Wilson Jino Victor, John Neenu Oliver, Sathyamurthy Arvind, Ramireddy Jeba Karunya, Thomas Anitha, Sebastian Ajith, Ram Thomas Samuel
Department of Radiation Oncology, Dr. Ida B Scudder Cancer Centre, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu India.
Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.
Indian J Surg Oncol. 2025 Feb;16(1):109-116. doi: 10.1007/s13193-024-02041-6. Epub 2024 Jul 31.
Vulvar carcinoma represents 3-5% of all gynecological malignancies and 1% of female cancers. Primary surgical excision is the cornerstone of treatment for early-stage invasive disease. Adjuvant radiation therapy reduces the risk of local recurrence in patients with high-risk features, and radical chemoradiation is an option for locally advanced vulvar cancer. This retrospective study aimed to analyze the clinical presentation, treatment details, outcomes, patterns of failure, and possible prognostic factors. We reviewed the electronic medical records of 53 patients diagnosed with carcinoma of the vulva from January 2005 to December 2020. All patients with biopsy-proven carcinoma of the vulva who received radiation therapy with or without surgery were included in the study. The median age at presentation was 59 years (range 35-85 years). The most common stage at presentation was Stage III (37.7%, = 20), followed by Stage IB (22.6%, = 12). Thirty patients (56.6%) underwent surgery, and the majority (76.7%) underwent radical vulvectomy with bilateral inguinofemoral block dissection. Nineteen patients (55.9%) received adjuvant radiation therapy for various indications, such as close margins, positive margins, or positive nodes. Twenty patients (37.7%) received definitive chemoradiation therapy, for a median dose of 66 Gy in 33 fractions. Acute toxicity in the form of Grade 3 dermatitis was observed in 19 out of 45 patients (42.2%) who received RT, and late toxicity in the form of lymphedema was observed in 5 patients (11.1%). The median follow-up was 20 months (0-170 months). At follow-up, 25 patients (47.1%) were disease free or had stable disease, 14 patients (26.4%) had local or inguinal nodal recurrence or progression, 2 patients (3.7%) had metastatic disease (lung, mediastinal node), and 13 patients (24.5%) were lost to follow-up. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 24 months (95% CI 17.2 to 30.8 months), and the median overall survival (OS) was 29 months (95% CI 21-37 months). Radical surgery followed by adjuvant radiation therapy led to superior outcomes in terms of progression-free survival ( = 0.0001) and overall survival ( = 0.005). Radical surgery followed by adjuvant radiation therapy was associated with the most favorable PFS and OS. Definitive chemoradiation therapy with modern radiation techniques is an alternative to radical surgery for medically/surgically inoperable locally advanced vulvar cancer patients and has favorable outcomes and toxicity profiles. Given the rarity of vulvar carcinoma, further research and multicenter studies are warranted to enhance our understanding of this malignancy and optimize treatment strategies to improve patient outcomes.
外阴癌占所有妇科恶性肿瘤的3%-5%,占女性癌症的1%。原发性手术切除是早期浸润性疾病治疗的基石。辅助放疗可降低具有高危特征患者的局部复发风险,而根治性放化疗是局部晚期外阴癌的一种选择。这项回顾性研究旨在分析临床表现、治疗细节、结局、失败模式及可能的预后因素。我们回顾了2005年1月至2020年12月期间53例经活检证实为外阴癌患者的电子病历。所有经活检证实为外阴癌且接受了放疗(无论是否联合手术)的患者均纳入本研究。就诊时的中位年龄为59岁(范围35-85岁)。就诊时最常见的分期为Ⅲ期(37.7%,n = 20),其次为ⅠB期(22.6%,n = 12)。30例患者(56.6%)接受了手术,大多数(76.7%)接受了根治性外阴切除术及双侧腹股沟股淋巴结清扫术。19例患者(55.9%)因各种指征接受了辅助放疗,如切缘接近、切缘阳性或淋巴结阳性。20例患者(37.7%)接受了根治性放化疗,中位剂量为66 Gy,分33次给予。45例接受放疗的患者中有19例(42.2%)出现了3级皮炎形式的急性毒性反应,5例患者(11.1%)出现了淋巴水肿形式的晚期毒性反应。中位随访时间为20个月(0-170个月)。随访时,25例患者(47.1%)无疾病或疾病稳定,14例患者(26.4%)出现局部或腹股沟淋巴结复发或进展,2例患者(3.7%)出现转移性疾病(肺、纵隔淋巴结),13例患者(24.5%)失访。中位无进展生存期(PFS)为24个月(95%CI 17.2至30.8个月),中位总生存期(OS)为29个月(95%CI 21-37个月)。根治性手术联合辅助放疗在无进展生存期(P = 0.0001)和总生存期(P = 0.005)方面导致了更好的结局。根治性手术联合辅助放疗与最有利的PFS和OS相关。对于医学上/手术上无法切除的局部晚期外阴癌患者,采用现代放疗技术的根治性放化疗是根治性手术的一种替代方法,且具有良好的结局和毒性特征。鉴于外阴癌的罕见性,有必要进行进一步研究和多中心研究,以增进我们对这种恶性肿瘤的了解,并优化治疗策略以改善患者结局。