• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

采用改良庞塞蒂方法进行更短时间的夜间夹板固定,足部功能及与健康相关的生活质量相似。

Shorter Night Splinting by a Modified Ponseti Method With Similar Foot-Function and Health-Related Quality of Life.

作者信息

Seidel Angela, Tinembart Severine, Kaiser Nadine, Ziebarth Kai

机构信息

Departement of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, CHE.

Department of Pediatric Surgery, Inselspital, University of Berne, Berne, CHE.

出版信息

Cureus. 2025 Mar 8;17(3):e80260. doi: 10.7759/cureus.80260. eCollection 2025 Mar.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.80260
PMID:40061846
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11890394/
Abstract

Background The Ponseti method is the most frequent method for clubfoot treatment. It includes a six-year night-splinting period, which is difficult to comply with. The objective of this study is to evaluate the clinical outcomes, recurrence rates, and patient-reported health-related quality of life following a modified Ponseti method with reduced night splinting duration. Methods We analyzed 107 children (77 boys, 30 girls, 152 clubfeet) who were treated for idiopathic clubfoot from January 1994 to January 2015. The initial treatment started at a mean age of 9.2 days. Long-leg Soft Casts TM3 were applied until the desired position of the foot was achieved. At a mean age of 3.2 months, the residual deformity was corrected surgically. We assessed the clinical outcome by chart review and the functional outcome by a questionnaire that included the disease specific instrument (DSI) and the health-related quality of life assessed by the pediatric quality of life inventory (PedsQL™).  Results In 101 patients (92.7%) and 142 feet (93.4%), we had a clinical follow-up at a mean age of 7.39±4.9 years. A Denise Brown splint or a unilateral orthosis was applied for a mean period of 7.8±4.8 months over the whole day and an additional 17.3 ±16.3) nights only. At a mean follow-up of 10.0±SD 6.2 years, 82.2% of patients returned the questionnaires. The mean DSI was 74.8±17.5. The mean overall PedsQL™ was 87.8±12.6. The PedsQL™ functional component score showed a mean of 89.4±5.6, and the PedsQL™ social component score a mean of 86.9±13.5. Ten (9.3%) patients had a bilateral, and 18 (16.8%) patients had a unilateral relapse. Conclusions Achilles tendon lengthening (ATL) and limited posterior release, followed by a reduced period of splinting of 2.1 years, provide similar results compared to the original Ponseti method.

摘要

背景

庞塞蒂方法是治疗马蹄内翻足最常用的方法。它包括一个为期六年的夜间支具治疗期,这很难坚持。本研究的目的是评估采用缩短夜间支具佩戴时间的改良庞塞蒂方法后的临床疗效、复发率以及患者报告的与健康相关的生活质量。方法:我们分析了1994年1月至2015年1月期间接受特发性马蹄内翻足治疗的107名儿童(77名男孩,30名女孩,152只患足)。初始治疗开始时的平均年龄为9.2天。应用长腿软石膏TM3直至达到足部的理想位置。在平均年龄3.2个月时,通过手术矫正残余畸形。我们通过病历回顾评估临床疗效,通过一份问卷评估功能疗效,该问卷包括疾病特异性工具(DSI)以及通过儿童生活质量量表(PedsQL™)评估的与健康相关的生活质量。结果:101名患者(92.7%)和142只患足(93.4%)在平均年龄7.39±4.9岁时接受了临床随访。丹妮丝·布朗支具或单侧矫形器全天平均佩戴7.8±4.8个月,仅额外佩戴17.3±16.3个夜晚。在平均随访10.0±标准差6.2年时,82.2%的患者返回了问卷。DSI的平均值为74.8±17.5。PedsQL™的总体平均值为87.8±于12.6。PedsQL™功能成分得分的平均值为89.4±5.6,PedsQL™社会成分得分的平均值为86.9±±13.5。10名(9.3%)患者出现双侧复发,18名(16.8%)患者出现单侧复发。结论:与原始庞塞蒂方法相比,跟腱延长术(ATL)和有限的后路松解术,随后将支具佩戴时间缩短至2.1年,可提供相似的结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f922/11890394/47337f658b6b/cureus-0017-00000080260-i04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f922/11890394/2a551edfda53/cureus-0017-00000080260-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f922/11890394/75d6817d0238/cureus-0017-00000080260-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f922/11890394/8d15739d32f0/cureus-0017-00000080260-i03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f922/11890394/47337f658b6b/cureus-0017-00000080260-i04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f922/11890394/2a551edfda53/cureus-0017-00000080260-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f922/11890394/75d6817d0238/cureus-0017-00000080260-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f922/11890394/8d15739d32f0/cureus-0017-00000080260-i03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f922/11890394/47337f658b6b/cureus-0017-00000080260-i04.jpg

相似文献

1
Shorter Night Splinting by a Modified Ponseti Method With Similar Foot-Function and Health-Related Quality of Life.采用改良庞塞蒂方法进行更短时间的夜间夹板固定,足部功能及与健康相关的生活质量相似。
Cureus. 2025 Mar 8;17(3):e80260. doi: 10.7759/cureus.80260. eCollection 2025 Mar.
2
[Analysis of the efficacy of the Ponseti method for treatment of secondary clubfoot in young children with tethered cord syndrome].[庞塞蒂方法治疗脊髓拴系综合征幼儿继发性马蹄内翻足的疗效分析]
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Dec 1;58(12):942-946. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112139-20200728-00590.
3
Mid-term results of Ponseti method for the treatment of congenital idiopathic clubfoot--(a study of 67 clubfeet with mean five year follow-up).潘塞提(Ponseti)方法治疗先天性特发性马蹄内翻足的中期疗效——(67 例马蹄内翻足平均随访 5 年的研究)。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2011 Jan 12;6:3. doi: 10.1186/1749-799X-6-3.
4
Long-term outcomes of the Ponseti method for treatment of clubfoot: a systematic review.潘塞提方法治疗马蹄足的长期疗效:系统评价。
Int Orthop. 2021 Oct;45(10):2599-2608. doi: 10.1007/s00264-021-05189-w. Epub 2021 Aug 20.
5
Comparison of surgeon and physiotherapist-directed Ponseti treatment of idiopathic clubfoot.外科医生与物理治疗师主导的先天性马蹄内翻足潘塞缇疗法对比
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 May;91(5):1101-8. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.H.00178.
6
A comparison of ankle foot orthoses with foot abduction orthoses to prevent recurrence following correction of idiopathic clubfoot by the Ponseti method.比较踝足矫形器与足部外展矫形器在经庞塞蒂方法矫正特发性马蹄内翻足后预防复发的效果。
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011 May;93(5):700-4. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.93B5.24883.
7
Interventions for congenital talipes equinovarus (clubfoot).先天性马蹄内翻足的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 May 15;5(5):CD008602. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008602.pub4.
8
Comparison of Ponseti and Kite's method of treatment for idiopathic clubfoot.庞塞蒂法与凯特法治疗特发性马蹄内翻足的比较。
Indian J Orthop. 2010 Apr;44(2):202-7. doi: 10.4103/0019-5413.61941.
9
Ponseti method in the treatment of post-operative relapsed idiopathic clubfoot after posteromedial release. A short term functional study.庞塞蒂方法治疗内侧松解术后复发性特发性马蹄内翻足:一项短期功能研究
Foot (Edinb). 2020 Dec;45:101721. doi: 10.1016/j.foot.2020.101721. Epub 2020 Jul 25.
10
Treatment of Clubfoot Using the Ponseti Method.使用庞塞蒂方法治疗马蹄内翻足。
JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2016 Aug 10;6(3):e28. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.14.00112. eCollection 2016 Sep 28.

本文引用的文献

1
Long-term outcomes of the Ponseti method for treatment of clubfoot: a systematic review.潘塞提方法治疗马蹄足的长期疗效:系统评价。
Int Orthop. 2021 Oct;45(10):2599-2608. doi: 10.1007/s00264-021-05189-w. Epub 2021 Aug 20.
2
Interventions for congenital talipes equinovarus (clubfoot).先天性马蹄内翻足的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 May 15;5(5):CD008602. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008602.pub4.
3
Objective Measurement of Brace Wear in Successfully Ponseti-Treated Clubfeet: Pattern of Decreasing Use in the First 2 Years.
客观测量成功接受潘塞提治疗的马蹄内翻足的支具佩戴情况:头 2 年支具使用量逐渐减少的模式。
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2020 May 1;28(9):383-387. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-19-00163.
4
Bracing in clubfoot: do we know enough?马蹄内翻足的支具治疗:我们了解得够多了吗?
J Child Orthop. 2019 Jun 1;13(3):258-264. doi: 10.1302/1863-2548.13.190069.
5
Congenital talipes equinovarus: a systematic review of relapse as a primary outcome of the Ponseti method.先天性马蹄内翻足:经皮跟腱切断术作为潘塞提方法主要结局的复发的系统评价。
Bone Joint J. 2019 Jun;101-B(6):639-645. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.101B6.BJJ-2018-1421.R1.
6
Relapse Rates in Patients with Clubfoot Treated Using the Ponseti Method Increase with Time: A Systematic Review.采用庞塞蒂方法治疗的马蹄内翻足患者的复发率随时间增加:一项系统评价。
JBJS Rev. 2019 May;7(5):e6. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.18.00124.
7
A new unilateral abduction orthosis for Ponseti-treated clubfoot: A cohort study to assess compliance.一种用于经庞塞蒂方法治疗的马蹄内翻足的新型单侧外展矫形器:一项评估依从性的队列研究
Prosthet Orthot Int. 2019 Jun;43(3):325-330. doi: 10.1177/0309364618814866. Epub 2018 Dec 17.
8
Neurodevelopmental difficulties in children with idiopathic clubfoot.特发性马蹄内翻足患儿的神经发育困难。
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2019 Jan;61(1):98-104. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.13996. Epub 2018 Aug 21.
9
Is unilateral lower leg orthosis with a circular foot unit in the treatment of idiopathic clubfeet a reasonable bracing alternative in the Ponseti method? Five-year results of a supraregional paediatric-orthopaedic centre.在庞塞蒂方法中,使用带有圆形足部组件的单侧小腿矫形器治疗特发性马蹄内翻足是否是一种合理的支具选择?一家地区性儿科骨科中心的五年随访结果。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018 Jul 18;19(1):229. doi: 10.1186/s12891-018-2160-1.
10
Clubfoot Infants Initially Thought to be Idiopathic, But Later Found Not to Be. How do They do With Nonoperative Treatment?最初被认为是特发性的马蹄内翻足婴儿,但后来发现并非如此。他们接受非手术治疗的效果如何?
J Pediatr Orthop. 2019 Jan;39(1):42-45. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000000984.