Lin Zhen-Hong, Pan Cui-Xia, He Jia-Hui, Zhang Xiao-Xian, Lin Sheng-Zhu, Zhang Qing-Ling, Dai Mei, Liang Wei-Quan, Guan Wei-Jie
State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, National Center for Respiratory Medicine, Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, The Second People's Hospital of Foshan, Foshan, China.
Allergy Asthma Immunol Res. 2025 Mar;17(2):196-211. doi: 10.4168/aair.2025.17.2.196.
Asthma-bronchiectasis overlap (ABO) encompasses heterogeneous manifestations, which may predict distinct clinical outcomes. We sought to identify the clinical phenotypes of ABO and compare them to asthma alone or bronchiectasis alone.
In this retrospective cohort study, we extracted electronic medical records from 292 inpatients with ABO, 901 inpatients with asthma alone, and 1,192 inpatients with bronchiectasis alone who were hospitalized between 2015 and 2020. We phenotyped ABO using 2-step unsupervised clustering analysis by using an independent cohort (n = 76).
Compared to asthma or bronchiectasis alone, ABO exhibited greater disease severity and worse clinical outcomes. We identified 3 ABO phenotypes: asthma-dominant ABO (ABO-A, n = 100) with more prominent asthma symptoms; bronchiectasis-dominant ABO (ABO-B, n = 89) with more pronounced features of bronchiectasis; and co-existence of asthma and severe bronchiectasis (ABO-S, n = 103) with worse clinical outcomes. Compared to ABO-B, both ABO-A and ABO-S were associated with significantly higher blood neutrophil ratios (55.8% vs. 59.1% vs. 64.4%, < 0.001), poorer lung function (FEV1% predicted: 79.1% vs. 67.5% vs. 50.1%, < 0.001), longer hospital stay (6.0 vs. 7.0 vs. 7.0 days, = 0.004), and higher risks of hospitalization within the next 2 years (ABO-A: hazards ratio [HR], 3.76, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.12-12.62, = 0.032; ABO-S: HR, 4.05, 95% CI, 1.14-14.36, = 0.031).
The radiologic severity of bronchiectasis and the use of systemic corticosteroids can identify the clinical phenotypes of ABO. The heterogeneity of clinical manifestations may help formulate personalized management strategies and predict the prognosis of ABO.
哮喘-支气管扩张重叠综合征(ABO)表现多样,这可能预示着不同的临床结局。我们试图确定ABO的临床表型,并将其与单纯哮喘或单纯支气管扩张进行比较。
在这项回顾性队列研究中,我们提取了2015年至2020年间住院的292例ABO患者、901例单纯哮喘患者和1192例单纯支气管扩张患者的电子病历。我们通过使用一个独立队列(n = 76)进行两步无监督聚类分析来对ABO进行表型分析。
与单纯哮喘或单纯支气管扩张相比,ABO表现出更严重的疾病程度和更差的临床结局。我们确定了3种ABO表型:以哮喘为主的ABO(ABO-A,n = 100),哮喘症状更突出;以支气管扩张为主的ABO(ABO-B,n = 89),支气管扩张特征更明显;以及哮喘与严重支气管扩张并存(ABO-S,n = 103),临床结局更差。与ABO-B相比,ABO-A和ABO-S的血液中性粒细胞比例均显著更高(55.8%对59.1%对64.4%,<0.001),肺功能更差(预测FEV1%:79.1%对67.5%对50.1%,<0.001),住院时间更长(6.0天对7.0天对7.0天,=0.004),且未来2年内再次住院的风险更高(ABO-A:风险比[HR],3.76,95%置信区间[CI],1.12 - 12.62,=0.032;ABO-S:HR,4.05,95%CI,1.14 - 14.36,=0.031)。
支气管扩张的影像学严重程度和全身糖皮质激素的使用可确定ABO的临床表型。临床表现的异质性可能有助于制定个性化管理策略并预测ABO的预后。