• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

由于自由文本编码使用增加,已故捐赠者肾脏乱序分配未被充分识别。

Underrecognition of deceased donor kidney out-of-sequence allocation due to increasing use of free-text coding.

作者信息

Tucker Emma G, Yu Miko E, Adler Joel T, Cron David C, Sahni Prateek V, Schold Jesse D, Mohan Sumit, Husain Syed Ali

机构信息

Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA; Columbia University Renal Epidemiology Group, New York, New York, USA.

Department of Surgery and Perioperative Care, Dell Medical School, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA.

出版信息

Am J Transplant. 2025 Aug;25(8):1715-1722. doi: 10.1016/j.ajt.2025.04.002. Epub 2025 Apr 9.

DOI:10.1016/j.ajt.2025.04.002
PMID:40209903
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12310362/
Abstract

Out-of-sequence (OOS) allocation, the process by which organ procurement organizations (OPOs) can deviate from standard rank lists of potential recipients to expeditiously allocate deceased-donor kidneys, is increasing in the United States. We aimed to determine whether current OPO reporting practices obscure the extent of OOS allocation. Using match-run data for all US deceased-donor kidney transplants from 2021-2023, we defined miscoded OOS (mOOS) allocation transplants as those with use of the 799 or 898 OPO-initiated refusal codes (other, specify) with free-text responses clearly indicating OOS allocation and compared them with explicit OOS allocation, in which OOS transplants are appropriately coded using refusal codes 861 to 863. We found that the prevalence of mOOS allocation increased from 2021 (122 transplants) to 2023 (430 transplants) and accounted for 12% of all OOS transplants by 2023. Organs allocated via mOOS had a lower median kidney donor profile index than those allocated via explicit OOS (51% vs 55%, P < .01). While an increasing number of OPOs used mOOS throughout the study period, the practice remained concentrated overall, with 5 high-frequency OPOs performing 66% of mOOS allocations in 2023. These findings highlight the need for stricter oversight of organ allocation and underscore the responsibility of the Organ Procurement and Transplant Network to ensure proper data reporting.

摘要

非顺序(OOS)分配是指器官获取组织(OPO)可以偏离潜在受者的标准排名列表以迅速分配 deceased 供体肾脏的过程,在美国这种情况正在增加。我们旨在确定当前 OPO 的报告做法是否掩盖了 OOS 分配的程度。利用 2021 年至 2023 年美国所有 deceased 供体肾脏移植的匹配运行数据,我们将错误编码的 OOS(mOOS)分配移植定义为那些使用 799 或 898 OPO 发起的拒绝代码(其他,具体说明)且自由文本回复明确表明 OOS 分配的移植,并将它们与明确的 OOS 分配进行比较,在明确的 OOS 分配中,OOS 移植使用拒绝代码 861 至 863 进行适当编码。我们发现,mOOS 分配的发生率从 2021 年(122 例移植)增加到 2023 年(430 例移植),到 2023 年占所有 OOS 移植的 12%。通过 mOOS 分配的器官的肾脏供体概况指数中位数低于通过明确的 OOS 分配的器官(51%对 55%,P <.01)。虽然在整个研究期间越来越多的 OPO 使用 mOOS,但这种做法总体上仍然集中,2023 年 5 个高频 OPO 进行了 66%的 mOOS 分配。这些发现凸显了对器官分配进行更严格监督的必要性,并强调了器官获取与移植网络确保正确数据报告的责任。

相似文献

1
Underrecognition of deceased donor kidney out-of-sequence allocation due to increasing use of free-text coding.由于自由文本编码使用增加,已故捐赠者肾脏乱序分配未被充分识别。
Am J Transplant. 2025 Aug;25(8):1715-1722. doi: 10.1016/j.ajt.2025.04.002. Epub 2025 Apr 9.
2
Nonstandard coding of deceased-donor kidney out-of-sequence allocation leads to underrecognition of allocation deviations.已故供体肾脏非顺序分配的非标准编码导致分配偏差未得到充分认识。
medRxiv. 2025 Feb 25:2025.02.24.25322786. doi: 10.1101/2025.02.24.25322786.
3
Decreasing efficiency in deceased donor kidney offer notifications under the new distance-based kidney allocation system.在新的基于距离的肾脏分配系统下, deceased donor kidney offer notifications的效率降低。 (注:“deceased donor kidney offer notifications”直译为“死亡供体肾脏供肾通知”,但表述稍显生硬,可根据上下文灵活调整为更通顺的表达,比如“死亡供体肾脏分配通知” 等,这里由于不清楚具体语境,暂保留原文直译。)
Am J Transplant. 2025 Aug;25(8):1696-1706. doi: 10.1016/j.ajt.2025.03.010. Epub 2025 Mar 17.
4
Using Linked Health Service Data in Multimodal Modeling of Kidney Transplant Waitlist Outcomes: Protocol for the Maximizing Organ Donor Utility Systemwide (MODUS) Study.在肾移植等待名单结果的多模态建模中使用关联健康服务数据:全系统最大化器官捐赠者效用系统(MODUS)研究方案。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Jul 29;14:e67588. doi: 10.2196/67588.
5
Association between out-of-sequence allocation and deceased donor kidney nonuse across organ procurement organizations.各器官获取组织中顺序外分配与 deceased 供体肾脏未使用之间的关联。 (注:“deceased donor”直译为“已故捐赠者”,这里结合语境可能指“脑死亡等判定为死亡后的器官捐赠者” ,整体翻译根据医学领域习惯表述进行了优化调整。)
Am J Transplant. 2025 Aug;25(8):1707-1714. doi: 10.1016/j.ajt.2025.02.005. Epub 2025 Feb 17.
6
Out of sequence heart transplants: Why, how many, and to whom.非序贯心脏移植:原因、数量及对象
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2025 Jul 18. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2025.07.006.
7
Normothermic Regional Perfusion Experience of Organ Procurement Organizations in the US.美国器官获取组织的常温区域性灌注经验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Oct 1;7(10):e2440130. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.40130.
8
The experiences of adults who are on dialysis and waiting for a renal transplant from a deceased donor: a systematic review.接受透析治疗并等待已故捐赠者肾脏移植的成年人的经历:一项系统综述。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Mar 12;13(2):169-211. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1973.
9
Optimizing the Use of Deceased Donor Kidneys at Risk of Discard: A Clinical Practice Guideline.优化面临废弃风险的已故捐赠者肾脏的使用:临床实践指南。
Transpl Int. 2025 Jun 26;38:14596. doi: 10.3389/ti.2025.14596. eCollection 2025.
10
Donor Time to Death and Kidney Transplant Outcomes in the Setting of a 3-Hour Minimum Wait Policy.在 3 小时最短等待时间政策的背景下,供者时间到死亡与肾脏移植结局。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Nov 4;7(11):e2443353. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.43353.

本文引用的文献

1
Contemporary prevalence and practice patterns of out-of-sequence kidney allocation.非顺序性肾脏分配的当代患病率及实践模式
Am J Transplant. 2025 Feb;25(2):343-354. doi: 10.1016/j.ajt.2024.08.016. Epub 2024 Aug 23.
2
Incomplete reporting of clinically significant acute rejection episodes in the national kidney transplant registry.国家肾脏移植登记处临床显著急性排斥反应发作报告不完整。
Am J Transplant. 2024 Oct;24(10):1828-1836. doi: 10.1016/j.ajt.2024.04.006. Epub 2024 Apr 16.
3
UNOS Decisions Impact Data Integrity of the OPTN Data Registry.UNOS 决策影响 OPTN 数据注册中心的数据完整性。
Transplantation. 2023 Dec 1;107(12):e348-e354. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000004792. Epub 2023 Sep 20.
4
Augmenting the Unites States transplant registry with external mortality data: A moving target ripe for further improvement.利用外部死亡率数据扩充美国移植登记系统:一个有待进一步改进的不断变化的目标。
Am J Transplant. 2024 Feb;24(2):190-212. doi: 10.1016/j.ajt.2023.09.002. Epub 2023 Sep 12.
5
Discrepant Outcomes between National Kidney Transplant Data Registries in the United States.美国国家肾脏移植数据登记处之间的结果差异。
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2023 Nov 1;34(11):1863-1874. doi: 10.1681/ASN.0000000000000194. Epub 2023 Aug 3.
6
Increased volume of organ offers and decreased efficiency of kidney placement under circle-based kidney allocation.基于环的肾脏分配下,器官供体数量增加,肾脏放置效率降低。
Am J Transplant. 2023 Aug;23(8):1209-1220. doi: 10.1016/j.ajt.2023.05.005. Epub 2023 May 16.
7
Increasing Discards as an Unintended Consequence of Recent Changes in United States Kidney Allocation Policy.美国肾脏分配政策近期变化带来的意外后果:弃用率上升
Kidney Int Rep. 2023 Feb 25;8(5):1109-1111. doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2023.02.1081. eCollection 2023 May.
8
The New Distance-Based Kidney Allocation System: Implications for Patients, Transplant Centers, and Organ Procurement Organizations.新的基于距离的肾脏分配系统:对患者、移植中心和器官获取组织的影响。
Curr Transplant Rep. 2022;9(4):302-307. doi: 10.1007/s40472-022-00384-z. Epub 2022 Oct 13.
9
Single-center analysis of organ offers and workload for liver and kidney allocation.单中心器官捐献和肝、肾分配工作量分析。
Am J Transplant. 2022 Nov;22(11):2661-2667. doi: 10.1111/ajt.17144. Epub 2022 Jul 27.
10
Deceased donor kidneys allocated out of sequence by organ procurement organizations.器官获取组织顺序外分配的已故供体肾脏。
Am J Transplant. 2022 May;22(5):1372-1381. doi: 10.1111/ajt.16951. Epub 2022 Jan 19.