Merdad Mazin, Al Taylouni Nada
Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery King Abdulaziz University Jeddah Saudi Arabia.
Medical Resident King Abdullah Medical Complex Jeddah Saudi Arabia.
Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2025 Apr 3;10(2):e70076. doi: 10.1002/lio2.70076. eCollection 2025 Apr.
This systematic review and meta-analysis investigated the role of elective neck dissection (END) in the salvage management of clinically N0 necks.
PubMed/Medline, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched for relevant studies.
Both electronic and manual search strategies were conducted within the abovementioned databases and included articles and reviews to find the relevant studies. Rates of occult nodal metastasis, survival outcomes, and postoperative complications were analyzed in N0 patients undergoing salvage laryngectomy with END. Fixed and random effects models were used to calculate pooled estimates of overall survival metastasis rates with 95% confidence intervals, and heterogeneity was assessed using tau, , and Cochran's test. Statistical analyses were performed in R software with < 0.05 as significant.
The included eight studies reported occult metastasis rates ranging from 4% to 10% in clinically N0 necks post-radiotherapy. Overall survival was approximately 52%, with mixed evidence on the survival advantage of END. Disease-free survival and recurrence-free survival rates ranged from 71.7% to 95.5% at 5 years. Complication rates associated with END were high, with up to 47.4% of patients experiencing postoperative morbidity. The metastasis rate was 10%-13% highlighting the ability of END to detect occult metastases.
The survival benefits of END are not consistently supported by current evidence, while the significant morbidity associated with the procedure raises concerns about its routine use. A conservative approach may be more appropriate for clinically node-negative patients, particularly when weighed against the elevated risks of complications. END demonstrates moderate overall survival rates and an ability to detect occult metastases, but its role in improving long-term outcomes remains unclear. Larger prospective studies and randomized trials are needed to better define the indications and outcomes of END in the salvage management of clinically N0 necks.
本系统评价和荟萃分析探讨了选择性颈清扫术(END)在临床N0颈部挽救性治疗中的作用。
系统检索了PubMed/Medline、谷歌学术和考克兰图书馆中的相关研究。
在上述数据库中同时采用电子和手工检索策略,纳入文章和综述以查找相关研究。对接受挽救性喉切除术加END的N0患者的隐匿性淋巴结转移率、生存结果和术后并发症进行分析。采用固定效应模型和随机效应模型计算总生存转移率的合并估计值及95%置信区间,并使用tau、I²和 Cochr an检验评估异质性。在R软件中进行统计分析,以P < 0.05为有统计学意义。
纳入的八项研究报告称,放疗后临床N0颈部的隐匿性转移率在4%至10%之间。总生存率约为52%,关于END生存优势的证据不一。5年无病生存率和无复发生存率在71.7%至95.5%之间。与END相关的并发症发生率较高,高达47.4%的患者出现术后发病。转移率为10% - 13%,突出了END检测隐匿性转移的能力。
目前的证据并不一致支持END的生存益处,而该手术相关的显著发病率引发了对其常规使用的担忧。对于临床淋巴结阴性的患者,保守方法可能更合适,尤其是考虑到并发症风险升高时。END显示出中等的总生存率和检测隐匿性转移的能力,但其在改善长期结局中的作用仍不明确。需要更大规模的前瞻性研究和随机试验,以更好地界定END在临床N0颈部挽救性治疗中的适应证和结局。