Suppr超能文献

有助于流畅阅读(非)单词列表和文本的词间处理和文本层面技能。

Between-word processing and text-level skills contributing to fluent reading of (non)word lists and text.

作者信息

van Viersen Sietske, Altani Angeliki, de Jong Peter F, Protopapas Athanassios

机构信息

Department of Development and Education of Youth in Diverse Societies, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Department of Special Needs Education, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

Read Writ. 2025;38(3):671-697. doi: 10.1007/s11145-024-10533-8. Epub 2024 Apr 3.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

Recent studies have shown that fluent reading of word lists requires additional skills beyond efficient recognition of individual words. This study examined the specific contribution of between-word processing (sequential processing efficiency, indexed by serial digit RAN) and subskills related to text-level processing (vocabulary and syntactic skills) to a wide range of reading fluency tasks, while accounting for within-word processes (i.e., those involved in phonological recoding, orthographic decoding, and sight word reading). The sample included 139 intermediate-level (Grade 3,  = 78) and more advanced (Grade 5,  = 61) readers of Dutch. Fluency measures included simple and complex lists of words and nonwords, and a complex text. Data were analyzed through hierarchical regressions and commonality analyses. The findings confirm the importance of between-word processing for fluent reading and extend evidence from simple word lists and texts to complex word lists and texts, and simple and complex lists of nonwords. The findings hold for both intermediate-level and more advanced readers and, as expected, the contribution of between-word processing increased with reading-skill level. Effects of vocabulary were generally absent, aside from a small effect on text reading fluency in Grade 3. No effects of syntactic skills were found, even in more advanced readers. The results support the idea that once efficient individual word recognition is in place, further fluency development is driven by more efficient between-word processing. The findings also confirm that vocabulary may be less prominent in processing mechanisms underlying fluent word identification in transparent orthographies, across reading levels.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11145-024-10533-8.

摘要

未标注

最近的研究表明,流畅阅读单词列表需要除了有效识别单个单词之外的其他技能。本研究考察了词间加工(以连续数字快速自动命名为指标的序列加工效率)以及与文本层面加工相关的子技能(词汇和句法技能)对广泛的阅读流畅性任务的具体贡献,同时考虑了词内加工过程(即那些参与语音编码、正字法解码和视觉词阅读的过程)。样本包括139名荷兰语中级(三年级,n = 78)和更高级(五年级,n = 61)读者。流畅性测量包括简单和复杂的单词及非单词列表,以及一篇复杂文本。数据通过分层回归和共性分析进行分析。研究结果证实了词间加工对流畅阅读的重要性,并将证据从简单单词列表和文本扩展到复杂单词列表和文本,以及简单和复杂的非单词列表。研究结果适用于中级和更高级读者,并且正如预期的那样,词间加工的贡献随着阅读技能水平的提高而增加。除了对三年级文本阅读流畅性有较小影响外,词汇通常没有影响。即使在更高级读者中,也未发现句法技能的影响。结果支持这样一种观点,即一旦有效的单个单词识别到位,进一步的流畅性发展由更有效的词间加工驱动。研究结果还证实,在透明正字法中,跨阅读水平,词汇在流畅单词识别的潜在加工机制中可能不那么突出。

补充信息

在线版本包含可在10.1007/s11145-024-10533-8获取的补充材料。

相似文献

1
Between-word processing and text-level skills contributing to fluent reading of (non)word lists and text.
Read Writ. 2025;38(3):671-697. doi: 10.1007/s11145-024-10533-8. Epub 2024 Apr 3.
2
Word- and Text-Level Processes Contributing to Fluent Reading of Word Lists and Sentences.
Front Psychol. 2022 Jan 10;12:789313. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.789313. eCollection 2021.
3
Orthographic processing is a key predictor of reading fluency in good and poor readers in a transparent orthography.
Contemp Educ Psychol. 2019 Jan;56:250-261. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2018.12.002. Epub 2019 Jan 7.
4
What predicts word reading in Arabic?
Front Psychol. 2023 Apr 27;14:1077643. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1077643. eCollection 2023.
5
Cascaded processing in naming and reading: Evidence from Chinese and Korean.
J Exp Child Psychol. 2022 Aug;220:105416. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2022.105416. Epub 2022 Mar 26.
6
Preliminary validation of FastaReada as a measure of reading fluency.
Front Psychol. 2015 Oct 27;6:1634. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01634. eCollection 2015.
7
WordDriver-1: evaluating the efficacy of an app-supported decoding intervention for children with reading impairment.
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2019 Mar;54(2):189-202. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12388. Epub 2018 Apr 24.
9
Phonics training for English-speaking poor readers.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Nov 14;11(11):CD009115. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009115.pub3.
10
The Contribution of Phonological Awareness to Reading Fluency and Its Individual Sub-skills in Readers Aged 9- to 12-years.
Front Psychol. 2017 Apr 11;8:533. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00533. eCollection 2017.

本文引用的文献

1
Conflict monitoring or multi-tasking? Tracking within-task performance in single-item and multi-item Stroop tasks.
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2022 Jun;226:103583. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2022.103583. Epub 2022 Apr 2.
2
Cascaded processing in naming and reading: Evidence from Chinese and Korean.
J Exp Child Psychol. 2022 Aug;220:105416. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2022.105416. Epub 2022 Mar 26.
3
Task format modulates the relationship between reading ability and Stroop interference.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2022 Apr;48(4):275-288. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000964. Epub 2022 Feb 10.
4
Word- and Text-Level Processes Contributing to Fluent Reading of Word Lists and Sentences.
Front Psychol. 2022 Jan 10;12:789313. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.789313. eCollection 2021.
5
Lexicality effects on orthographic learning in beginning and advanced readers of Dutch: An eye-tracking study.
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2022 Jun;75(6):1135-1154. doi: 10.1177/17470218211047420. Epub 2021 Sep 28.
6
The relation of visual attention span with serial and discrete rapid automatized naming and reading.
J Exp Child Psychol. 2021 Jul;207:105093. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2021.105093. Epub 2021 Mar 4.
7
Toward Integrative Reading Science: The Direct and Indirect Effects Model of Reading.
J Learn Disabil. 2020 Nov/Dec;53(6):469-491. doi: 10.1177/0022219420908239. Epub 2020 Mar 3.
8
Using Serial and Discrete Digit Naming to Unravel Word Reading Processes.
Front Psychol. 2018 Apr 13;9:524. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00524. eCollection 2018.
9
Pathways Into Literacy: The Role of Early Oral Language Abilities and Family Risk for Dyslexia.
Psychol Sci. 2018 Mar;29(3):418-428. doi: 10.1177/0956797617736886. Epub 2018 Jan 18.
10
Is processing of symbols and words influenced by writing system? Evidence from Chinese, Korean, English, and Greek.
J Exp Child Psychol. 2017 Dec;164:117-135. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2017.07.006. Epub 2017 Aug 16.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验