Dariya S S, Maheshwari Anuj, Viswanathan Vijay, Virmani Anil Kumar, Aslam Mohsin, Modi Alok, Tewari Ajoy Kumar, Chaturvedi Ashutosh, Kedia Arun Kumar, Ramchandani G D, Saxena Rajnish, Panda Jayant K, Saxena Ashish, Singh Akash N, Patni Bijay, Dengra Ashish S, Hasnani Dhruvi, Chavda Vipul, Natarajan Kannan, Varma Anubha, Jagadeesha Aravinda, Agarwal Dinesh, Singh Nagendra Kumar, Sreenivasamurthy L, Saboo Bharat, Samaria Anil, Suri Sandeep, Ansari Sajid
Internal Medicine, National Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Jaipur, IND.
Internal Medicine, Hind Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, IND.
Cureus. 2025 Mar 13;17(3):e80512. doi: 10.7759/cureus.80512. eCollection 2025 Mar.
Background The burden of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) is compounded by serious complications, including cardiovascular and microvascular diseases, with significant healthcare costs associated with these complications. Engaging in self-care practices can enhance glycemic control and empower individuals to make informed health decisions. The present study aims to assess the existing levels of awareness and understanding of diabetes, focusing on the perception of its risk factors and associated complications. Methodology This prospective, cross-sectional study involved 2,468 individuals with T2DM recruited from 26 sites across India. Data underwent aggregate-level analysis using Python and were assessed for statistical significance using the chi-square test. Continuous variables (means and standard deviations) were analyzed, and differences among groups were evaluated using analysis of variance. To assess the understanding of diabetes, including its symptoms and complications, all knowledge-related questions were aggregated into a composite score. Participants were categorized into three groups (high, medium, and low) based on their knowledge levels. The participant's variables across five dimensions, namely, diabetes causes and symptoms, medication usage, diet and lifestyle, hypoglycemia, and complications from diabetes, were assessed. The highest achievable score was 26, while the lowest was 0. Based on the knowledge score, individuals were classified into the following three groups: high for participants who scored 80% or more correct answers (score >20); medium for those scoring between 40% and 80% (score between 11 and 20); and low for participants with a score between 0 and 10, indicating fewer than 40% correct responses. Results The average participant age was 54.1 years, with a male-to-female ratio of 60:40. The average hemoglobin A1c level was 8.2%, with 629 (28%) maintaining levels within the target range (≤7%), and 497 (22%) having levels above 9%. Overall, 655 (26.50%) individuals were classified as high knowledge, 1,179 (47.77%) as medium knowledge, and 634 (25.68%) as low knowledge. Scores were 22.4 (1.2) for high knowledge, 15.9 (2.9) for medium, and 6.2 (3.0) for low. Diabetic complications were significantly higher in the high-knowledge group. Adherence to diabetes medication was higher in the high (509 (78.5%)) and medium (917 (81.6%)) knowledge groups (p < 0.001) compared to the low (363 (60.3%)) knowledge group. Participants with high and medium knowledge levels demonstrated significantly greater ownership and use of glucometers compared to those with lower knowledge levels. Conclusions Individuals with T2DM who experience complications tend to have a greater understanding of diabetes and its risk factors than those without complications. This suggests that facing health issues motivates individuals to seek information, improving their knowledge and influencing better medication adherence and lifestyle choices. The findings of this study, coupled with existing data, underscore the urgent need for innovative approaches to engage and motivate individuals through targeted educational initiatives, comprehensive counseling, regular monitoring, and strategies to improve adherence to recommended diabetes management practices.
2型糖尿病(T2D)的负担因严重并发症而加重,这些并发症包括心血管疾病和微血管疾病,且与这些并发症相关的医疗费用高昂。进行自我护理可以加强血糖控制,并使个人能够做出明智的健康决策。本研究旨在评估对糖尿病的现有认知水平和理解程度,重点关注对其危险因素和相关并发症的认知。
这项前瞻性横断面研究纳入了从印度26个地点招募的2468名T2DM患者。使用Python对数据进行汇总分析,并通过卡方检验评估统计学意义。分析连续变量(均值和标准差),并使用方差分析评估组间差异。为评估对糖尿病的理解,包括其症状和并发症,将所有与知识相关的问题汇总为一个综合得分。根据参与者的知识水平将其分为三组(高、中、低)。评估参与者在五个维度上的变量,即糖尿病病因和症状、药物使用、饮食和生活方式、低血糖以及糖尿病并发症。最高可得分为26分,最低为0分。根据知识得分,个体被分为以下三组:得分80%或更高(得分>20)的参与者为高知识组;得分在40%至80%之间(得分在11至20之间)的为中等知识组;得分在0至10分之间(表明正确回答少于40%)的参与者为低知识组。
参与者的平均年龄为54.1岁,男女比例为60:40。平均糖化血红蛋白水平为8.2%,其中629人(28%)将水平维持在目标范围内(≤7%),497人(22%)的水平高于9%。总体而言,655人(26.50%)被归类为高知识组,1179人(47.77%)为中等知识组,634人(25.68%)为低知识组。高知识组的得分是22.4(1.2),中等知识组是15.9(2.9),低知识组是6.2(3.0)。高知识组的糖尿病并发症明显更多。与低知识组(363人(60.3%))相比,高知识组(509人(78.5%))和中等知识组(917人(81.6%))的糖尿病药物依从性更高(p<0.001)。与知识水平较低的参与者相比, 高知识和中等知识水平的参与者对血糖仪的拥有和使用明显更多。
与无并发症的T2DM患者相比,有并发症的患者往往对糖尿病及其危险因素有更深入的了解。这表明面对健康问题会促使个体寻求信息,提高他们的知识水平,并影响更好的药物依从性和生活方式选择。本研究结果与现有数据共同强调,迫切需要创新方法,通过有针对性的教育举措、全面的咨询、定期监测以及提高对推荐的糖尿病管理实践的依从性的策略,来吸引和激励个体。