Murphy Jason P, Bergström Clara, Gyllencruetz Lina
Department of Diagnostics and Intervention, Umeå University, Umeå, 90187, Sweden.
Institution for Health Sciences, Swedish Red Cross University, Huddinge, Sweden.
BMC Emerg Med. 2025 Mar 18;25(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s12873-025-01201-3.
Recent trends indicate that the frequency of major incidents (MIs) is increasing. Healthcare systems are vital actors in societies' responses to MIs. Well-prepared healthcare systems may mitigate the effects of MIs. Disaster preparedness is based on region-specific risk and vulnerability analyses (RVAs). Hospital incident command groups (HICGs) are commonly formed per hospital's contingency plan MI to aid in disaster response. Acquiring situational awareness and decision-making in the face of uncertainty are known challenges for HICGs during MIs. However, the remoteness of rural hospitals presents unique challenges.
The aim of this study was to explore HICG leaders' perceptions of disaster preparedness in rural hospitals.
A qualitative study with semi-structured, focus group, and individual interviews was used. The data were analyzed through inductive content analysis.
The analysis generated the main category, HICGs' confidence in handling major incidents and four categories. These were Uncertainty and level of recognition (containing two subcategories); Awareness of challenges and risks (containing two subcategories); Factors that facilitate preparedness, response, and leadership (containing three subcategories); and Prerequisites for decision-making (containing three subcategories and four subcategories).
HICG leaders generally perceived their hospital's disaster preparedness as adequate. However, preparedness was found to be influenced by several factors. The findings revealed a complex interplay of factors influencing preparedness and response, particularly highlighting challenges related to geographical isolation and resource constraints. Effective preparedness requires a comprehensive understanding of local contexts, hospital capabilities, and risks, which directly impacts training, decision-making, and resource allocation. Addressing the identified vulnerabilities necessitates targeted interventions focused on situational awareness, decision-making, collaboration, and training.
Not applicable.
近期趋势表明,重大事件(MI)的发生频率正在增加。医疗保健系统是社会应对重大事件的关键参与者。准备充分的医疗保健系统可能会减轻重大事件的影响。灾难准备工作基于特定区域的风险和脆弱性分析(RVA)。医院事故指挥小组(HICG)通常根据医院针对重大事件的应急预案组建,以协助应对灾难。在重大事件期间,面对不确定性获取态势感知和进行决策是医院事故指挥小组面临的已知挑战。然而,农村医院的偏远性带来了独特的挑战。
本研究的目的是探讨医院事故指挥小组负责人对农村医院灾难准备工作的看法。
采用了一项包含半结构化、焦点小组和个人访谈的定性研究。通过归纳性内容分析对数据进行了分析。
分析得出了主要类别“医院事故指挥小组应对重大事件的信心”以及四个类别。这些类别分别是不确定性和认知水平(包含两个子类别);对挑战和风险的认识(包含两个子类别);促进准备、应对和领导的因素(包含三个子类别);以及决策的先决条件(包含三个子类别和四个子类别)。
医院事故指挥小组负责人普遍认为其医院的灾难准备工作是充分的。然而,发现准备工作受到若干因素的影响。研究结果揭示了影响准备和应对的因素之间存在复杂的相互作用,尤其突出了与地理隔离和资源限制相关的挑战。有效的准备工作需要全面了解当地情况、医院能力和风险,这直接影响培训、决策和资源分配。解决已确定的脆弱性问题需要有针对性地干预,重点是态势感知、决策、协作和培训。
不适用。