Linton Linda, Culpan Jane, Lane Judith
Dietetics, Nutrition & Biological Sciences, Physiotherapy, Podiatry & Radiography Division, School of Health Sciences, Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh, UK.
Edinburgh Sports Medicine Research Network, Institute for Sport, PE and Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Transl Sports Med. 2025 Feb 25;2025:3007544. doi: 10.1155/tsm2/3007544. eCollection 2025.
Runners have not benefited from the same reduction in injury rates seen in injury prevention studies conducted in other sports. The purpose of this scoping review was to identify and map injury risk reduction practices for running-related injury (RRI), methods of delivery and understand the views of experts and runner's preferences in reducing RRI. Scoping review. We conducted systematic database searches of MEDLINE, CINAHL and SPORTDiscus from 2000 to April 2024. Eligible studies included injury prevention strategies for RRI. Data synthesis was conducted according to PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews using Joanna Briggs Institute framework methodology. Extracted data were mapped and coded from intervention studies, expert opinions and reviews, and inductive thematic analysis created subthemes and themes from prospective cohorts, qualitative studies and surveys. A total of 3777 studies were identified, and 106 studies met the inclusion criteria. In intervention studies, supervision and support appeared critical for better effect. Key injury prevention topics were strengthening, gait re-education and wearables, graduated running programmes, footwear, recovery and educational advice. A multifactorial approach considering individual risk profiles was recommended by experts, but there was a disparity in what runners do to reduce injury risk compared to expert advice, with actions appearing to be related to self-efficacy rather than avoidance. This scoping review highlighted runners require individualized, supported and multifactorial approaches for injury risk reduction, and runners seek knowledge on purpose. We found runners injury risk reduction practices should begin early with youth runners and facilitating this through coaching supervision is likely to support behaviour change. Strategies such as gait retraining, wearables and recovery need further exploration but provide promising strategies runners may engage with more. As runners are likely to choose familiar options minimally impacting lifestyle and running, they should be provided with education but need support with their choices to influence beliefs.
在其他运动项目所开展的预防损伤研究中,损伤率有所降低,而跑步者却未能从中受益。本综述的目的是识别并梳理与跑步相关损伤(RRI)的损伤风险降低措施、实施方法,并了解专家观点以及跑步者在降低RRI方面的偏好。综述研究。我们对2000年至2024年4月期间的MEDLINE、CINAHL和SPORTDiscus数据库进行了系统检索。符合条件的研究包括RRI的预防策略。数据综合是根据《系统综述与Meta分析扩展版》(PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews),采用乔安娜·布里格斯研究所(Joanna Briggs Institute)的框架方法进行的。从干预性研究、专家意见及综述中提取的数据进行了映射和编码,并通过归纳主题分析从前瞻性队列研究、定性研究和调查中创建了子主题和主题。共识别出3777项研究,其中106项研究符合纳入标准。在干预性研究中,监督和支持对于取得更好的效果似乎至关重要。关键的预防损伤主题包括强化训练、步态再教育与可穿戴设备、循序渐进的跑步计划、鞋类、恢复以及教育建议。专家建议采用考虑个体风险状况的多因素方法,但与专家建议相比,跑步者在降低损伤风险的做法上存在差异,其行为似乎与自我效能感有关,而非避免损伤。本综述强调,跑步者需要个性化、有支持的多因素方法来降低损伤风险,且跑步者有目的地寻求知识。我们发现,降低跑步者损伤风险的措施应从青少年跑步者早期开始,通过教练监督来促进这一点可能有助于行为改变。诸如步态再训练、可穿戴设备和恢复等策略需要进一步探索,但为跑步者提供了他们可能更愿意采用的有前景的策略。由于跑步者可能会选择对生活方式和跑步影响最小的熟悉选项,因此应为他们提供教育,但他们在做出选择时需要支持,以影响其观念。