Barve Kalyani, Padawe Dimple, Takate Vilas
Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Government Dental College and Hospital, Mumbai, IND.
Cureus. 2025 Mar 9;17(3):e80308. doi: 10.7759/cureus.80308. eCollection 2025 Mar.
Conventional band and loop space maintainers are widely used for space maintenance but have drawbacks, such as soldering failures and multiple appointments. Prefabricated space maintainers address this by requiring less time and only one appointment. However, space maintainers may affect postextraction wound healing and plaque accumulation, leading to gingivitis.
This study compares the effects of prefabricated and conventional band and loop space maintainers on postextraction wound healing, plaque accumulation, and gingival health of the abutment tooth.
The split-mouth study included 10 healthy children aged five to eight years with bilateral mandibular primary first molars indicated for extraction. Each patient's experimental side was randomly selected, dividing quadrants into two groups: conventional and prefabricated band and loop space maintainers. Follow-up appointments were scheduled on the third and seventh day after extraction to assess wound healing using the Landry index, and at first, second, and third months to assess plaque using the Plaque index and gingival health of abutment using the Gingival index. Statistical analysis was performed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences, version 21, for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). Overall intergroup comparison among two groups was done using unpaired t-test.
Both prefabricated and conventional designs increased plaque accumulation and gingivitis. Conventional space maintainers resulted in more plaque accumulation and a higher incidence of gingivitis than the prefabricated ones. However, no statistically significant difference was observed in postextraction wound healing.
Prefabricated band and loop space maintainers offer a practical and efficient solution for space maintenance and represent a promising alternative to conventional designs.
传统带环和丝圈式间隙保持器广泛用于间隙保持,但存在缺点,如焊接失败和需要多次就诊。预制间隙保持器通过减少时间和仅需一次就诊来解决这一问题。然而,间隙保持器可能会影响拔牙后伤口愈合和菌斑堆积,导致牙龈炎。
本研究比较预制和传统带环及丝圈式间隙保持器对拔牙后伤口愈合、菌斑堆积以及基牙牙龈健康的影响。
这项双侧对照研究纳入了10名年龄在5至8岁、双侧下颌乳第一磨牙需拔除的健康儿童。随机选择每位患者的一侧作为实验组,将象限分为两组:传统带环和丝圈式间隙保持器组与预制带环和丝圈式间隙保持器组。拔牙后第3天和第7天安排随访,使用兰德里指数评估伤口愈合情况,在第1、2和3个月评估菌斑堆积情况,使用菌斑指数,评估基牙牙龈健康情况,使用牙龈指数。使用适用于Windows的社会科学统计软件包第21版(SPSS Inc.,芝加哥,伊利诺伊州)进行统计分析。两组间的总体组间比较采用非配对t检验。
预制和传统设计均增加了菌斑堆积和牙龈炎的发生。传统间隙保持器比预制间隙保持器导致更多的菌斑堆积和更高的牙龈炎发生率。然而,拔牙后伤口愈合情况未观察到统计学上的显著差异。
预制带环和丝圈式间隙保持器为间隙保持提供了一种实用且高效的解决方案,是传统设计的一个有前景的替代方案。