Bhat Saiuj, Weeda Lewis, Seth Ishith, Rozen Warren M
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
School of Medicine, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia.
J Hand Surg Glob Online. 2025 Jan 30;7(2):212-218. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2024.12.005. eCollection 2025 Mar.
To perform an updated systematic review investigating the various surgical and injection interventions for thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) joint arthritis.
A systematic literature search was conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases from inception to April 2024 to identify prospective, randomized studies comparing surgical and/or minimally invasive interventions for thumb CMC joint osteoarthritis with a minimum follow-up of 12 months. Reference lists of previous reviews were screened to identify additional publications. Qualitative analysis was performed for primary and secondary outcomes based on the direction of effect (statistically higher, lower, or no difference) because of marked heterogeneity of data and inadequate statistical power. Cochrane's risk of bias 2 tool assessed the quality of included studies.
Seventeen studies encompassing 1,166 thumbs were included in this review. Fourteen studies compared surgical interventions, whereas three studies compared various intra-articular injections. Five studies had a low risk of bias, eight had a moderate risk of bias, and four had a high risk of bias. Regarding primary outcomes, there was no difference in function between trapeziectomy and arthroplasty, key pinch strength between partial and total trapeziectomy, and pain and function between trapeziectomy and arthrodesis. Arthrodesis was associated with a higher complication rate compared with trapeziectomy. Platelet-rich plasma injections had improved pain, function, and patient satisfaction outcomes compared with corticosteroid injections.
No surgical intervention was superior to the other for treating the first CMC joint osteoarthritis. Trapeziectomy remains the simplest and one of the most established surgical modalities with good long-term outcomes and acceptable side effect profiles. Platelet-rich plasma injections may be a useful alternative to corticosteroids in first CMC osteoarthritis.
TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IB.
进行一项更新的系统评价,调查针对拇指腕掌(CMC)关节关节炎的各种手术和注射干预措施。
在MEDLINE、Embase、Web of Science和Cochrane数据库中进行系统文献检索,检索时间从数据库创建至2024年4月,以识别比较针对拇指CMC关节骨关节炎的手术和/或微创干预措施的前瞻性随机研究,且随访时间至少为12个月。筛选既往综述的参考文献列表以识别其他出版物。由于数据存在明显异质性且统计效能不足,基于效应方向(统计学上更高、更低或无差异)对主要和次要结局进行定性分析。Cochrane偏倚风险2工具评估纳入研究的质量。
本综述纳入了17项研究,共涉及1166例拇指。14项研究比较了手术干预措施,而3项研究比较了各种关节内注射。5项研究偏倚风险低,8项研究偏倚风险中等,4项研究偏倚风险高。关于主要结局,大多角骨切除术与关节成形术在功能方面无差异,部分大多角骨切除术与全大多角骨切除术在关键捏力方面无差异,大多角骨切除术与关节融合术在疼痛和功能方面无差异。与大多角骨切除术相比,关节融合术的并发症发生率更高。与皮质类固醇注射相比,富血小板血浆注射在疼痛、功能和患者满意度结局方面有所改善。
在治疗第一腕掌关节骨关节炎方面,没有一种手术干预措施优于其他措施。大多角骨切除术仍然是最简单且最成熟的手术方式之一,具有良好的长期效果和可接受的副作用。在第一腕掌关节骨关节炎中,富血小板血浆注射可能是皮质类固醇的一种有用替代方法。
研究类型/证据水平:治疗性IB级