Sharma Prateek, Vaezi Michael, Unge Peter, Andersson Kjell, Larsson Kajsa, Popadiyn Ivan, Rosenholm Maria, Rosztóczy Andras, Yektaei Elham, Armstrong David
Department of Gastroenterology, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Leawood, Kansas, USA.
Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2025 May;61(10):1590-1602. doi: 10.1111/apt.70109. Epub 2025 Apr 4.
BACKGROUND: Linaprazan glurate, a potassium-competitive acid blocker, is in development for the treatment of erosive oesophagitis and other acid-related diseases. AIM: To evaluate the 4-week healing rate and safety of four linaprazan glurate dosing regimens in patients with erosive oesophagitis. METHODS: This double-blind, dose-finding study compared linaprazan glurate to lansoprazole. We included patients with endoscopically confirmed erosive oesophagitis (validated by a central review board) if they had Los Angeles (LA) grade C/D or LA grade A/B with partial response to at least 8 weeks of proton pump inhibitor therapy. Patients were randomised to 4 weeks of linaprazan glurate (25, 50, 75 or 100 mg twice daily) or lansoprazole (30 mg once daily), followed by 4 weeks of open-label lansoprazole. RESULTS: Of 248 patients randomised, central review confirmed erosive oesophagitis in 182 at screening endoscopy. Across all doses, linaprazan glurate achieved a 4-week healing rate of 71.1% in intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis and 80.9% in per protocol (PP) analysis. In comparison, lansoprazole achieved healing rates of 60.6% (ITT) and 59.1% (PPS). The best performing linaprazan glurate dosing group outperformed lansoprazole by 28% in patients with LA grade A/B with partial PPI response and by more than 50% in patients with LA grade C/D. CONCLUSIONS: Linaprazan glurate demonstrated high 4-week healing rates compared to lansoprazole, with a good safety profile, supporting its further development. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05055128; EudraCT: 2020-003319-91.
背景:谷氨酸利那拉唑是一种钾离子竞争性酸阻滞剂,正在研发用于治疗糜烂性食管炎和其他酸相关疾病。 目的:评估四种谷氨酸利那拉唑给药方案对糜烂性食管炎患者的4周愈合率和安全性。 方法:这项双盲、剂量探索性研究将谷氨酸利那拉唑与兰索拉唑进行了比较。纳入经内镜确诊为糜烂性食管炎(由中央审查委员会确认)的患者,条件是他们患有洛杉矶(LA)分级C/D级或LA分级A/B级且对至少8周质子泵抑制剂治疗有部分反应。患者被随机分配接受4周的谷氨酸利那拉唑治疗(25、50、75或100毫克,每日两次)或兰索拉唑治疗(30毫克,每日一次),随后是4周的开放标签兰索拉唑治疗。 结果:在随机分组的248例患者中,中央审查在筛查内镜检查时确认182例患有糜烂性食管炎。在所有剂量组中,谷氨酸利那拉唑在意向性治疗(ITT)分析中的4周愈合率为71.1%,在符合方案(PP)分析中为80.9%。相比之下,兰索拉唑的愈合率分别为60.6%(ITT)和59.1%(PPS)。表现最佳的谷氨酸利那拉唑给药组在LA分级A/B级且对质子泵抑制剂有部分反应的患者中比兰索拉唑高出28%,在LA分级C/D级患者中高出50%以上。 结论:与兰索拉唑相比,谷氨酸利那拉唑显示出较高的4周愈合率,且安全性良好,支持其进一步研发。 试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT05055128;EudraCT:2020-003319-91。
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2011-6-20
CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. 2025-1
Am J Gastroenterol. 2022-1-1
Gastroenterology. 2016-2-15
Am J Gastroenterol. 2013-3
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013-1
Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2009-7