Kasekamp Kaija, Võrk Andres, Kalda Ruth
Institute of Family Medicine and Public Health, PhD student, MA in Financial Management and Accounting, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.
Faculty of Social Sciences, Johan Skytte Institute of Political Studies, Analyst, MA in Economics, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2025 Mar 20;26:e29. doi: 10.1017/S1463423625000222.
This study aims to assess the effect of primary health care (PHC) service provision continuity on inpatient admissions for people with chronic diseases in Estonia.
Non-communicable diseases (NCDs) were collectively responsible for more than 7 out of 10 deaths worldwide in 2019. As the burden of NCDs increases, PHC has an increased role of coordinating care management. High-performing PHC can reduce unnecessary hospitalizations. Estonia has a strong PHC system focusing on multidisciplinary care. Yet it has not been evaluated for its effect on hospitalizations. Therefore, it is imperative to evaluate PHC continuity to improve care for NCD patients.
This study used routinely collected electronic medical billing data of the Estonian population aged 15 years or older from 2005 to 2020 identifying patients with seven ambulatory care sensitive chronic (ACSC) conditions. We developed an indicator to describe the continuity of PHC. Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) was used to assess the impact of comorbidities and we controlled the patient's age, gender, county of residency and socio-economic status. We estimated multilevel logistic regression models with family doctor patient list random effects to assess how the odds of hospitalization depend on continuity of care, allowing for confounders.
We identified that 45% of the adult Estonian population had at least one of the target diagnoses. Among the target population, 96% had contact with their PHC providers. We found that there is a non-linear relationship between PHC continuity and patient outcomes. Any contact with PHC provider during the past 5 years decreases odds for hospitalization, but hospitalization risk is higher for people who are elderly and have higher CCI score. We found that after accounting for patient characteristics, differences among patient lists minimally impact outcomes. Further research should explore policies to better support family doctors in reducing hospitalizations for chronic patients.
本研究旨在评估爱沙尼亚初级卫生保健(PHC)服务提供的连续性对慢性病患者住院情况的影响。
2019年,全球十分之七以上的死亡由非传染性疾病(NCDs)共同导致。随着非传染性疾病负担的增加,初级卫生保健在协调护理管理方面的作用日益增强。高效的初级卫生保健可以减少不必要的住院治疗。爱沙尼亚拥有强大的初级卫生保健系统,注重多学科护理。然而,其对住院治疗的影响尚未得到评估。因此,评估初级卫生保健的连续性对于改善非传染性疾病患者的护理至关重要。
本研究使用了2005年至2020年爱沙尼亚15岁及以上人群的常规收集的电子医疗账单数据,以识别患有七种门诊护理敏感慢性病(ACSC)的患者。我们制定了一个指标来描述初级卫生保健的连续性。采用Charlson合并症指数(CCI)评估合并症的影响,并控制患者的年龄、性别、居住县和社会经济地位。我们估计了具有家庭医生患者名单随机效应的多级逻辑回归模型,以评估住院几率如何取决于护理的连续性,并考虑了混杂因素。
我们发现,45%的爱沙尼亚成年人口至少有一种目标诊断。在目标人群中,96%的人与他们的初级卫生保健提供者有接触。我们发现初级卫生保健的连续性与患者结局之间存在非线性关系。过去5年内与初级卫生保健提供者的任何接触都会降低住院几率,但老年人和CCI评分较高的人住院风险更高。我们发现,在考虑患者特征后,患者名单之间的差异对结局的影响最小。进一步的研究应探索政策,以更好地支持家庭医生减少慢性病患者的住院治疗。