Sun Yi, Bochmann Frank, Eckert Winfried, Ernst Benjamin, Freitag Christian, Kaulbars Uwe, Nigmann Uwe, Samel Christina, van den Berg Christian, Raffler Nastaran
Unit Exposure Monitoring and Cause-Effect Relationships, Institute for Occupational Safety and Health of the German Social Accident Insurance (IFA), Sankt Augustin, Germany.
German Social Accident Insurance Institution for the Building Trade, Stuttgart, Germany.
Saf Health Work. 2025 Mar;16(1):97-104. doi: 10.1016/j.shaw.2025.01.001. Epub 2025 Jan 4.
Standardized exposure assessments were conducted to quantify the historical occupational exposure to hand-arm vibration of workers in the German construction, underground coal mining, woodworking, and metalworking industries.
A two-step approach was used to assess historical vibration exposure. In the first step, individual work histories were reconstructed by standardized personal interviews. The interview focused on the identification of relevant power tools used throughout the working life. In the second step, an equipment-exposure-matrix was constructed by industrial hygiene measurements. By linking the power tools in the work history to the equipment-exposure-matrix, individual daily, and long-term vibration exposures can be quantified.
A total of 423 power tools were identified for 5,115 exposure segments over a period of 50 years. 97.2% of the vibration values were based on industrial hygiene measurements. The total vibration value (a) of the power tools used varied between 0.8 m/s and 65.2 m/s with a median value of 14.2 m/s. The median value of cumulative vibration exposure is D = 121,971 (range: 23-3,374,640) m/s·day, corresponding to a daily vibration exposure of a = 7 m/s for 2489 working days (11.3 years).This study provides a detailed description of hand-arm vibration exposure among workers in the related industries studied. Our analyses indicate that the quantification of daily vibration exposure is often uncertain and should be interpreted with caution. In contrast, cumulative vibration exposure is a more reliable exposure parameter for describing general working conditions and for guiding the prevention and compensation of vibration-related health problems.
开展了标准化暴露评估,以量化德国建筑、地下煤矿开采、木工和金属加工行业工人过去的手臂振动职业暴露情况。
采用两步法评估过去的振动暴露情况。第一步,通过标准化的个人访谈重建个人工作经历。访谈重点是确定整个工作生涯中使用的相关电动工具。第二步,通过工业卫生测量构建设备-暴露矩阵。通过将工作经历中的电动工具与设备-暴露矩阵相联系,可量化个人每日和长期的振动暴露情况。
在50年期间,共识别出423种电动工具用于5115个暴露时间段。97.2%的振动值基于工业卫生测量。所使用电动工具的总振动值(a)在0.8米/秒至65.2米/秒之间变化,中位数为14.2米/秒。累积振动暴露的中位数为D = 121971(范围:23 - 3374640)米/秒·天,相当于2489个工作日(11.3年)每日振动暴露为a = 7米/秒。本研究详细描述了所研究相关行业工人的手臂振动暴露情况。我们的分析表明,每日振动暴露的量化往往不确定,应谨慎解读。相比之下,累积振动暴露是描述一般工作条件以及指导与振动相关健康问题预防和补偿的更可靠暴露参数。