• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器人辅助肝切除术的成本效益和临床影响。

Cost-effectiveness and clinical impact of robotic-assisted hepatectomy.

作者信息

Rouault A, Pecquenard F, Elamrani M, Boleslawski E, Truant S, Millet G

机构信息

Lille University Hospital, Lille, France.

出版信息

J Robot Surg. 2025 Apr 14;19(1):156. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02319-z.

DOI:10.1007/s11701-025-02319-z
PMID:40229619
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11997018/
Abstract

Robotic-assisted hepatectomy has gained traction in hepatobiliary surgery, but its cost-effectiveness compared to traditional surgical approaches remains unclear. This study investigates clinical outcomes and financial implications of robotic-assisted liver surgery in a high-volume center, comparing it with open and laparoscopic methods. A retrospective cohort study was conducted on patients undergoing hepatectomy at Lille University Hospital in 2018 and 2021, performed by the institution's first experienced robotic hepatobiliary surgeon. Data on patient demographics, intraoperative details, postoperative outcomes, and costs were analyzed. Costs included hospital stays, surgical materials, and complications, derived from national cost studies. A total of 111 patients were included, with a rise in minimally invasive procedures from 47.5% in 2018 to 75% in 2021. Robotic-assisted hepatectomy was associated with reduced hospital stays, lower complication rates, and fewer severe morbidities compared to laparotomy. The average cost per procedure (all surgical approaches combined) decreased from €12,169 in 2018 to €8,513 in 2021, with robotic surgery offering a significant financial advantage. The total savings for the 71 patients in the 2021 cohort was €259,576, driven primarily by reduced hospitalization times and fewer complications. Robotic-assisted hepatectomy is clinically safe and cost-effective, offering substantial financial savings over traditional surgery. The reduction in postoperative complications and hospital stay durations, particularly for complex cases, highlights the advantages of robotic surgery in hepatobiliary procedures. As surgical expertise increases, robotic surgery represents a sustainable and efficient alternative in liver resection.

摘要

机器人辅助肝切除术在肝胆外科手术中越来越受到关注,但其与传统手术方法相比的成本效益仍不明确。本研究调查了在一个高容量中心进行机器人辅助肝脏手术的临床结果和财务影响,并将其与开放手术和腹腔镜手术方法进行比较。对2018年和2021年在里尔大学医院接受肝切除术的患者进行了一项回顾性队列研究,手术由该机构第一位经验丰富的机器人肝胆外科医生进行。分析了患者人口统计学、术中细节、术后结果和成本的数据。成本包括住院时间、手术材料和并发症,这些数据来自国家成本研究。总共纳入了111名患者,微创程序的比例从2018年的47.5%上升到2021年的75%。与开腹手术相比,机器人辅助肝切除术与缩短住院时间、降低并发症发生率和减少严重发病率相关。每个手术程序的平均成本(所有手术方法合计)从2018年的12,169欧元降至2021年的8,513欧元,机器人手术具有显著的财务优势。2021年队列中的71名患者总共节省了259,576欧元,主要是由于住院时间缩短和并发症减少。机器人辅助肝切除术在临床上是安全且具有成本效益的,与传统手术相比可节省大量资金。术后并发症和住院时间的减少,特别是对于复杂病例,凸显了机器人手术在肝胆手术中的优势。随着手术专业知识的增加,机器人手术是肝切除术中一种可持续且高效的替代方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7cac/11997018/a9d79ce40a88/11701_2025_2319_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7cac/11997018/771d617f78f2/11701_2025_2319_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7cac/11997018/a9d79ce40a88/11701_2025_2319_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7cac/11997018/771d617f78f2/11701_2025_2319_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7cac/11997018/a9d79ce40a88/11701_2025_2319_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Cost-effectiveness and clinical impact of robotic-assisted hepatectomy.机器人辅助肝切除术的成本效益和临床影响。
J Robot Surg. 2025 Apr 14;19(1):156. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02319-z.
2
One hundred and fifty-two robotic hepatectomies at a North American hepatobiliary program: Evolution of practice, learning curve, appraisal of outcomes, and cost analysis.北美一家肝胆中心的152例机器人肝切除术:实践的演变、学习曲线、结果评估及成本分析
Surg Endosc. 2025 Mar;39(3):2136-2146. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11570-2. Epub 2025 Feb 18.
3
Comparative cost-effectiveness of open, laparoscopic, and robotic liver resection: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.开放性、腹腔镜和机器人肝切除术的成本效果比较:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Surgery. 2024 Jul;176(1):11-23. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2024.04.015. Epub 2024 May 22.
4
Financial Impact of the Robotic Approach in Liver Surgery: A Comparative Study of Clinical Outcomes and Costs Between the Robotic and Open Technique in a Single Institution.机器人辅助肝脏手术的财务影响:单机构中机器人技术与开放技术的临床结果和成本对比研究
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2017 Apr;27(4):375-382. doi: 10.1089/lap.2016.0576. Epub 2017 Feb 10.
5
A propensity score matched cost analysis of robotic versus open hepatectomy.机器人辅助肝切除术与开腹肝切除术的倾向评分匹配成本分析。
HPB (Oxford). 2024 Nov;26(11):1379-1386. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2024.08.001. Epub 2024 Aug 8.
6
Robotic versus laparoscopic liver resection in complex cases of left lateral sectionectomy.机器人与腹腔镜左外叶切除术治疗复杂病例。
Int J Surg. 2019 Jul;67:54-60. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.05.008. Epub 2019 May 20.
7
Minimally invasive liver resection in the era of robotics: analysis of 214 cases.机器人辅助微创肝切除术 214 例分析。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Jan;34(1):339-348. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06773-3. Epub 2019 Apr 1.
8
Effect of IWATE laparoscopic difficulty score on postoperative outcomes and costs for robotic hepatectomy: Are complex resections more expensive?岩手腹腔镜困难评分对机器人肝切除术术后结局和成本的影响:复杂切除术更昂贵吗?
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2024 Jul;31(7):446-454. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.12003. Epub 2024 May 27.
9
Comparative clinical outcomes of robot-assisted liver resection versus laparoscopic liver resection: A meta-analysis.机器人辅助肝切除术与腹腔镜肝切除术的临床疗效比较:荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 13;15(10):e0240593. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240593. eCollection 2020.
10
Efficacy and cost of robotic hepatectomy: is the robot cost-prohibitive?机器人肝切除术的疗效与成本:机器人是否成本过高?
J Robot Surg. 2016 Dec;10(4):307-313. doi: 10.1007/s11701-016-0598-4. Epub 2016 May 6.

本文引用的文献

1
Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Liver Resection: A Nationwide Propensity Score Matched Analysis.机器人辅助与腹腔镜肝切除术:一项全国性倾向评分匹配分析
Ann Surg Open. 2024 Nov 26;5(4):e527. doi: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000527. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
Impact of robotic-assisted surgery on length of hospital stay in Paris public hospitals: a retrospective analysis.机器人辅助手术对巴黎公立医院住院时间的影响:一项回顾性分析。
J Robot Surg. 2024 Sep 4;18(1):332. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-02031-4.
3
Towards a Standardization of Learning Curve Assessment in Minimally Invasive Liver Surgery.
迈向微创肝脏手术学习曲线评估的标准化
Ann Surg. 2024 Jun 26;281(2):252-64. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006417.
4
Evolution of minimally invasive liver surgery in France over the last decade.过去十年法国微创肝外科的发展。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Aug;38(8):4457-4467. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10951-3. Epub 2024 Jun 20.
5
Validation of the IWATE Criteria in Robotic-Assisted Liver Resections.岩手标准在机器人辅助肝切除术中的验证
J Clin Med. 2024 May 3;13(9):2697. doi: 10.3390/jcm13092697.
6
Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Liver Resection in Various Settings: An International Multicenter Propensity Score Matched Study of 10.075 Patients.机器人与腹腔镜肝切除术在各种情况下的比较:一项 10075 例患者的国际多中心倾向评分匹配研究。
Ann Surg. 2024 Jul 1;280(1):108-117. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006267. Epub 2024 Mar 14.
7
What Is the Role of Minimally Invasive Liver Surgery in Treating Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma on Cirrhosis?微创肝脏手术在治疗肝硬化合并肝细胞癌患者中起什么作用?
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Feb 28;16(5):966. doi: 10.3390/cancers16050966.
8
International experts consensus guidelines on robotic liver resection in 2023.2023 年国际专家机器人肝切除术共识指南。
World J Gastroenterol. 2023 Aug 28;29(32):4815-4830. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v29.i32.4815.
9
Propensity Score-Matching Analysis Comparing Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Limited Liver Resections of the Posterosuperior Segments: An International Multicenter Study.倾向评分匹配分析比较后上段有限肝切除术的机器人手术与腹腔镜手术:一项国际多中心研究。
Ann Surg. 2024 Feb 1;279(2):297-305. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006027. Epub 2023 Jul 24.
10
Robot-assisted Radical Cystectomy Versus Open Radical Cystectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Perioperative, Oncological, and Quality of Life Outcomes Using Randomized Controlled Trials.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术与开放性根治性膀胱切除术的比较:使用随机对照试验的围手术期、肿瘤学和生活质量结局的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Urol. 2023 Oct;84(4):393-405. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.04.004. Epub 2023 May 9.