Mtenga Sally Mmanyi, Mashasi Irene, Kisia Lyagamula, Binyaruka Peter, Masanja Honorati, Mohamed Shukri F, Sanya Richard E, Mhalu Grace, Magembe Grace, Ramaiya Kaushik, Asiki Gershim, Mair Frances, Bunn Christopher, Gray Cindy M
Health System Impact Evaluation and Policy Department, Ifakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Chronic Diseases Management Unit, African Population and Health Research Center, Nairobi Kenya.
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2025 Apr 9;5(4):e0003876. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003876. eCollection 2025.
During COVID-19, people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) experienced increased vulnerability, including severe COVID-19 complications, disruptions in diabetes management, and social isolation. These aspects were heightened in many sub-Saharan African countries, such as Kenya and Tanzania, where healthcare systems already face critical challenges in coping with increasing non-communicable diseases (NCDs). Little is known about how people with T2D in these countries managed their diabetes or how the different approaches to COVID-19 control (Kenya imposed lockdown and curfew, whereas Tanzania adopted less strict measures) impacted their T2D management. This qualitative study aimed to compare the accounts of T2D patients in both countries to examine similarities and differences in the illness management challenges they faced during the COVID-19 pandemic.Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 52 patients (Kenya, n=22; Tanzania, n=30), and the transcripts were analyzed thematically. Despite different COVID-19 control measures, patients in both countries faced similar direct health challenges, such as difficulties accessing diabetic consultations and treatment, but they also experienced distinct socio-structural challenges. Direct health challenges included difficulties in accessing diabetic consultations and treatment, limited availability of diabetic medicine at health facilities and mental health distress. These were exacerbated by socio-structural challenges, many of which pre-dated COVID-19 but intensified during the pandemic. These included closure of diabetic clinics in Dar es Salaam, business instability, financial difficulties, health insurance challenges, higher food prices impacting patients' adherence to T2D dietary recommendations (in both countries), and price inflation of diabetic medicine and test kits (in Kenya). Together, these challenges led to patients practicing self-medication, missing doses and resulted in poor blood sugar control. People with T2D in Kenya and Tanzania have described similar illness management challenges. In both countries, future contingency planning is essential to ensure adequate routine management of T2D and to improve access to care in emergency situations. Affordable comprehensive health insurance, economic support, and psychosocial services are required to increase patient resilience and support the health and wellbeing of people with T2D.
在新冠疫情期间,2型糖尿病(T2D)患者面临的脆弱性增加,包括严重的新冠并发症、糖尿病管理中断以及社会隔离。在许多撒哈拉以南非洲国家,如肯尼亚和坦桑尼亚,这些情况更为突出,当地医疗系统在应对日益增加的非传染性疾病(NCDs)方面已经面临严峻挑战。对于这些国家的2型糖尿病患者如何管理他们的糖尿病,以及不同的新冠疫情防控措施(肯尼亚实施了封锁和宵禁,而坦桑尼亚采取了不太严格的措施)如何影响他们的糖尿病管理,人们知之甚少。这项定性研究旨在比较两国2型糖尿病患者的叙述,以检查他们在新冠疫情期间面临的疾病管理挑战中的异同。对52名患者进行了半结构化访谈(肯尼亚,n = 22;坦桑尼亚,n = 30),并对访谈记录进行了主题分析。尽管新冠疫情防控措施不同,但两国患者都面临类似的直接健康挑战,如难以获得糖尿病咨询和治疗,但他们也经历了不同的社会结构挑战。直接健康挑战包括难以获得糖尿病咨询和治疗、医疗机构糖尿病药物供应有限以及心理健康困扰。这些挑战因社会结构挑战而加剧,其中许多挑战在新冠疫情之前就已存在,但在疫情期间加剧。这些挑战包括达累斯萨拉姆糖尿病诊所的关闭、商业不稳定、经济困难、健康保险挑战、食品价格上涨影响患者对2型糖尿病饮食建议的依从性(在两国都是如此)以及糖尿病药物和检测试剂盒价格通胀(在肯尼亚)。这些挑战共同导致患者自行用药、漏服剂量,血糖控制不佳。肯尼亚和坦桑尼亚的2型糖尿病患者描述了类似的疾病管理挑战。在这两个国家,未来的应急规划对于确保2型糖尿病的充分常规管理以及改善紧急情况下的医疗服务可及性至关重要。需要负担得起的综合健康保险、经济支持和心理社会服务,以增强患者的复原力,并支持2型糖尿病患者的健康和福祉。