Sur Souvik, Nimesh Hemlata
Research and Development Center, Teerthanker Mahaveer University, Moradabad, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Amity Institute of Pharmacy, Amity University, Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Adv Pharmacol. 2025;103:415-428. doi: 10.1016/bs.apha.2025.02.002. Epub 2025 Feb 19.
Molecular Modelling in Drug Designing or Computer Aided Drug Designing (CADD) plays a significant role in new drug identification in the current world. However, it has sensitivity challenges and limitation because theoretical models involve assumption and approximations Computational models are not very accurate, some of the major challenges that face these models include the following. These include, for instance, molecular-docking or molecular-dynamics-simulation models which may not represent an accurate biological system and thus the predictions will be wrong. CADD depends on the availability of accurate, high-quality structural information for target proteins and ligand. Unfortunately, there are instances when experimental structures are not available, and homology models are employed, which can be imprecise. The computational cost is another drawback; only high accuracy simulations call for huge amounts of computational power and time well-suited for screening a multitude of agents. Moreover, they have weaknesses in determining pharmacokinetic and toxicity patterns of compounds that influence drug performance and effectiveness. In other words, even though CADD greatly helps drug discovery, it is still constrained by experimental validation to solve its drawbacks and optimize its foretelling.
分子建模在药物设计或计算机辅助药物设计(CADD)中,在当今世界新药识别方面发挥着重要作用。然而,它存在敏感性挑战和局限性,因为理论模型涉及假设和近似值,计算模型不是非常准确,这些模型面临的一些主要挑战如下。例如,分子对接或分子动力学模拟模型可能无法代表准确的生物系统,因此预测会出错。CADD依赖于目标蛋白和配体的准确、高质量结构信息的可用性。不幸的是,有时无法获得实验结构,就会采用同源模型,而同源模型可能不准确。计算成本是另一个缺点;只有高精度模拟需要大量的计算能力和时间,适合筛选大量药物。此外,它们在确定影响药物性能和有效性的化合物的药代动力学和毒性模式方面存在弱点。换句话说,尽管CADD极大地帮助了药物发现,但它仍然受到实验验证的限制,以解决其缺点并优化其预测。