Sertoz Nezih, Cagiran Zeynep, Ozgul Kazım Koray, Turhan Asli B, Karaman Semra
Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Ege University, Izmir, Turkey.
Department of Anesthesia, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City USA.
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2025 Mar 24;65:102980. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2025.102980. eCollection 2025 Jun.
Peripheral nerve damage is the most common and most frightening complication after a peripheral nerve block procedure. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of different tourniquet durations on the sensory, motor, and sympathetic functions of peripheral nerves in patients undergoing upper extremity surgery by measuring nerve diameters under ultrasound guidance and performing nerve conduction studies to evaluate the effects on nerve damage in distal forearm.
This study was conducted on ASA I-III patients between the ages of18 and70 who were scheduled to undergo surgery on the mid and distal forearm. All patients underwent brachial plexus block via an axillary approach using USG and a nerve stimulator Prior to the application of the block, the diameters of the median, radial, ulnar, and musculocutaneous nerves were measured under USG guidance.The same assistant personnel injected 7 ml of bupivacaine and lidocaine mixture into each nerve (median, radial, ulnar). Local anesthetic(LA) to spread along the nerve sheath, the diameters of each nerve sheath were measured and recorded again by USG. Nerve conduction studies using EMG were performed by the same researcher before surgery and 1month after surgery to evaluate for nerve damage.
The study consisted of 61 patients. Of the patients, 42.6 % were aged 40-60 years, and 54.1 % were women. One patient was switched to general anesthesia due to block failure, and the patient was excluded from the study. Three patients experienced complications (prolonged sensory block of 15 h in two patients, and sensory paralysis of one month in one patient. The tourniquet times of the patients were almost equal.There was a statistically significant difference between the first and final measurements of patients' Median Nerve Diameter, Radial Nerve Diameter, Ulnar Nerve Diameter, Median Nerve Sensory Amplitude, Ulnar Nerve Sensory Amplitude, Radial Nerve Sensory Amplitude, Ulnar Nerve Motor Amplitude, Median Sensory Latency, Ulnar Sensory Latency, and Radial Sensory Latency(p < 0.05).). In both patients with and without DM, the difference between the first and last measurements of Median Nerve Diameter, Radial Nerve Diameter, Ulnar Nerve Diameter, Median Sensory Latency, and Radial Sensory Latency was statistically significant (p < 0, 05).
Involuntary intraneural injections can occur with peripheral nerve blocks. When the effect of the increase in nerve diameter due to local anesthesia and appropriate tourniquet duration on nerve damage is evaluated by nerve conduction studies, although it causes partial impairment of nerve function (slowing of nerve conduction, decrease in amplitude), it generally does not cause permanent nerve damage.
周围神经损伤是周围神经阻滞操作后最常见且最令人担忧的并发症。本研究的目的是通过在超声引导下测量神经直径并进行神经传导研究,以评估不同止血带持续时间对接受上肢手术患者周围神经感觉、运动和交感神经功能的影响,从而评估对前臂远端神经损伤的影响。
本研究针对年龄在18至70岁之间、计划进行前臂中远端手术的美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)I - III级患者开展。所有患者均通过腋窝入路,使用超声引导(USG)和神经刺激器进行臂丛神经阻滞。在进行阻滞前,在超声引导下测量正中神经、桡神经、尺神经和肌皮神经的直径。由同一名辅助人员向每条神经(正中神经、桡神经、尺神经)注射7毫升布比卡因和利多卡因混合液。局部麻醉药(LA)沿神经鞘扩散后,再次通过超声引导测量并记录每条神经鞘直径。由同一名研究人员在手术前和手术后1个月使用肌电图进行神经传导研究,以评估神经损伤情况。
该研究共纳入61例患者。其中,42.6%的患者年龄在40 - 60岁之间,54.1%为女性。1例患者因阻滞失败转为全身麻醉,该患者被排除在研究之外。3例患者出现并发症(2例患者感觉阻滞延长15小时,1例患者感觉麻痹1个月。患者的止血带使用时间几乎相同。患者正中神经直径、桡神经直径、尺神经直径、正中神经感觉振幅、尺神经感觉振幅、桡神经感觉振幅、尺神经运动振幅、正中感觉潜伏期、尺感觉潜伏期和桡感觉潜伏期的首次测量值与最终测量值之间存在统计学显著差异(p < 0.05)。)。在患有和未患有糖尿病的患者中,正中神经直径、桡神经直径、尺神经直径、正中感觉潜伏期和桡感觉潜伏期的首次测量值与最后测量值之间的差异均具有统计学意义(p < 0.05)。
周围神经阻滞可能会发生非故意的神经内注射。当通过神经传导研究评估局部麻醉和适当的止血带持续时间导致的神经直径增加对神经损伤的影响时,尽管其会导致神经功能部分受损(神经传导减慢、振幅降低),但一般不会造成永久性神经损伤。