Khouri Maria R, Wang Bofei, Pearson Laurie K, Gillis-Smith Andrew J, Suzuki Sakiko, Hutchinson Lloyd M, Bindal Poorva, Ramanathan Muthalagu, Gerber Jonathan M, Cerny Jan, Patel Shyam A
Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, UMass Memorial Medical Center, UMass Chan Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA.
Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Cancer. 2025 Apr 15;131(8):e35846. doi: 10.1002/cncr.35846.
The prognostic impact of cohesin mutations in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) is controversial.
In patients with AML and MDS who underwent next-generation sequencing at the authors' center during 2017-2023, the authors assessed the landscape of cohesin mutations and the impact of co-occurring mutations on overall survival (OS) and compared outcomes between patients with cohesin mutations and those with wild-type (WT) cohesin genes.
The study included 83 patients, 36 with cohesin mutations (STAG2, n = 28; SMC1A, n = 7; SMC3, n = 3; co-expression of cohesin mutations, n = 2) and 47 with WT cohesin genes. Of the 36 patients with cohesin mutations, 17 (47%) had AML (six de novo and 11 secondary), and 19 (53%) had MDS. Patients who had STAG2 mutations had better median OS than patients who had only SMC1A and SMC3 mutations (26 vs. 10 months; p = .043). SRSF2 mutation was the most frequent co-occurring mutation (n = 12; 33%) and was associated with worse median OS than WT SRSF2 (13 vs. 43 months; p = .016). Seven patients (19%) with cohesin mutations underwent hematopoietic transplantation; their median OS was 70 months. Compared with the WT cohesin group, patients who had cohesin mutations were more likely to have adverse-risk AML (82% vs. 53%). The median OS was similar among patients with adverse-risk AML in the cohesin-mutation and WT cohesin groups (10 vs. 14 months, respectively; p = .9).
The current study provides insight into the prognostic impact of cohesin mutations and co-occurring mutations in patients with myeloid malignancies.
黏连蛋白突变对急性髓系白血病(AML)和骨髓增生异常综合征(MDS)患者预后的影响存在争议。
在2017年至2023年期间于作者所在中心接受二代测序的AML和MDS患者中,作者评估了黏连蛋白突变情况以及共发突变对总生存期(OS)的影响,并比较了黏连蛋白突变患者与野生型(WT)黏连蛋白基因患者的预后。
该研究纳入83例患者,其中36例有黏连蛋白突变(STAG2,n = 28;SMC1A,n = 7;SMC3,n = 3;黏连蛋白突变共表达,n = 2),47例有WT黏连蛋白基因。在36例有黏连蛋白突变的患者中,17例(47%)为AML(6例新发和11例继发),19例(53%)为MDS。有STAG2突变的患者中位OS优于仅有SMC1A和SMC3突变的患者(26个月对10个月;p = 0.043)。SRSF2突变是最常见的共发突变(n = 12;33%),与WT SRSF2相比,其与更差的中位OS相关(13个月对43个月;p = 0.016)。7例(19%)有黏连蛋白突变的患者接受了造血移植;他们的中位OS为70个月。与WT黏连蛋白组相比,有黏连蛋白突变的患者更有可能患有高危AML(82%对53%)。黏连蛋白突变组和WT黏连蛋白组高危AML患者的中位OS相似(分别为10个月和14个月;p = 0.9)。
本研究深入探讨了黏连蛋白突变及共发突变对髓系恶性肿瘤患者预后的影响。