Twose Paul, Terblanche Ella, Jones Laura, Cork Gabriella, Jones Una
Physiotherapy Department, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK.
School of Healthcare Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
J Intensive Care Soc. 2025 Mar 15:17511437251326776. doi: 10.1177/17511437251326776.
Non-medical consultant level roles have been in existence for over 30 years, however the number of allied health professionals (AHPs) working at this level, particularly in critical care, remains relatively small. National guidance highlights the importance of clinicians in these roles to work across the four pillars of practice. However, little research exists regarding the roles undertaken by these consultant-level practitioners, the contributions made to service delivery and their perceived impact on patient and service outcomes. Based on this, the aim of this project was to explore the perceived impact of consultant-level AHPs working within critical care.
Qualitative methodology was used involving a combination of interviews and focus groups. Purposeful sampling was used to recruit AHPs in consultant-level positions within critical care. Senior medical and nursing staff were then recruited via the AHPs. Data were analysed thematically using the Braun and Clarke methodology.
Five consultant-level AHPs were recruited to participate in interviews, with a further 7 participants from senior medical and nursing roles participating in one of two focus groups. The AHPs had been in a consultant-level role for an average of 3.2 years, with all participants reporting over 15 years' experience within critical care. Four core themes were generated from 105 unique codes and 13 subthemes. Personal characteristics were apparent across all themes and therefore was included as a central element. The core themes were (1) scope; (2) status; (3) supportive leadership and (4) impact.
Through four core themes, this study has highlighted the roles undertaken by consultant-level AHPs working in critical care, their perceived impact on patient and service outcomes, and their contribution to local, regional and national workstreams. Where these roles exist, they appear to be well received by senior medical and nursing staff, reporting the benefits of highly experienced members of clinical staff to improve service delivery, patient outcomes and contribute to strategic planning.
非医学顾问级别的职位已经存在了30多年,然而,处于这一级别的专职医疗人员(AHP)数量仍然相对较少,尤其是在重症监护领域。国家指南强调了担任这些职位的临床医生跨四个实践支柱开展工作的重要性。然而,关于这些顾问级从业者所承担的角色、对服务提供的贡献以及他们对患者和服务结果的感知影响,相关研究较少。基于此,本项目的目的是探讨重症监护领域顾问级AHP的感知影响。
采用定性研究方法,包括访谈和焦点小组相结合。采用目的抽样法招募重症监护领域顾问级职位的AHP。然后通过这些AHP招募高级医疗和护理人员。使用布劳恩和克拉克方法对数据进行主题分析。
招募了5名顾问级AHP参与访谈,另有7名来自高级医疗和护理岗位的参与者参加了两个焦点小组之一。这些AHP担任顾问级职位的平均时间为3.2年,所有参与者均报告在重症监护领域有超过15年的经验。从105个独特代码和13个子主题中产生了四个核心主题。个人特征在所有主题中都很明显,因此被作为核心要素纳入。核心主题为:(1)范围;(2)地位;(3)支持性领导;(4)影响。
通过四个核心主题,本研究突出了重症监护领域顾问级AHP所承担的角色、他们对患者和服务结果的感知影响,以及他们对地方、区域和国家工作流程的贡献。在这些角色存在的地方,高级医疗和护理人员似乎对其评价很高,他们报告称经验丰富的临床工作人员有助于改善服务提供、患者结果并为战略规划做出贡献。