Kobylarz Mateusz D, Klich Sebastian, Sánchez-Jorge Sandra, Buffet-García Jorge, Ortega-Santiago Ricardo, Valera-Calero Juan Antonio
Department of Sport Didactics, Wroclaw University of Health and Sport Sciences, Wrocław, Poland.
Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad Francisco de Vitoria, Madrid, Spain.
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2025 Oct 1;104(10):890-895. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000002721. Epub 2025 Apr 8.
This study aimed to determine latent myofascial trigger points and asymptomatic surrounding areas differences in pain pressure thresholds and shear-wave elastography metrics differences.
Latent myofascial trigger points and asymptomatic control points were identified within the infraspinatus muscle. A blinded examiner assessed the pain pressure thresholds and acquired three shear-wave elastography images of each location. Pain pressure threshold and shear-wave elastography scores were compared by location (myofascial trigger point and control) and gender. Finally, correlations among demographics, pain pressure thresholds, and shear-wave elastography data were calculated.
Forty participants were analyzed. Pain pressure thresholds were significantly lower in latent myofascial trigger points compared with control points in males ( P = 0.003) and females ( P < 0.001), and lower in females compared with males (myofascial trigger point P < 0.001; control point P = 0.006). No significant shear-wave elastography differences were found between myofascial trigger points and control points ( P > 0.05) nor between males and females (myofascial trigger point and control points, P > 0.05). In contrast with the accepted myofascial trigger point definition, those areas with greater pain pressure thresholds exhibited greater stiffness via shear-wave elastography ( P < 0.01).
Although pain pressure threshold scores indicated significant differences in hyperirritability between latent myofascial trigger points and control points, shear-wave elastography measurements revealed no significant differences in muscle stiffness. Furthermore, muscle stiffness was significantly associated with greater pain pressure threshold scores, challenging the hypothesis that stiffer areas can be identified as myofascial trigger points or sources of pain.
本研究旨在确定潜在肌筋膜触发点与无症状周围区域在疼痛压力阈值方面的差异以及剪切波弹性成像指标的差异。
在冈下肌内识别潜在肌筋膜触发点和无症状对照点。一名不知情的检查者评估疼痛压力阈值,并采集每个部位的三张剪切波弹性成像图像。按部位(肌筋膜触发点和对照点)及性别比较疼痛压力阈值和剪切波弹性成像分数。最后,计算人口统计学数据、疼痛压力阈值和剪切波弹性成像数据之间的相关性。
对40名参与者进行了分析。与男性(P = 0.003)和女性(P < 0.001)的对照点相比,潜在肌筋膜触发点的疼痛压力阈值显著更低,且女性的疼痛压力阈值低于男性(肌筋膜触发点P < 0.001;对照点P = 0.006)。在肌筋膜触发点与对照点之间(P > 0.05)以及男性与女性之间(肌筋膜触发点和对照点,P > 0.05)均未发现显著的剪切波弹性成像差异。与公认的肌筋膜触发点定义相反,那些疼痛压力阈值较高的区域通过剪切波弹性成像显示出更大的硬度(P < 0.01)。
尽管疼痛压力阈值分数表明潜在肌筋膜触发点与对照点之间在超敏反应方面存在显著差异,但剪切波弹性成像测量显示肌肉硬度无显著差异。此外,肌肉硬度与更高的疼痛压力阈值分数显著相关,这对更硬的区域可被识别为肌筋膜触发点或疼痛源这一假设提出了挑战。