Ngeh Ngeh Etienne, Wiysahnyuy Ayuba Berinyuy, Tito Emmanuel
Physiotherapy, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, GBR.
Physical Therapy, St. Louis University Institute of Health and Biomedical Sciences, Douala, CMR.
Cureus. 2025 Feb 26;17(2):e79709. doi: 10.7759/cureus.79709. eCollection 2025 Feb.
Objective This study aimed to assess cardiovascular risk factors (CVRFs) among healthcare professionals (HCPs) practicing at the Bamenda Regional Hospital (BRH) in Bamenda, Cameroon. Methodology This was a hospital-based cross-sectional study involving HCPs practicing at the BRH. Data on lifestyle risk factors were collected across several units and services of the BRH by using a modified Health Improvement Card (HIC). Results A total of 237 participants were included in the final analysis; most were female (59.1%). The mean age of the sample was 30.1 ± 5.8 years. Based on the HIC, most HCPs were in the medium-risk zone (54.0%) for diet; in the high-risk zone for physical activity (68.4%); and in the low-risk zone for tobacco use and alcohol consumption (97.9% and 82.3%, respectively). The risk of developing cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) increases from a low to high-risk level. The mean HIC score was 10.3 ± 1.8 in males), and 10.2 ± 1.7 in females (p=0.781). The age group of 20-30 years had the lowest HIC score, with a mean of 9.9 ± 1.6; those over 40 years had higher HIC scores, with a mean of 11.5 ± 1.4 (p=0.000). When HIC CVRFs were quantified (higher score indicates higher risk), the HIC scores were highest in physicians (11.0 ± 1.8), followed by pharmacists (11.0 ± 1.4) and nurses (10.5 ± 1.7), and lowest in physiotherapists (8.0 ± 1.1) (p=0.000). Regarding socioeconomic status, the mean HIC scores were highest for the upper class (11.5 ± 1.3), followed by the middle (10.0 ± 1.9) and lower classes (10.0 ± 1.7) (p=0.013). Conclusions Most participants were in the low-risk zone for BMI and alcohol and tobacco use; in the moderate-risk zone for healthy diet and blood pressure; and the high-risk zone for physical activity and exercise. Physicians exhibited higher levels of CVRFs compared to other healthcare professionals. Furthermore, high socioeconomic status was associated with a high risk of CVD. Our findings identify opportunities for targeted training and effective interventions to reduce the burden of CVDs among HCPs and beyond and maximize their potential as health educators and influencers with their patients and students.
目的 本研究旨在评估在喀麦隆巴门达地区医院(BRH)工作的医护人员(HCPs)的心血管危险因素(CVRFs)。方法 这是一项基于医院的横断面研究,涉及在BRH工作的HCPs。通过使用改良的健康改善卡(HIC),在BRH的多个科室和服务部门收集生活方式危险因素的数据。结果 共有237名参与者纳入最终分析;大多数为女性(59.1%)。样本的平均年龄为30.1±5.8岁。根据HIC,大多数HCPs在饮食方面处于中度风险区(54.0%);在身体活动方面处于高风险区(68.4%);在烟草使用和酒精消费方面处于低风险区(分别为97.9%和82.3%)。患心血管疾病(CVDs)的风险从低风险水平到高风险水平逐渐增加。男性的平均HIC评分为10.3±1.8,女性为10.2±1.7(p = 0.781)。20 - 30岁年龄组的HIC评分最低,平均为9.9±1.6;40岁以上者的HIC评分较高,平均为11.5±1.4(p = 0.000)。当对HIC CVRFs进行量化时(分数越高风险越高),医生的HIC评分最高(11.0±1.8),其次是药剂师(11.0±1.4)和护士(10.5±1.7),物理治疗师的评分最低(8.0±1.1)(p = 0.000)。关于社会经济地位,上层阶级的平均HIC评分最高(11.5±1.3),其次是中层(10.0±1.9)和下层阶级(10.0±1.7)(p = 0.013)。结论 大多数参与者在体重指数、酒精和烟草使用方面处于低风险区;在健康饮食和血压方面处于中度风险区;在身体活动和锻炼方面处于高风险区。与其他医护人员相比,医生表现出更高水平的CVRFs。此外,高社会经济地位与CVD的高风险相关。我们的研究结果确定了有针对性的培训和有效干预措施的机会,以减轻HCPs及其他人群的CVD负担,并最大限度地发挥他们作为健康教育者和对患者及学生有影响力者的潜力。