Zhang Yanchen, Yu Qiong, Renshaw Tyler, Li Huijuan, Fallon Lindsay, Jiang Xu
Department of Psychological & Quantitative Foundations, University of Iowa, 361 Lindquist Center, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.
Queens College, City University of New York, 65-30 Kissena Blvd, Queens, NY 11367, USA.
J Sch Psychol. 2025 Apr;109:101428. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2025.101428. Epub 2025 Feb 13.
International literature indicates that adolescents' subjective well-being (SWB) is associated with their academic and social-emotional development. Teachers are a central source of social influence on adolescents' school-specific SWB. However, little is known about the multilevel associations between adolescents' and their teachers' school-specific SWB, especially in collectivist cultures. This international collaborative study examined the multilevel associations between adolescents' and their teachers' school-specific SWB. Using a stratified random sample from a public secondary school in China (n = 1181, n = 44), we surveyed teachers' and their students' school-specific SWB and general SWB (i.e., satisfaction with life and general self-efficacy). Random-intercept-only multilevel models were fitted to delineate the cross-level associations between teachers' (Level-2 predictors) and adolescents' overall and dimensional school-specific SWB (Level-1 outcomes) while partialing out adolescents' general SWB and demographics (e.g., student gender, age). Significant within-class similarities were found in adolescents' overall and dimensional school-specific SWB (i.e., joy of learning, student school connectedness, academic self-efficacy, and educational purpose). At the class level, teachers' school-specific SWB and teaching experience were positively associated with adolescents' school-specific SWB. At the individual level, adolescents' school-specific SWB was positively associated with their life satisfaction and general self-efficacy, but not with their demographics. Implications of findings and future directions are discussed to inform researchers, practitioners, and policymakers about the significance of multidimensional measures of SWB and a whole-school approach to promoting the SWB of an entire school population (e.g., students, teachers).
国际文献表明,青少年的主观幸福感(SWB)与其学业及社会情感发展相关。教师是对青少年特定学校主观幸福感产生社会影响的核心来源。然而,对于青少年与其教师的特定学校主观幸福感之间的多层次关联,我们知之甚少,尤其是在集体主义文化背景下。这项国际合作研究考察了青少年与其教师的特定学校主观幸福感之间的多层次关联。我们从中国一所公立中学选取了分层随机样本(学生1181名,教师44名),调查了教师及其学生的特定学校主观幸福感和总体主观幸福感(即生活满意度和一般自我效能感)。我们拟合了仅包含随机截距的多层次模型,以描绘教师(第二层预测变量)与青少年总体及各维度特定学校主观幸福感(第一层结果变量)之间的跨层次关联,同时排除青少年的总体主观幸福感和人口统计学特征(如学生性别、年龄)。研究发现,青少年总体及各维度特定学校主观幸福感(即学习乐趣、学生与学校的联系、学业自我效能感和教育目的)在班级内部存在显著相似性。在班级层面,教师的特定学校主观幸福感和教学经验与青少年的特定学校主观幸福感呈正相关。在个体层面,青少年的特定学校主观幸福感与他们的生活满意度和一般自我效能感呈正相关,但与他们的人口统计学特征无关。我们讨论了研究结果的意义及未来方向,以便让研究人员、从业者和政策制定者了解主观幸福感多维测量以及采用全校方法提升全体学校人群(如学生、教师)主观幸福感的重要性。