Hu Xiao, McCrady Allison N, Bukovec Katherine E, Yuan Claire, Miller Emily Y, Bour Rachel K, Bruce Anthony C, Crump Katherine B, Peirce Shayn M, Grange Robert W, Blemker Silvia S
Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, United States of America.
Department of Human Nutrition, Foods, and Exercise and Metabolism Core, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2025 Apr 7;20(4):e0320901. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0320901. eCollection 2025.
Although eccentric contraction protocols are widely used to study the pathophysiology and potential treatments for Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD), they do not reflect the stresses, strains, strain rates, and excitation profiles that DMD muscles experience during human daily functional tasks, like walking. This limitation of eccentric contractions may impede our understanding of disease progression in DMD and proper assessment of treatment efficacy. The goals of this study were to examine the extent of force loss induced by a gait cycling protocol we developed, and compare to that from a typical eccentric contraction protocol in soleus and extensor digitorum longus (EDL) muscles of mdx mice. To achieve this goal, mdx soleus and EDL muscles were subjected to eccentric contractions at three levels of strain (10%, 20% and 30% optimal length Lo) and up to 200 cycles of our gait cycling protocol that mimicked the length changes and excitation patterns of the corresponding muscles during human walking gait. Our results showed that EDL but not soleus muscles had significant losses in isometric tetanic forces after the cycling protocols. Compared to the eccentric contraction protocol, the decrements in contractile performance from the cycling protocol were similar to those from the eccentric contractions at 10% in soleus and 20% Lo in EDL. Together, these results indicated the gait cycling protocol is a valuable experimental approach to better understand disease progression and to screen and evaluate efficacy of novel therapeutics for DMD.
尽管离心收缩方案被广泛用于研究杜氏肌营养不良症(DMD)的病理生理学和潜在治疗方法,但它们并不能反映DMD肌肉在人类日常功能任务(如行走)中所经历的应力、应变、应变率和兴奋情况。离心收缩的这一局限性可能会阻碍我们对DMD疾病进展的理解以及对治疗效果的正确评估。本研究的目的是检查我们开发的步态循环方案所导致的力量损失程度,并与mdx小鼠比目鱼肌和趾长伸肌(EDL)中典型离心收缩方案所导致的力量损失程度进行比较。为实现这一目标,mdx比目鱼肌和EDL肌肉在三个应变水平(10%、20%和30%最佳长度Lo)下进行离心收缩,并进行多达200个周期的我们的步态循环方案,该方案模拟了人类步行步态中相应肌肉的长度变化和兴奋模式。我们的结果表明,在循环方案后,EDL肌肉而非比目鱼肌的等长强直力量有显著损失。与离心收缩方案相比,循环方案导致的收缩性能下降与比目鱼肌10%应变和EDL肌肉20%Lo应变下的离心收缩所导致的下降相似。总之,这些结果表明步态循环方案是一种有价值的实验方法,有助于更好地理解疾病进展以及筛选和评估DMD新型治疗方法的疗效。