus: a two-sample Mendelian randomization study.探究多囊卵巢综合征对妊娠期糖尿病的因果影响:一项两样本孟德尔随机化研究。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024 Feb 5;15:1337562. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1337562. eCollection 2024.
3
Vitamin D and Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in the IEU OpenGWAS Project: A Two-Sample Bidirectional Mendelian Randomization Study.维生素 D 与 IEU 开放 GWAS 项目中的妊娠糖尿病:两样本双向 Mendelian 随机研究。
Nutrients. 2024 Aug 24;16(17):2836. doi: 10.3390/nu16172836.
4
Causal association between vitamin D and gestational diabetes mellitus: a two-sample Mendelian randomization study.维生素 D 与妊娠期糖尿病之间的因果关系:两样本孟德尔随机化研究。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2024 Dec;37(1):2427760. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2024.2427760. Epub 2024 Nov 17.
5
Genetic Causal Relationship Between Alanine Aminotransferase Levels and Risk of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: Mendelian Randomization Analysis Based on Two Samples.基于两样本的丙氨酸氨基转移酶水平与妊娠期糖尿病发病风险的遗传因果关系:孟德尔随机化分析。
Twin Res Hum Genet. 2024 Apr;27(2):80-84. doi: 10.1017/thg.2024.16. Epub 2024 Apr 18.
6
The causal relationship between immune cells and different kidney diseases: A Mendelian randomization study.免疫细胞与不同肾脏疾病之间的因果关系:一项孟德尔随机化研究。
Open Med (Wars). 2023 Dec 20;18(1):20230877. doi: 10.1515/med-2023-0877. eCollection 2023.
7
[Genetic Causation Analysis of Hyperandrogenemia Testing Indicators and Preeclampsia].[高雄激素血症检测指标与子痫前期的遗传因果关系分析]
Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2024 May 20;55(3):566-573. doi: 10.12182/20240560106.
8
25-Hydroxyvitamin D, Vitamin D Binding Protein and Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Two-Sample Mendelian Randomization Study.25-羟维生素 D、维生素 D 结合蛋白与妊娠糖尿病:两样本孟德尔随机研究。
Nutrients. 2024 Aug 7;16(16):2603. doi: 10.3390/nu16162603.
9
Investigating causal associations among gut microbiota, gut microbiota-derived metabolites, and gestational diabetes mellitus: a bidirectional Mendelian randomization study.探讨肠道微生物群、肠道微生物群衍生代谢物与妊娠期糖尿病之间的因果关系:一项双向孟德尔随机研究。
Aging (Albany NY). 2023 Aug 23;15(16):8345-8366. doi: 10.18632/aging.204973.
10
Causal relationship between gestational diabetes and preeclampsia: A bidirectional mendelian randomization analysis.妊娠期糖尿病与子痫前期的因果关系:双向孟德尔随机化分析。
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2024 Apr;210:111643. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2024.111643. Epub 2024 Mar 26.

本文引用的文献

1
Upregulation of MMPs in placentas of patients with gestational diabetes mellitus: Involvement of the PI3K/Akt pathway.妊娠期糖尿病患者胎盘基质金属蛋白酶的上调:PI3K/Akt信号通路的作用。
Heliyon. 2024 Jun 7;10(12):e32518. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e32518. eCollection 2024 Jun 30.
2
Repression of SMAD3 by STAT3 and c-Ski induces conventional dendritic cell differentiation.STAT3 和 c-Ski 抑制 SMAD3 诱导常规树突状细胞分化。
Life Sci Alliance. 2024 Jul 3;7(9). doi: 10.26508/lsa.201900581. Print 2024 Sep.
3
Research progress on the STAT signaling pathway in pregnancy and pregnancy-associated disorders.
STAT 信号通路在妊娠及妊娠相关疾病中的研究进展。
Front Immunol. 2024 Jan 3;14:1331964. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1331964. eCollection 2023.
4
2. Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2024.2. 糖尿病的诊断与分类:《2024年糖尿病医疗护理标准》
Diabetes Care. 2024 Jan 1;47(Suppl 1):S20-S42. doi: 10.2337/dc24-S002.
5
miR-3934 regulates the apoptosis and secretion of inflammatory cytokines of basophils via targeting RAGE in asthma.微小RNA-3934通过靶向晚期糖基化终末产物受体调控哮喘中嗜碱性粒细胞的凋亡及炎性细胞因子分泌。
Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2022 Aug 4;18(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s13223-022-00704-z.
6
Role of Basophils in a Broad Spectrum of Disorders.嗜碱性粒细胞在广泛疾病谱中的作用。
Front Immunol. 2022 May 27;13:902494. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.902494. eCollection 2022.
7
Phenotypic Causal Inference Using Genome-Wide Association Study Data: Mendelian Randomization and Beyond.基于全基因组关联研究数据的表型因果推断:孟德尔随机化及其拓展。
Annu Rev Biomed Data Sci. 2022 Aug 10;5:1-17. doi: 10.1146/annurev-biodatasci-122120-024910. Epub 2022 Apr 1.
8
Role of TGF-Beta Signaling in Beta Cell Proliferation and Function in Diabetes.转化生长因子-β信号在糖尿病β细胞增殖和功能中的作用
Biomolecules. 2022 Feb 26;12(3):373. doi: 10.3390/biom12030373.
9
Targeting CDK4/6 for Anticancer Therapy.靶向细胞周期蛋白依赖性激酶4/6进行抗癌治疗。
Biomedicines. 2022 Mar 16;10(3):685. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines10030685.
10
The possible involvement of circRNA DMNT1/p53/JAK/STAT in gestational diabetes mellitus and preeclampsia.环状RNA DMNT1/p53/JAK/STAT在妊娠期糖尿病和子痫前期中的可能作用
Cell Death Discov. 2022 Mar 16;8(1):121. doi: 10.1038/s41420-022-00913-w.