Kandakurti Praveen Kumar, Muthukrishnan Ramprasad, Arulsingh Watson, Hazari Animesh
Department of Physiotherapy, College of Health Sciences, Gulf Medical University, Ajman, United Arab Emirates.
J Med Case Rep. 2025 Mar 21;19(1):133. doi: 10.1186/s13256-025-05179-1.
Despite appropriate interventions, healing following hamstring strain tends to be slow. Prediction for return to play is inconsistent, and recurrence of injuries is high, which poses a challenge and burden to athletes, sports physiotherapists, and trainers. The exact mechanism of hamstring strain injury or re-injury still remains unclear. The primary focus of this case report was to discuss a patient's course of treatment with relentless symptoms of hamstring strain and how he responded to neuromeningeal mobilization and postural re-education.
A 20-year-old male Arabic martial artist had a history of left hamstring strain for the past 5 weeks. He had undergone pharmacological and physiotherapeutic interventions for his clinical conditions but had not responded favorably. Further clinical assessment had ruled out hamstring syndrome. The patient refrained from all sports activities.
The patient was treated using a modified slump mobilization technique with four repetitions for 3 consecutive days, together with postural retraining. Results of the numeric pain rating scale and Knee Society score before and after the interventions were obtained.
Pre-intervention score of the numeric pain rating scale was 5/10 and 7/10 at rest and with activity, respectively. Assessment on the 3rd consecutive day of intervention, the numeric pain rating scale decreased to 2/10 and 4/10 at rest and with activity, respectively. Similarly, the pre- and post-intervention Knee Society score improved from 22 to 61 in pain and from 30 to 80 in function. At the 2-month follow-up, the patient reported a complete recovery from symptoms and resumed his sports activities without any disruption.
Neuromeningel mobilization and postural re-education exercises are suggested as mainstream of treatment for hamstring strains, even when the slump test is negative. This report calls for a need of advancement in diagnostic procedure dealing with all hamstring strain injury conditions. More prospective studies are recommended to confirm the current findings.
尽管采取了适当的干预措施,但腘绳肌拉伤后的恢复往往较慢。恢复比赛的预测并不一致,且损伤复发率很高,这给运动员、运动物理治疗师和教练带来了挑战和负担。腘绳肌拉伤或再次拉伤的确切机制仍不清楚。本病例报告的主要重点是讨论一名有持续腘绳肌拉伤症状患者的治疗过程,以及他对神经脑膜松动术和姿势再教育的反应。
一名20岁的阿拉伯武术男性运动员在过去5周内有左侧腘绳肌拉伤史。他针对自己的临床状况接受了药物和物理治疗干预,但效果不佳。进一步的临床评估排除了腘绳肌综合征。患者停止了所有体育活动。
采用改良的垂头弯腰松动技术对患者进行治疗,连续3天,每天重复4次,并进行姿势再训练。获取干预前后数字疼痛评分量表和膝关节协会评分的结果。
干预前数字疼痛评分量表在休息和活动时的得分分别为5/10和7/10。在干预的连续第3天进行评估时,数字疼痛评分量表在休息和活动时分别降至2/10和4/10。同样,膝关节协会评分在疼痛方面从干预前的22分提高到61分,在功能方面从30分提高到80分。在2个月的随访中,患者报告症状完全恢复,并毫无障碍地恢复了体育活动。
即使垂头弯腰试验结果为阴性,神经脑膜松动术和姿势再教育练习也建议作为腘绳肌拉伤治疗的主流方法。本报告呼吁在处理所有腘绳肌拉伤损伤情况的诊断程序方面取得进展。建议进行更多前瞻性研究以证实当前的发现。