Wu Dennis, Moraglia Luke E, Ravi Shruthi, Elison Jed T, Wolff Jason J, Estes Annette, John Tanya St, Zwaigenbaum Lonnie, Marrus Natasha, Hazlett Heather, Schultz Robert, Botteron Kelly, Dager Stephen R, Abdi Hervé, Piven Joseph, Swanson Meghan R
Department of Psychology, University of Texas at Dallas, USA.
Department of Psychology, University of Texas at Dallas, USA.
Infant Behav Dev. 2025 Apr 11;79:102058. doi: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2025.102058.
Gestures serve as both a communication and a word-learning tool, with typically developing children consistently showing that early gestures are positively associated with later vocabulary skills. However, many autistic children experience delays and challenges in both gesture and vocabulary skills, and studies also show mixed gesture-vocabulary associations; thus, it is unclear whether gestures in autistic children support emerging vocabulary skills. To address previous conflicting findings, the current conceptual replication study uses linear models with a large sample (N = 451) of 12- to 24-month-old English-raised infants to investigate whether gestures are associated with expressive and receptive vocabulary. Using the infant-sibling design, gesture-vocabulary associations and group moderation were investigated in three groups: infant-siblings of autistic children who later meet the criteria for autism themselves (HL-ASD, n = 73), infant-siblings who did not meet criteria for autism (HL-Neg, n = 238), and a control group without a family history of autism (LL-Neg, n = 140). Both LL-Neg and HL-ASD groups showed positive associations between 12-month gestures and 18-month receptive vocabulary; however, only the LL-Neg group showed a positive association between 12-month gestures and 18-month expressive vocabulary. For 12-month gestures and 24-month receptive and expressive vocabulary, the LL-Neg and HL-Neg groups showed positive association, whereas the HL-ASD group did not. Similarly, the LL-Neg and HL-Neg groups showed positive associations between 18-month gestures and 24-month vocabulary, but the HL-ASD did not. Overall, the LL-Neg group showed significant gesture-vocabulary associations across all tested models, while the HL-ASD only showed one significant positive association.
手势既是一种交流工具,也是一种词汇学习工具,正常发育的儿童一贯表明早期手势与后期词汇技能呈正相关。然而,许多自闭症儿童在手势和词汇技能方面都存在延迟和挑战,研究也显示出手势与词汇之间的关联不一;因此,尚不清楚自闭症儿童的手势是否有助于新兴词汇技能的发展。为了解决之前相互矛盾的研究结果,当前的概念性重复研究使用线性模型,对451名12至24个月大、以英语为母语的婴儿进行了大样本研究,以调查手势是否与表达性和接受性词汇相关。采用婴儿兄弟姐妹设计,在三组中研究了手势与词汇的关联以及组间调节作用:后来自己符合自闭症标准的自闭症儿童的婴儿兄弟姐妹(高风险自闭症组,n = 73)、不符合自闭症标准的婴儿兄弟姐妹(低风险非自闭症组,n = 238),以及无自闭症家族史的对照组(低风险非自闭症组,n = 140)。低风险非自闭症组和高风险自闭症组在12个月大时的手势与18个月大时的接受性词汇之间均呈现正相关;然而,只有低风险非自闭症组在12个月大时的手势与18个月大时的表达性词汇之间呈现正相关。对于12个月大时的手势与24个月大时的接受性和表达性词汇,低风险非自闭症组和低风险非自闭症组呈现正相关,而高风险自闭症组则没有。同样,低风险非自闭症组和低风险非自闭症组在18个月大时的手势与24个月大时的词汇之间呈现正相关,但高风险自闭症组没有。总体而言,低风险非自闭症组在所有测试模型中均显示出显著的手势与词汇关联,而高风险自闭症组仅显示出一种显著的正相关。