Barausse Carlo, Tayeb Subhi, Pellegrino Gerardo, Bonifazi Lorenzo, Mancuso Edoardo, Ratti Stefano, Galvani Andrea, Pistilli Roberto, Felice Pietro
Oral Surgery Unit, Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences (DIBINEM), University of Bologna, 40125 Bologna, Italy.
Cellular Signaling Laboratory, Anatomy Center, Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences (DIBINEM), University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy.
J Clin Med. 2025 Mar 2;14(5):1684. doi: 10.3390/jcm14051684.
: Vertical ridge augmentation remains a critical challenge in implant dentistry for addressing inadequate alveolar bone height. The inlay technique, or sandwich osteotomy, has gained attention for its potential to improve graft vascularization and predictability. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of the inlay technique. : A systematic search was conducted in Cochrane Library and Medline databases for studies published from 2015 to 2025 to capture the most recent studies and advancements specifically focusing on the inlay technique. Inclusion criteria encompassed observational and interventional studies, including randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort and case series with a focus on outcomes related to the inlay technique. Key outcomes were extracted and analyzed, including implant survival rates, MBL, vertical bone gain, and surgical complications. : Eleven studies involving 352 patients and more than 612 implants were included, with a mean follow-up of 2.27 ± 2.69 years (range: 4 months to 8 years). The implant survival rates ranged from 84.5% to 100%. Mean vertical bone gain varied from 2.69 to 4.4 mm. Complications were fewer with the inlay technique compared to onlay and other grafting methods, with significantly reduced graft-related failures and soft tissue issues. : The inlay technique shows good vertical bone augmentation with high implant survival rates and fewer complications compared to other reconstructive techniques. Longer follow-up studies are needed to support its value in managing vertically deficient ridges. Moreover, further studies with extended follow-up are required to evaluate long-term marginal bone loss.
对于解决牙槽骨高度不足的问题,垂直骨增量在种植牙科领域仍然是一项严峻挑战。嵌体技术,即三明治式截骨术,因其在改善植骨血管化和可预测性方面的潜力而受到关注。本系统评价旨在评估嵌体技术的临床效果。
在Cochrane图书馆和Medline数据库中进行了系统检索,以查找2015年至2025年发表的研究,从而获取专门聚焦于嵌体技术的最新研究和进展。纳入标准包括观察性和干预性研究,包括随机对照试验(RCT)以及队列研究和病例系列,重点关注与嵌体技术相关的结果。提取并分析了关键结果,包括种植体存活率、边缘骨丧失(MBL)、垂直骨增量和手术并发症。
纳入了11项研究,涉及352例患者和612颗以上种植体,平均随访时间为2.27±2.69年(范围:4个月至8年)。种植体存活率在84.5%至100%之间。平均垂直骨增量在2.69至4.4毫米之间。与覆盖式植骨和其他植骨方法相比,嵌体技术的并发症更少,与植骨相关的失败和软组织问题显著减少。
与其他重建技术相比,嵌体技术显示出良好的垂直骨增量效果,种植体存活率高且并发症少。需要更长时间的随访研究来支持其在处理垂直骨量不足牙槽嵴方面的价值。此外,还需要进行更长时间随访的进一步研究,以评估长期边缘骨丧失情况。