文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

临床试验:新型钾竞争性酸阻滞剂谷氨酸利那普唑与兰索拉唑治疗糜烂性食管炎的剂量探索研究。

Clinical Trial: Dose-Finding Study of Linaprazan Glurate, A Novel Potassium-Competitive Acid Blocker, Versus Lansoprazole for the Treatment of Erosive Oesophagitis.

作者信息

Sharma Prateek, Vaezi Michael, Unge Peter, Andersson Kjell, Larsson Kajsa, Popadiyn Ivan, Rosenholm Maria, Rosztóczy Andras, Yektaei Elham, Armstrong David

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Leawood, Kansas, USA.

Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.

出版信息

Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2025 May;61(10):1590-1602. doi: 10.1111/apt.70109. Epub 2025 Apr 4.


DOI:10.1111/apt.70109
PMID:40183130
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12013784/
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Linaprazan glurate, a potassium-competitive acid blocker, is in development for the treatment of erosive oesophagitis and other acid-related diseases. AIM: To evaluate the 4-week healing rate and safety of four linaprazan glurate dosing regimens in patients with erosive oesophagitis. METHODS: This double-blind, dose-finding study compared linaprazan glurate to lansoprazole. We included patients with endoscopically confirmed erosive oesophagitis (validated by a central review board) if they had Los Angeles (LA) grade C/D or LA grade A/B with partial response to at least 8 weeks of proton pump inhibitor therapy. Patients were randomised to 4 weeks of linaprazan glurate (25, 50, 75 or 100 mg twice daily) or lansoprazole (30 mg once daily), followed by 4 weeks of open-label lansoprazole. RESULTS: Of 248 patients randomised, central review confirmed erosive oesophagitis in 182 at screening endoscopy. Across all doses, linaprazan glurate achieved a 4-week healing rate of 71.1% in intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis and 80.9% in per protocol (PP) analysis. In comparison, lansoprazole achieved healing rates of 60.6% (ITT) and 59.1% (PPS). The best performing linaprazan glurate dosing group outperformed lansoprazole by 28% in patients with LA grade A/B with partial PPI response and by more than 50% in patients with LA grade C/D. CONCLUSIONS: Linaprazan glurate demonstrated high 4-week healing rates compared to lansoprazole, with a good safety profile, supporting its further development. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05055128; EudraCT: 2020-003319-91.

摘要

背景:谷氨酸利那拉唑是一种钾离子竞争性酸阻滞剂,正在研发用于治疗糜烂性食管炎和其他酸相关疾病。 目的:评估四种谷氨酸利那拉唑给药方案对糜烂性食管炎患者的4周愈合率和安全性。 方法:这项双盲、剂量探索性研究将谷氨酸利那拉唑与兰索拉唑进行了比较。纳入经内镜确诊为糜烂性食管炎(由中央审查委员会确认)的患者,条件是他们患有洛杉矶(LA)分级C/D级或LA分级A/B级且对至少8周质子泵抑制剂治疗有部分反应。患者被随机分配接受4周的谷氨酸利那拉唑治疗(25、50、75或100毫克,每日两次)或兰索拉唑治疗(30毫克,每日一次),随后是4周的开放标签兰索拉唑治疗。 结果:在随机分组的248例患者中,中央审查在筛查内镜检查时确认182例患有糜烂性食管炎。在所有剂量组中,谷氨酸利那拉唑在意向性治疗(ITT)分析中的4周愈合率为71.1%,在符合方案(PP)分析中为80.9%。相比之下,兰索拉唑的愈合率分别为60.6%(ITT)和59.1%(PPS)。表现最佳的谷氨酸利那拉唑给药组在LA分级A/B级且对质子泵抑制剂有部分反应的患者中比兰索拉唑高出28%,在LA分级C/D级患者中高出50%以上。 结论:与兰索拉唑相比,谷氨酸利那拉唑显示出较高的4周愈合率,且安全性良好,支持其进一步研发。 试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT05055128;EudraCT:2020-003319-91。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/847b/12013784/d0941f9348e0/APT-61-1590-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/847b/12013784/b3723f0b2c27/APT-61-1590-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/847b/12013784/3e13d96ff129/APT-61-1590-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/847b/12013784/65b0718878b5/APT-61-1590-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/847b/12013784/03582cbd055e/APT-61-1590-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/847b/12013784/548775aa21a6/APT-61-1590-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/847b/12013784/d0941f9348e0/APT-61-1590-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/847b/12013784/b3723f0b2c27/APT-61-1590-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/847b/12013784/3e13d96ff129/APT-61-1590-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/847b/12013784/65b0718878b5/APT-61-1590-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/847b/12013784/03582cbd055e/APT-61-1590-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/847b/12013784/548775aa21a6/APT-61-1590-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/847b/12013784/d0941f9348e0/APT-61-1590-g004.jpg

相似文献

[1]
Clinical Trial: Dose-Finding Study of Linaprazan Glurate, A Novel Potassium-Competitive Acid Blocker, Versus Lansoprazole for the Treatment of Erosive Oesophagitis.

Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2025-5

[2]
Phase III, randomised, double-blind, multicentre study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of vonoprazan compared with lansoprazole in Asian patients with erosive oesophagitis.

Gut. 2019-8-13

[3]
Randomised clinical trial: a dose-ranging study of vonoprazan, a novel potassium-competitive acid blocker, vs. lansoprazole for the treatment of erosive oesophagitis.

Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2015-9

[4]
Randomised clinical trial: vonoprazan, a novel potassium-competitive acid blocker, vs. lansoprazole for the healing of erosive oesophagitis.

Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2016-1

[5]
Vonoprazan is superior to lansoprazole for healing of severe but not mild erosive esophagitis: A systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024-6

[6]
The efficacy and safety of keverprazan, a novel potassium-competitive acid blocker, in treating erosive oesophagitis: a phase III, randomised, double-blind multicentre study.

Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2022-6

[7]
Race affects healing of erosive oesophagitis in patients treated with proton pump inhibitors.

Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2011-6-20

[8]
Randomised clinical trial: vonoprazan versus lansoprazole for the initial relief of heartburn in patients with erosive oesophagitis.

Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2019-1

[9]
A Randomized, Comparative Trial of a Potassium-Competitive Acid Blocker (X842) and Lansoprazole for the Treatment of Patients With Erosive Esophagitis.

Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2025-4-1

[10]
Impact of oesophagitis classification in evaluating healing of erosive oesophagitis after therapy with proton pump inhibitors: a pooled analysis.

Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010-5

本文引用的文献

[1]
Mathematical model of the relationship between pH holding time and erosive esophagitis healing rates.

CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. 2025-1

[2]
AGA Clinical Practice Update on Integrating Potassium-Competitive Acid Blockers Into Clinical Practice: Expert Review.

Gastroenterology. 2024-11

[3]
ACG Clinical Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.

Am J Gastroenterol. 2022-1-1

[4]
Evaluation and Validation of the Modified Reflux Symptom Questionnaire-Electronic Diary in Patients With Persistent Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.

Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2020-1

[5]
Functional Esophageal Disorders.

Gastroenterology. 2016-2-15

[6]
Update on the epidemiology of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review.

Gut. 2013-7-13

[7]
Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Am J Gastroenterol. 2013-3

[8]
Systematic review of patient-reported outcome instruments for gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms.

Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013-1

[9]
Evolving issues in the management of reflux disease?

Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2009-7

[10]
A randomized, comparative trial of a potassium-competitive acid blocker (AZD0865) and esomeprazole for the treatment of patients with nonerosive reflux disease.

Am J Gastroenterol. 2008-1

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索