Colman Lisa, Delaruelle Katrijn, Bracke Piet
Department of Sociology, HeDeRa (Health and Demographic Research), Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Front Sociol. 2025 Mar 4;10:1204794. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2025.1204794. eCollection 2025.
Previous studies have identified socioeconomic inequalities in the treatment of depression. However, these studies often take a narrow approach, focusing on a single treatment type and lacking a comprehensive theoretical framework. Moreover, income and education are frequently used interchangeably as indicators of disadvantage, without distinguishing their unique impacts. This study argues that relying solely on income to explain treatment inequalities is overly simplistic, suggesting instead that education influences treatment through two distinct pathways. The study's objectives are twofold: first, to investigate the presence of a social gradient in depression treatment, and second, to examine how this gradient is manifested.
This study utilizes data from the Belgian Health Interview Survey (BHIS), covering four successive waves: 2004, 2008, 2013, and 2018. The weighted data represent a sample of the adult Belgian population. Multinomial regression models are used to address the research aims, and models are plotted to detect trends over time using marginal means post-estimation.
Findings indicate that income is not significantly related to depression treatment, while persistent educational inequalities in treatment are observed over time. Individuals with longer educational attainment are more likely to use psychotherapy alone or a combination treatment, whereas individuals with shorter educational attainment are more likely to use pharmaceutical treatment alone.
This study demonstrates that education plays a critical role in fostering health-related knowledge and reasoning, making individuals with longer education more likely to engage in rational health behaviors and choose more effective treatments, even when these treatments require more effort and competencies. The findings underscore the importance of considering education as a key determinant of depression treatment inequalities.
先前的研究已经确定了抑郁症治疗中的社会经济不平等现象。然而,这些研究往往采用狭隘的方法,只关注单一的治疗类型,缺乏全面的理论框架。此外,收入和教育经常被交替用作劣势指标,而没有区分它们的独特影响。本研究认为,仅依靠收入来解释治疗不平等过于简单化,相反,教育通过两条不同的途径影响治疗。该研究的目标有两个:第一,调查抑郁症治疗中社会梯度的存在;第二,研究这种梯度是如何表现的。
本研究利用了比利时健康访谈调查(BHIS)的数据,涵盖了2004年、2008年、2013年和2018年连续的四个阶段。加权数据代表了比利时成年人口的样本。使用多项回归模型来实现研究目标,并在估计后使用边际均值绘制模型以检测随时间的趋势。
研究结果表明,收入与抑郁症治疗没有显著关系,而随着时间的推移,可以观察到治疗中持续存在的教育不平等现象。受教育程度较高的个体更有可能单独使用心理治疗或联合治疗,而受教育程度较低的个体更有可能单独使用药物治疗。
本研究表明,教育在培养与健康相关的知识和推理能力方面起着关键作用,使受教育程度较高的个体更有可能采取理性的健康行为并选择更有效的治疗方法,即使这些治疗需要更多的努力和能力。研究结果强调了将教育视为抑郁症治疗不平等的关键决定因素的重要性。