Chivardi Carlos, Zamudio-Sosa Alejandro, Wilson-Barthes Marta, Alarid-Escudero Fernando, Gandhi Monica, Mayer Kenneth H, Operario Don, Galárraga Omar
Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK.
National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM), Mexico City, Mexico.
Pharmacoecon Open. 2025 Apr 9. doi: 10.1007/s41669-025-00569-z.
INTRODUCTION: Conditional economic incentives can improve medication-taking behaviors among populations at risk of contracting human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). However, there are no data on the cost-effectiveness of incentive programs for improving pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) adherence among male sex workers (MSWs) who have one of the highest HIV acquisition rates. Our objective was to assess the cost-effectiveness of incentive programs to improve adherence to pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) among male sex workers METHODS: We conducted an economic evaluation of the PrEP Seguro randomized pilot trial in Mexico (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03674983). Among n = 110 MSWs, those randomized to the intervention received tiered incentives based on PrEP drug levels in scalp hair measured at three clinic visits over 6 months. The intervention led to a 28.7% increase in scalp hair PrEP concentration, consistent with increased adherence (p = 0.05). Here we use a micro-costing approach from the health system perspective to calculate costs. Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were estimated from the number of HIV infections averted through sufficient PrEP adherence (tenofovir concentration > 0.011 ng/mg corresponding to greater than or equal to three weekly doses). Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) estimated the cost/QALY gained owing to the intervention. RESULTS: The mean cost per patient was US $165.53 and $179.55 among standard care and incentive patients, respectively. Over 6 months of follow-up, 62% of standard care patients and 78% of incentive recipients were PrEP adherent. After the program, the lifetime average QALYs gained per infection avoided were 9.17 (minimum, maximum: 7.5, 10.8) and 9.84 (minimum, maximum: 8.05, 11.6) among standard care and incentive patients, respectively. The 6-month ICER was US $20.92/QALY gained by the intervention, which was highly cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay of US $8655 (Mexico's 2020 per capita gross domestic product (GDP)). DISCUSSION: Using behavioral economics approaches for enhancing adherence to HIV prevention may offer health and fiscal benefits through reduced HIV incidence. Fully powered implementation trials can determine future cost-effectiveness of scaling up incentives for PrEP adherence among high-risk populations.
引言:有条件的经济激励措施可以改善有感染人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)风险人群的服药行为。然而,对于提高男男性行为者(MSW)的暴露前预防(PrEP)依从性的激励计划的成本效益,目前尚无相关数据,而男男性行为者是HIV感染率最高的人群之一。我们的目标是评估激励计划对提高男男性行为者暴露前预防(PrEP)依从性的成本效益。方法:我们对墨西哥的PrEP Seguro随机试点试验进行了经济评估(ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT03674983)。在n = 110名男男性行为者中,随机分配到干预组的参与者根据在6个月内三次诊所就诊时测量的头皮毛发中的PrEP药物水平获得分层激励。干预措施使头皮毛发中的PrEP浓度增加了28.7%,这与依从性提高一致(p = 0.05)。在这里,我们从卫生系统的角度采用微观成本核算方法来计算成本。质量调整生命年(QALYs)是根据通过充分的PrEP依从性(替诺福韦浓度>0.011 ng/mg,相当于每周至少服用三次)避免的HIV感染数量来估计的。增量成本效益比(ICERs)估计了由于干预措施而获得的成本/ QALY。 结果:标准护理组和激励组患者的人均成本分别为165.53美元和179.55美元。在6个月的随访中,标准护理组62%的患者和激励组78%的患者坚持服用PrEP。该计划实施后,标准护理组和激励组患者每避免一例感染所获得的终身平均QALYs分别为9.17(最小值,最大值:7.5,10.8)和9.84(最小值,最大值:8.05,11.6)。干预措施获得的6个月ICER为20.92美元/ QALY,在支付意愿为8655美元(墨西哥2020年人均国内生产总值(GDP))的情况下,具有很高的成本效益。 讨论:使用行为经济学方法来提高对HIV预防的依从性,可能通过降低HIV发病率带来健康和财政效益。全面实施的试验可以确定未来扩大对高危人群PrEP依从性激励措施的成本效益。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008-7-16
Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2022-10
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2021-11