Sardenberg Rodrigo Afonso da Silva, Monteiro Mariana Ribeiro, Bognar Cinthia Leite Frizzera Borges, Gondim Teixeira Victor Braga, de Carvalho Moreira Rodrigo, Sznejder Henry, Younes Riad Naim
Instituto Americas, São Paulo, Brazil.
Centro de Pesquisa Internacional do Hospital Alemão Oswaldo Cruz, São Paulo, Brazil.
JCO Glob Oncol. 2025 Mar;11:e2400253. doi: 10.1200/GO-24-00253. Epub 2025 Mar 28.
Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is often diagnosed at late stages, leading to escalated treatment expenses. This study aimed to elucidate the costs of lung cancer treatment in a private health care setting in Brazil.
We conducted a retrospective cohort study, regarding costs, survival, and quality of care of stage IV NSCLC in a private health company in Brazil.
A total of 819 individuals were included, with median age 64.9 years. With a 1-year follow-up, patients had a median of four hospital admissions, with a median length of stay in of 6.2 days. Survival rates were higher for patients treated with targeted therapy (hazard ratio [HR], 0.38 [95% CI, 0.25 to 0.56]), immunotherapy (HR, 0.52 [95% CI, 0.40 to 0.68]), or both treatments sequentially (0.41 [95% CI, 0.25 to 0.68]). Patients submitted to sequentially targeted therapy and immunotherapy had the higher total costs (mean, $172,828 USD) compared with patients treated with immunotherapy (mean, $138,125 USD), targeted therapy (mean, $117,068 USD), and only chemotherapy (mean, $47,625 USD). As expected, longer survival was translated into more third-line therapy ( < .001), and higher mean costs with cancer-related hospital admissions ($24,554 USD chemo, $31,835 USD immuno, $28,228 USD targeted, and $35,494 USD for both therapies). However, costs did not increase in proportion to the survival benefit. Despite longer survival, patients undergoing targeted therapy or immunotherapy had median number of hospital admissions and length of stay similar to those who underwent chemotherapy alone.
Higher survival rates and costs were found for patients exposed to modern treatments for advanced NSCLC. Cost-effectiveness thresholds definitions are warranted for managing costs, particularly in developing countries.
非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)常于晚期被诊断出来,导致治疗费用不断攀升。本研究旨在阐明巴西一家私立医疗保健机构中肺癌治疗的费用情况。
我们针对巴西一家私立健康公司中IV期NSCLC的费用、生存率及护理质量进行了一项回顾性队列研究。
共纳入819名个体,中位年龄为64.9岁。经过1年的随访,患者平均住院4次,中位住院时长为6.2天。接受靶向治疗(风险比[HR],0.38[95%置信区间,0.25至0.56])、免疫治疗(HR,0.52[95%置信区间,0.40至0.68])或先后接受这两种治疗(0.41[95%置信区间,0.25至0.68])的患者生存率更高。与接受免疫治疗(平均费用为138,125美元)、靶向治疗(平均费用为117,068美元)以及仅接受化疗(平均费用为47,625美元)的患者相比,先后接受靶向治疗和免疫治疗的患者总费用更高(平均为172,828美元)。正如预期的那样,生存期延长意味着更多的三线治疗(P<0.001),且与癌症相关的住院平均费用更高(化疗为24,554美元,免疫治疗为31,835美元,靶向治疗为28,228美元,两种治疗联合为35,494美元)。然而,费用并未与生存获益成比例增加。尽管生存期延长,但接受靶向治疗或免疫治疗的患者的住院次数中位数和住院时长与仅接受化疗的患者相似。
接受晚期NSCLC现代治疗的患者生存率更高,但费用也更高。为控制费用,尤其是在发展中国家,有必要界定成本效益阈值。