Wadhwa Meenu, Cludts Isabelle, Atkinson Eleanor, Rigsby Peter
Biotherapeutics and Advanced Therapies Group, R&D Division, Science and Research, Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA), South Mimms, United Kingdom.
Analytical and Biological Sciences Group, R&D Division, Science and Research, Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA), South Mimms, United Kingdom.
Front Immunol. 2025 Mar 20;16:1550655. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1550655. eCollection 2025.
Immunogenicity testing for anti-drug antibodies (ADA) is mandatory for regulatory approval of a biotherapeutic and can, in some instances, continue post-licensure. Typical examples are TNF inhibitors where biotherapeutic and ADA levels are relevant in clinical decision-making for optimal patient therapy. However, challenges with non-comparability of results due to plethora of bioanalytical techniques and the lack of standardization has hindered ADA monitoring in clinical practice. Two human anti-infliximab monoclonal antibodies (A, B) with defined characteristics were therefore lyophilized and assessed for suitability as a reference panel for ADA assays in an international study. Binding assays included the simple ELISA and common electrochemiluminescence (ECL) to the rare antigen binding test and lateral flow assays. For neutralisation, competitive ligand binding and reporter-gene assays were employed. Sample testing (e.g., antibodies, sera) showed differential reactivity depending on the assay and sample. Estimates for ADA levels using in-house standards varied substantially among assays/laboratories. In contrast, using antibody A for quantitating ADA levels reduced the interlaboratory variability and provided largely consistent estimates. The degree of harmonization was dependent on the assay, sample and the laboratory. Importantly, antibody A allowed ADA detection when missed using in-house standards. Recognition of sample B varied, possibly due to its fast dissociation. Overall, the panel comprising A (coded 19/234) and B (coded 19/232) was suitable and established by the WHO Expert Committee on Biological Standardization in October 2022 as the WHO international reference panel for infliximab ADA assays. Sample A (coded 19/234) with an arbitrarily assigned unitage of 50,000IU/ampoule for binding activity and 50,000 IU/ampoule for neutralising activity is intended as a 'common standard' for assay characterization and where possible for calibration of anti-infliximab preparations to facilitate comparison and harmonization of results across infliximab ADA assays. Sample B (19/232) with its unique characteristics and variable detection but no assigned unitage is intended for assessing the suitability of the assay for detecting ADAs with fast dissociation. It is anticipated that this panel would help towards selecting and characterizing suitable assays, benchmarking of in-house standards where feasible and in harmonizing ADA assays used in clinical practice for better patient outcome globally.
抗药物抗体(ADA)的免疫原性检测对于生物治疗药物的监管批准至关重要,在某些情况下,在获得许可后仍可继续进行。典型的例子是肿瘤坏死因子(TNF)抑制剂,其中生物治疗药物和ADA水平在优化患者治疗的临床决策中具有相关性。然而,由于大量生物分析技术以及缺乏标准化导致结果不可比的问题,阻碍了临床实践中的ADA监测。因此,两种具有明确特征的人源抗英夫利昔单抗单克隆抗体(A、B)被冻干,并在一项国际研究中评估其作为ADA检测参考品的适用性。结合试验包括简单酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)、常见的电化学发光(ECL)、罕见抗原结合试验和侧向流动试验。对于中和作用,采用了竞争性配体结合试验和报告基因试验。样本检测(如抗体、血清)显示,根据试验和样本的不同,反应性存在差异。使用内部标准对ADA水平进行的估计在不同试验/实验室之间差异很大。相比之下,使用抗体A定量ADA水平可降低实验室间的变异性,并提供基本一致的估计值。协调程度取决于试验、样本和实验室。重要的是,当使用内部标准未检测到ADA时,抗体A能够检测到ADA。对样本B的识别存在差异,可能是由于其快速解离。总体而言,由A(编码19/234)和B(编码19/232)组成的参考品是合适的,并于2022年10月被世界卫生组织生物标准化专家委员会确立为英夫利昔单抗ADA检测的世界卫生组织国际参考品。样本A(编码19/234),其结合活性的任意指定单位为50,000IU/安瓿,中和活性为50,000IU/安瓿,旨在作为检测方法表征的“通用标准”,并在可能的情况下用于抗英夫利昔单抗制剂的校准,以促进英夫利昔单抗ADA检测结果的比较和协调。样本B(19/232)具有独特的特性和可变的检测结果,但未指定单位,旨在评估检测方法对检测快速解离的ADA的适用性。预计该参考品将有助于选择和表征合适的检测方法,在可行的情况下对内部标准进行基准测试,并协调临床实践中使用的ADA检测方法,以在全球范围内为患者带来更好的治疗结果。