Ashaye Ajibade, Shi Ling, Aldoss Ibrahim, Montesinos Pau, Vachhani Pankit, Rocha Vanderson, Papayannidis Cristina, Leonard Jessica T, Baer Maria R, Ribera Jose-Maria, McCloskey James, Wang Jianxiang, Rane Deepali, Guo Shien
Takeda Development Center Americas Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Evidera Inc., Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Cancer Med. 2025 Apr;14(7):e70780. doi: 10.1002/cam4.70780.
In the phase 3 ponatinib-3001 trial (PhALLCON, NCT03589326), ponatinib demonstrated superior efficacy over imatinib with comparable safety in patients with newly diagnosed Philadelphia-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ ALL). This post hoc analysis evaluated the net benefits of ponatinib using a quality-adjusted time without symptoms of disease or toxicity (Q-TWiST) approach.
Overall survival (OS) time for patients from PhALLCON was partitioned into three health states: TOX (time with grade 3+ treatment-emergent adverse events [TEAEs] before disease progression), TWiST (time without toxicity before progression), and REL (time from progression until death or end of follow-up). Q-TWiST was calculated as the sum of health utility-weighted restricted mean durations of the three states. A relative Q-TWiST gain of ≥ 10% was considered clinically important. Sensitivity analyses were conducted by varying TOX and REL utilities, follow-up time, and the TOX definition (using grade 2+ TEAEs or patient-perceived treatment tolerability assessed by the FACT-GP5).
Among all randomized patients (ponatinib n = 164, imatinib n = 81), restricted mean OS was similar between arms (1082.2 vs. 1024.8 days; p = 0.373). In the base-case analysis, mean TWiST was 214.5 days longer with ponatinib versus imatinib (95% CI 70.3-358.7; p = 0.004), REL was shorter by 175.9 days (325.4-26.5; p = 0.021), and TOX was not significantly different between arms (p = 0.228). The relative Q-TWiST gain (10.98%) was clinically important. Sensitivity analyses consistently supported the robustness of the base-case findings.
Ponatinib may prolong quality-adjusted survival compared with imatinib, supporting the benefit-risk profile of ponatinib as a front-line treatment for Ph+ ALL.
NCT03589326.
在3期波纳替尼-3001试验(PhALLCON,NCT03589326)中,对于新诊断的费城染色体阳性急性淋巴细胞白血病(Ph+ ALL)患者,波纳替尼显示出优于伊马替尼的疗效,且安全性相当。这项事后分析采用质量调整无疾病或毒性症状时间(Q-TWiST)方法评估了波纳替尼的净效益。
将来自PhALLCON试验患者的总生存期(OS)分为三种健康状态:TOX(疾病进展前3级及以上治疗引发不良事件[TEAE]的时间)、TWiST(进展前无毒性的时间)和REL(从进展到死亡或随访结束的时间)。Q-TWiST计算为这三种状态的健康效用加权受限平均持续时间之和。相对Q-TWiST增益≥10%被认为具有临床意义。通过改变TOX和REL效用、随访时间以及TOX定义(使用2级及以上TEAE或通过FACT-GP5评估的患者感知治疗耐受性)进行敏感性分析。
在所有随机分组的患者中(波纳替尼组n = 164,伊马替尼组n = 81),两组的受限平均OS相似(1082.2天对1024.8天;p = 0.373)。在基础分析中,与伊马替尼相比,波纳替尼的平均TWiST长214.5天(95% CI 70.3 - 358.7;p = 0.004),REL短175.9天(325.4 - 26.5;p = 0.021),两组间TOX无显著差异(p = 0.228)。相对Q-TWiST增益(10.98%)具有临床意义。敏感性分析一致支持基础分析结果的稳健性。
与伊马替尼相比,波纳替尼可能延长质量调整生存期,支持波纳替尼作为Ph+ ALL一线治疗的效益风险概况。
NCT03589326。