Lodi Sara, Yan Shapei, Bovell-Ammon Benjamin, Christine Paul J, Hsu Heather E, Bernson Dana, Novo Patricia, Lee Joshua D, Rotrosen John, Liebschutz Jane M, Walley Alexander Y, Larochelle Marc R
Department of Biostatistics, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Section of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Boston Medical Center and Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
Addiction. 2025 Aug;120(8):1634-1645. doi: 10.1111/add.70040. Epub 2025 Mar 19.
It is unclear if findings from randomized controlled trials (RCT) of medications for opioid use disorder apply to real-world settings. We estimated the effectiveness of buprenorphine-naloxone (BUP-NX) versus extended-release naltrexone (XR-NTX) on treatment interruption in a RCT and an observational study based on real-world data.
Target trial emulation to harmonize the protocol and statistical analyses of X:BOT (target trial) and the observational study (observational emulation). Baseline was randomization in the target trial and medically managed opioid withdrawal (MMOW) discharge in the observational emulation.
X:BOT trial and Massachusetts Public Health Data Warehouse observational data (United States).
The target trial included all X:BOT participants. The observational emulation trial included MMOW discharges from January 2014 to May 2016.
Treatment strategies were BUP-NX versus XR-NTX initiation within 28 days of baseline. The outcome was treatment interruption (earliest of treatment discontinuation, incarceration, MMOW readmission, death). We estimated the 24-week risk and risk difference.
In the target trial, 94% (269/287) and 66% (187/283) of participants randomized to BUP-NX or XR-NTX initiated their assigned treatment within 28 days, respectively. In the observational emulation, BUP-NX and XR-NTX were initiated within 28 days in 9% (5209/59 076) and 3% (1813/59 076) of MMOW discharges, respectively. The adjusted 24-week treatment interruption risks (95% confidence interval) for BUP-NX and XR-NTX were 68% (60%,77%) and 72% (60%,83%) in the target trial [risk difference, -4 percentage points (pp; -17 pp,11 pp)] and 82% (81%,83%) and 93% (92%,95%) in the observational emulation [risk difference,-11 pp (-13 pp,-10 pp)].
Buprenorphine-naloxone might be superior to extended-release naltrexone in real-world settings where the majority of people struggle to remain on medications for opioid use disorder. Buprenorphine-naloxone initiators had a lower risk of treatment interruption than extended-release naltrexone initiators in an observational emulation, but similar risks in a randomized controlled trial, although confidence intervals were wide. Trial participation, study size and residual confounding may explain these differences.
用于阿片类物质使用障碍的药物随机对照试验(RCT)结果是否适用于现实环境尚不清楚。我们在一项RCT和一项基于真实世界数据的观察性研究中,评估了丁丙诺啡 - 纳洛酮(BUP-NX)与纳曲酮缓释剂(XR-NTX)对治疗中断的有效性。
目标试验模拟,以协调X:BOT(目标试验)和观察性研究(观察性模拟)的方案与统计分析。目标试验中的基线是随机分组,观察性模拟中的基线是药物辅助下的阿片类物质戒断(MMOW)出院。
X:BOT试验和马萨诸塞州公共卫生数据仓库观察性数据(美国)。
目标试验纳入了所有X:BOT参与者。观察性模拟试验纳入了2014年1月至2016年5月的MMOW出院患者。
治疗策略为在基线后28天内开始使用BUP-NX与XR-NTX。结局为治疗中断(最早为治疗终止、监禁、MMOW再次入院、死亡)。我们估计了24周的风险及风险差异。
在目标试验中,随机分配至BUP-NX或XR-NTX的参与者分别有94%(269/287)和66%(187/283)在28天内开始使用指定治疗。在观察性模拟中,MMOW出院患者中分别有9%(5209/59 076)和3%(1813/59 076)在28天内开始使用BUP-NX和XR-NTX。目标试验中BUP-NX和XR-NTX调整后的24周治疗中断风险(95%置信区间)分别为68%(60%,77%)和72%(60%,83%)[风险差异为 -4个百分点(pp;-17 pp,11 pp)],观察性模拟中分别为82%(81%,83%)和93%(92%,95%)[风险差异为 -11 pp(-13 pp,-10 pp)]。
在大多数人难以坚持使用治疗阿片类物质使用障碍药物的现实环境中,丁丙诺啡 - 纳洛酮可能优于纳曲酮缓释剂。在观察性模拟中,开始使用丁丙诺啡 - 纳洛酮的患者治疗中断风险低于开始使用纳曲酮缓释剂的患者,但在随机对照试验中风险相似,尽管置信区间较宽。试验参与情况、研究规模和残余混杂因素可能解释了这些差异。