Suppr超能文献

临床护理实践中经济评估的系统评价

A Systematic Review of Economic Evaluations in Clinical Nursing Practices.

作者信息

Guan Yushan, Ru Nan, Kang Ruifu, Jia Xiangping, Xu Tingting, Meng Zhaolin

机构信息

School of Nursing Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

Department of Health Policy and Management Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

出版信息

J Nurs Manag. 2024 Aug 9;2024:9939254. doi: 10.1155/2024/9939254. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The misallocation of scarce healthcare resources globally raises concerns regarding the underuse of high-value care and the overuse of low-value care. Economic evaluations can help policy makers determine whether an intervention presents a better value for money and desirable clinical benefits, thus realizing value-based care.

AIM

We aimed to conduct a systematic review of the economic evaluations of clinical nursing practices to advance knowledge on value-based care.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted using MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, CINAHL, NHS Economic Evaluation Database, Health Technology Assessment, and Tufts CEA Registry for full economic evaluations of clinical nursing practices from January 2013 to January 2023. Outcomes were incremental cost-effectiveness ratios, incremental cost-utility ratios, incremental cost-benefit ratios, incremental net benefit, and the differences in costs for cost-minimization studies. Methodological quality was evaluated using the Consensus Health Economic Criteria-extended checklist. Results were synthesized using permutation matrices for all studies. The protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023415918).

RESULTS

Thirty-five studies were included in this review, with 27 studies categorized as good methodological quality and 8 as moderate quality. Clinical nursing practices were dominant (i.e., more effective and less costly) in 19 studies, potentially cost-effective depending on willingness-to-pay thresholds in 15 studies, and were dominated (i.e., less effective and more costly) in 1 study.

CONCLUSION

Our study advanced knowledge on value-based care for clinical nursing practices. Results suggest that most clinical nursing practices studied may be clearly economically favourable or potentially favourable. . The results of this review provide valuable insights into value-based care in nursing and facilitate the decision-making of healthcare policymakers regarding health resource allocation to achieve value-based care.

摘要

背景

全球稀缺医疗资源的分配不当引发了人们对高价值医疗服务利用不足和低价值医疗服务过度使用的担忧。经济评估可以帮助政策制定者确定一项干预措施是否具有更好的性价比以及理想的临床效益,从而实现基于价值的医疗。

目的

我们旨在对临床护理实践的经济评估进行系统综述,以推进基于价值医疗方面的知识。

方法

使用MEDLINE、Embase、科学网、Cochrane对照试验中心注册库、护理学与健康领域数据库、英国国家医疗服务体系经济评估数据库、卫生技术评估以及塔夫茨成本效果分析注册库,对2013年1月至2023年1月期间临床护理实践的全面经济评估进行系统综述。结果指标为增量成本效果比、增量成本效用比、增量成本效益比、增量净效益以及成本最小化研究中的成本差异。使用共识健康经济标准扩展清单对方法学质量进行评估。对所有研究的结果使用排列矩阵进行综合分析。该方案已在国际系统评价注册库(PROSPERO)注册(注册号:CRD42023415918)。

结果

本综述纳入了35项研究,其中27项研究的方法学质量被归类为良好,8项为中等质量。19项研究中临床护理实践占主导地位(即更有效且成本更低),15项研究中根据支付意愿阈值可能具有成本效益,1项研究中临床护理实践处于劣势(即效果较差且成本更高)。

结论

我们的研究推进了临床护理实践基于价值医疗方面的知识。结果表明,大多数所研究的临床护理实践在经济上可能明显有利或潜在有利。本综述结果为护理领域基于价值的医疗提供了有价值的见解,并有助于医疗政策制定者在卫生资源分配方面做出决策,以实现基于价值的医疗。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8263/11918575/6c2583c9a7a2/JONM2024-9939254.001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验