Doldi Philipp M, Weckbach Ludwig T, Fink Nicola, Stolz Lukas, Ennin Cecilia, Dinkel Julien, Lurz Philipp, Thiele Holger, Hahn Rebecca T, Cavalcante João L, Besler Christian, Hausleiter Jörg
Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik I, Klinikum der Universität München, Munich, Germany (P.M.D., L.T.W., L.S., C.E., J.H.).
Munich Heart Alliance, Partner Site German Center for Cardiovascular Disease, Munich, Germany (P.M.D., L.T.W., L.S., J.H.).
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2025 Apr;18(4):e017638. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.124.017638. Epub 2025 Mar 21.
Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is associated with increased mortality and is often underdiagnosed due to limitations in imaging modalities. While routine 2-dimensional echocardiography (2DE) demonstrates frequent disagreement with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) in classifying TR severity, the incremental value of 3-dimensional echocardiography (3DE) remains unknown also due to the lack of a generalizable grading scheme across imaging modalities. Therefore, this study provides an intermodality comparison of all 3 imaging modalities (2DE, 3DE, and CMR) in evaluating TR severity and proposes an adapted 5-class grading scheme for TR severity using CMR.
A total of 144 patients with symptomatic TR were analyzed across 2 cohorts: a derivation cohort (n=91) from the University Hospital of Munich and a validation cohort (n=53) from the Heart Center Leipzig. All patients underwent multimodality imaging, including transthoracic 2DE, transesophageal 3DE, and CMR. The adapted 5-class CMR-based grading scheme was proposed and externally validated.
In the derivation cohort (median age 81 years, 66% female), TR severity grading by 3DE highly correlated with CMR (87% concordance within a 1-grade difference), significantly outperforming 2DE (68% concordance). While 3DE underestimated right ventricular dimensions compared with CMR (<0.001), it provided a comparable measure of TR severity and right ventricular function. 2DE achieved the lowest accuracy rates compared with CMR (34.5%; =0.005) with frequent overestimation of TR severity. An overestimation of TR severity by 3DE compared with CMR was significantly less frequent than with 2DE (21% versus 56%; <0.001). Cohen κ analysis confirmed a substantial and superior agreement between 3DE and CMR compared with 2DE (κ=0.63 versus 0.41; =0.01). The results were externally validated, showing comparable results within the derivation and validation cohorts.
3DE provides an accurate assessment of TR severity comparable to CMR. The proposed 5-class grading scheme for TR severity using CMR demonstrates high accuracy and external validity.
三尖瓣反流(TR)与死亡率增加相关,且由于成像方式的局限性,其常常未被充分诊断。虽然常规二维超声心动图(2DE)在TR严重程度分级方面与心脏磁共振成像(CMR)的结果常常不一致,但由于缺乏适用于所有成像方式的通用分级方案,三维超声心动图(3DE)的增量价值也尚不明确。因此,本研究对三种成像方式(2DE、3DE和CMR)评估TR严重程度进行了跨模态比较,并提出了一种基于CMR的适用于TR严重程度的5级分级方案。
对来自慕尼黑大学医院的一个推导队列(n = 91)和莱比锡心脏中心的一个验证队列(n = 53)中的总共144例有症状的TR患者进行了分析。所有患者均接受了多模态成像检查,包括经胸2DE、经食管3DE和CMR。提出了基于CMR的适用于TR严重程度的5级分级方案并进行了外部验证。
在推导队列(中位年龄81岁,66%为女性)中,3DE对TR严重程度的分级与CMR高度相关(在相差1级范围内的一致性为87%),显著优于2DE(一致性为68%)。虽然与CMR相比,3DE低估了右心室尺寸(<0.001),但它提供了与TR严重程度和右心室功能相当的测量值。与CMR相比,2DE的准确率最低(34.5%;P = 0.005),且常常高估TR严重程度。与CMR相比,3DE对TR严重程度的高估显著少于2DE(21%对56%;P < 0.001)。Cohen κ分析证实,与2DE相比,3DE和CMR之间的一致性程度更高且更优(κ = 0.63对0.41;P = 0.01)。结果在外部验证中得到了验证,在推导队列和验证队列中显示出可比的结果。
3DE对TR严重程度的评估与CMR相当准确。所提出的基于CMR的适用于TR严重程度的5级分级方案显示出高准确性和外部有效性。