Suppr超能文献

孤立性中脑膜动脉栓塞术与非创伤性硬膜下血肿保守治疗的对比

Standalone Middle Meningeal Artery Embolization Versus Conservative Management for Nontraumatic Subdural Hematoma.

作者信息

Chen Huanwen, Khunte Mihir, Colasurdo Marco, Malhotra Ajay, Gandhi Dheeraj

机构信息

Division of Neurointerventional Surgery, Department of Neurosurgery, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore (H.C., D.G.).

Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI (M.K.).

出版信息

Stroke. 2025 Jun;56(6):1404-1412. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.124.050190. Epub 2025 Apr 3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Recent randomized control trials have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of middle meningeal artery embolization (MMAE) as an adjunct to conventional management for patients with nonacute subdural hematoma (SDH); however, a large majority of trial participants received surgical evacuation as part of the standard of care. Thus, the efficacy and safety of standalone MMAE compared with conservative management (CM) for patients with nonsurgical SDH are unclear.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of the 2019 to 2021 Nationwide Readmissions Database in the United States. Patients with nonsurgical nontraumatic SDH were identified, and MMAE patients were matched with similar CM patients using propensity scores calculated from demographics, comorbidities, and initial hospitalization outcomes. Patients were followed up to 300 days. The primary end point was composite surgical rescue or death, and secondary end points included surgical rescue and all-cause mortality by 180 days.

RESULTS

A total of 24 465 patients with nonsurgical nontraumatic SDH were identified; 2228 (9.1%) underwent MMAE. After propensity score matching, 6675 patients remained in the CM group and 2217 in the MMAE group. At 180 days, MMAE patients had a significantly lower risk of surgery or death compared with CM (8.2% versus 10.9%; relative risk, 0.75 [95% CI, 0.59-0.96]; =0.022) and lower risk of death (1.1% versus 3.0%; relative risk, 0.38 [95% CI, 0.17-0.86]; =0.020). Rates of surgical rescue among MMAE and CM patients at 180 days were similar (7.1% versus 8.4%; relative risk, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.63-1.14]; =0.27). Time-to-event analyses for the entire 300-day study follow-up period confirmed that while MMAE was associated with a lower cumulative risk of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio, 0.55 [95% CI, 0.35-0.87]; =0.010), it was not associated with a different risk of surgical rescue (hazard ratio, 1.00 [95% CI, 0.76-1.31]; =1.00).

CONCLUSIONS

Standalone MMAE may be beneficial for patients with nonsurgical nontraumatic SDH by reducing the long-term risk of all-cause mortality.

摘要

背景

近期的随机对照试验已证明,脑膜中动脉栓塞术(MMAE)作为非急性硬膜下血肿(SDH)患者传统治疗的辅助手段,具有有效性和安全性;然而,大多数试验参与者接受了手术清除血肿作为标准治疗的一部分。因此,对于非手术治疗的SDH患者,单独使用MMAE与保守治疗(CM)相比的有效性和安全性尚不清楚。

方法

这是一项对2019年至2021年美国全国再入院数据库的回顾性队列研究。确定了非手术非创伤性SDH患者,并使用根据人口统计学、合并症和初始住院结局计算的倾向得分,将接受MMAE治疗的患者与类似的CM患者进行匹配。对患者进行了长达300天的随访。主要终点是综合手术挽救或死亡,次要终点包括180天时的手术挽救和全因死亡率。

结果

共确定了24465例非手术非创伤性SDH患者;2228例(9.1%)接受了MMAE治疗。经过倾向得分匹配后,CM组有6675例患者,MMAE组有2217例患者。在180天时,与CM组相比,MMAE组患者手术或死亡风险显著降低(8.2%对10.9%;相对风险,0.75[95%CI,0.59 - 0.96];P = 0.022),死亡风险也更低(1.1%对3.0%;相对风险,0.38[95%CI,0.17 - 0.86];P = 0.020)。180天时,MMAE组和CM组患者手术挽救率相似(7.1%对8.4%;相对风险,0.85[95%CI,

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验