Suppr超能文献

初诊费城染色体阳性急性淋巴细胞白血病患者无疾病或毒性症状的质量调整时间(Q-TWiST):波纳替尼与伊马替尼的比较

Quality-Adjusted Time Without Symptoms of Disease or Toxicity (Q-TWiST) in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: A Comparison of Ponatinib Versus Imatinib.

作者信息

Ashaye Ajibade, Shi Ling, Aldoss Ibrahim, Montesinos Pau, Vachhani Pankit, Rocha Vanderson, Papayannidis Cristina, Leonard Jessica T, Baer Maria R, Ribera Jose-Maria, McCloskey James, Wang Jianxiang, Rane Deepali, Guo Shien

机构信息

Takeda Development Center Americas Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.

Evidera Inc., Bethesda, Maryland, USA.

出版信息

Cancer Med. 2025 Apr;14(7):e70780. doi: 10.1002/cam4.70780.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In the phase 3 ponatinib-3001 trial (PhALLCON, NCT03589326), ponatinib demonstrated superior efficacy over imatinib with comparable safety in patients with newly diagnosed Philadelphia-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ ALL). This post hoc analysis evaluated the net benefits of ponatinib using a quality-adjusted time without symptoms of disease or toxicity (Q-TWiST) approach.

METHODS

Overall survival (OS) time for patients from PhALLCON was partitioned into three health states: TOX (time with grade 3+ treatment-emergent adverse events [TEAEs] before disease progression), TWiST (time without toxicity before progression), and REL (time from progression until death or end of follow-up). Q-TWiST was calculated as the sum of health utility-weighted restricted mean durations of the three states. A relative Q-TWiST gain of ≥ 10% was considered clinically important. Sensitivity analyses were conducted by varying TOX and REL utilities, follow-up time, and the TOX definition (using grade 2+ TEAEs or patient-perceived treatment tolerability assessed by the FACT-GP5).

RESULTS

Among all randomized patients (ponatinib n = 164, imatinib n = 81), restricted mean OS was similar between arms (1082.2 vs. 1024.8 days; p = 0.373). In the base-case analysis, mean TWiST was 214.5 days longer with ponatinib versus imatinib (95% CI 70.3-358.7; p = 0.004), REL was shorter by 175.9 days (325.4-26.5; p = 0.021), and TOX was not significantly different between arms (p = 0.228). The relative Q-TWiST gain (10.98%) was clinically important. Sensitivity analyses consistently supported the robustness of the base-case findings.

CONCLUSION

Ponatinib may prolong quality-adjusted survival compared with imatinib, supporting the benefit-risk profile of ponatinib as a front-line treatment for Ph+ ALL.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT03589326.

摘要

背景

在3期波纳替尼-3001试验(PhALLCON,NCT03589326)中,对于新诊断的费城染色体阳性急性淋巴细胞白血病(Ph+ ALL)患者,波纳替尼显示出优于伊马替尼的疗效,且安全性相当。这项事后分析采用质量调整无疾病或毒性症状时间(Q-TWiST)方法评估了波纳替尼的净效益。

方法

将来自PhALLCON试验患者的总生存期(OS)分为三种健康状态:TOX(疾病进展前3级及以上治疗引发不良事件[TEAE]的时间)、TWiST(进展前无毒性的时间)和REL(从进展到死亡或随访结束的时间)。Q-TWiST计算为这三种状态的健康效用加权受限平均持续时间之和。相对Q-TWiST增益≥10%被认为具有临床意义。通过改变TOX和REL效用、随访时间以及TOX定义(使用2级及以上TEAE或通过FACT-GP5评估的患者感知治疗耐受性)进行敏感性分析。

结果

在所有随机分组的患者中(波纳替尼组n = 164,伊马替尼组n = 81),两组的受限平均OS相似(1082.2天对1024.8天;p = 0.373)。在基础分析中,与伊马替尼相比,波纳替尼的平均TWiST长214.5天(95% CI 70.3 - 358.7;p = 0.004),REL短175.9天(325.4 - 26.5;p = 0.021),两组间TOX无显著差异(p = 0.228)。相对Q-TWiST增益(10.98%)具有临床意义。敏感性分析一致支持基础分析结果的稳健性。

结论

与伊马替尼相比,波纳替尼可能延长质量调整生存期,支持波纳替尼作为Ph+ ALL一线治疗的效益风险概况。

试验注册

NCT03589326。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0278/11958597/1d6d6743e56a/CAM4-14-e70780-g001.jpg

相似文献

8
Ponatinib versus imatinib for newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukaemia: an international, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial.
Lancet Oncol. 2016 May;17(5):612-21. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)00080-2. Epub 2016 Apr 12.

本文引用的文献

1
The FACT-GP5 as a global tolerability measure: responsiveness and robustness to missing assessments.
Qual Life Res. 2024 Oct;33(10):2869-2880. doi: 10.1007/s11136-024-03740-x. Epub 2024 Jul 24.
3
Patient-Reported Adverse Events and Early Treatment Discontinuation Among Patients With Multiple Myeloma.
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Mar 4;7(3):e243854. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.3854.
4
ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline interim update on the use of targeted therapy in acute lymphoblastic leukaemia.
Ann Oncol. 2024 Jan;35(1):15-28. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2023.09.3112. Epub 2023 Oct 11.
6
The evolution of acute lymphoblastic leukemia research and therapy at MD Anderson over four decades.
J Hematol Oncol. 2023 Mar 16;16(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s13045-023-01409-5.
8
How do patients interpret and respond to a single-item global indicator of cancer treatment tolerability?
Support Care Cancer. 2022 Dec 16;31(1):37. doi: 10.1007/s00520-022-07484-7.
9
Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.
N Engl J Med. 2022 Jun 23;386(25):2399-2411. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra2113347.
10
Validity of a single-item indicator of treatment side effect bother in a diverse sample of cancer patients.
Support Care Cancer. 2022 Apr;30(4):3613-3623. doi: 10.1007/s00520-022-06802-3. Epub 2022 Jan 14.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验