Suppr超能文献

美国医学院教职员工是否执行了医学协会提出的带薪育儿假建议?

Are medical associations' paid parental leave recommendations instituted for United States medical school faculty?

作者信息

Gurley Hannah, Lufler Rebecca S, Goldberg Brian J, Ferrigno Christopher, Wilson Adam B

机构信息

Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.

Department of Medical Education, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

Med Educ Online. 2025 Dec;30(1):2487656. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2025.2487656. Epub 2025 Apr 2.

Abstract

Longer paid parental leaves have many well-documented biopsychosocial benefits for parents and children. However, many United States (U.S.) employers do not offer 8-12 weeks of paid parental leave as recommended by medical associations such as The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, the American Academy of Pediatrics, and the American Medical Association. This study compared and summarized the quality of parental leave policies offered across U.S. allopathic medical schools to determine their alignment with medical associations' recommendations. Parental leave policies were analyzed to determine 1) whether employers offered standalone parental leave policies and/or relied on the Family Medical Leave Act, 2) who received parental leave, 3) whether leave was paid or unpaid, and 4) the number of paid weeks offered, if any. Differences in leave durations were compared according to Carnegie classifications, school control, and geographic region. Of the 134 (85.9%; 134/156) allopathic medical schools with retrievable policies, one-fifth (21.6%; 29/134) offered 12 weeks or more of fully compensated birthing parent leave. Schools offered an average of 6.72 weeks (median = 6) of paid birthing parent leave and 5.82 weeks (median = 6) of paid non-birthing parent leave. Private ( < 0.001) and Northeast ( < 0.001) schools offered more weeks of paid birthing parent leave. Despite the benefits of longer paid parental leaves, over three-quarters of parental leave policies used by allopathic medical schools did not offer faculty 12 weeks of fully paid birthing parent (78.4%; 105/134) or non-birthing parent leave (84.3%; 113/134). This suggests that most parental leave policies offered to academic medicine faculty are misaligned with medical associations' recommendations.

摘要

更长时间的带薪育儿假对父母和孩子有着诸多有充分记录的生物心理社会益处。然而,许多美国雇主并未按照美国妇产科医师学会、美国儿科学会和美国医学协会等医学协会的建议,提供8至12周的带薪育儿假。本研究比较并总结了美国所有opathic医学院提供的育儿假政策质量,以确定其是否符合医学协会的建议。对育儿假政策进行分析,以确定:1)雇主是否提供独立的育儿假政策和/或是否依赖《家庭医疗休假法》;2)哪些人可享受育儿假;3)休假是带薪还是无薪;4)若有带薪休假,提供的带薪周数。根据卡内基分类、学校管理类型和地理区域比较休假时长的差异。在134所(85.9%;134/156)有可检索政策的opathic医学院中,五分之一(21.6%;29/134)提供12周或更长时间的全额补偿生育父母假。学校提供的生育父母带薪假平均为6.72周(中位数 = 6),非生育父母带薪假平均为5.82周(中位数 = 6)。私立学校(<0.001)和东北部学校(<0.001)提供的生育父母带薪周数更多。尽管更长时间的带薪育儿假有诸多益处,但opathic医学院使用的四分之三以上的育儿假政策并未为教职员工提供12周的全额带薪生育父母假(78.4%;105/134)或非生育父母假(84.3%;113/134)。这表明,提供给学术医学教职员工的大多数育儿假政策与医学协会的建议不一致。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/769c/11966969/c34b193984a8/ZMEO_A_2487656_F0001_OC.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验