Suppr超能文献

优化英格兰妊娠27至31周极早产新生儿服务:OPTI-PREM混合方法研究

Optimising neonatal services for very preterm births between 27 and 31 weeks gestation in England: the OPTI-PREM mixed-methods study.

作者信息

Pillay Thillagavathie, Rivero-Arias Oliver, Armstrong Natalie, Seaton Sarah E, Yang Miaoqing, Banda Victor L, Dawson Kelvin, Ismail Abdul Qt, Bountziouka Vasiliki, Cupit Caroline, Paton Alexis, Manktelow Bradley N, Draper Elizabeth S, Modi Neena, Campbell Helen E, Boyle Elaine M

机构信息

Faculty of Science and Engineering, University of Wolverhampton, Wolverhampton, UK.

Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.

出版信息

Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Apr;13(12):1-126. doi: 10.3310/JYWC6538.

Abstract

AIM

To investigate, for preterm babies born between 27 and 31 weeks gestation in England, optimal place of birth and early care.

DESIGN

Mixed methods.

SETTING

National Health Service neonatal care, England.

METHODS

To investigate whether birth and early care in neonatal intensive care units (tertiary units) compared to local neonatal units (non-tertiary units) influenced gestation-specific survival and other major outcomes, we analysed data from the National Neonatal Research Database, for 29,842 babies born between 27 and 31 weeks gestation and discharged from neonatal care between 1 January 2014 and 31 December 2018. We utilised an instrumental variable (maternal excess travel time between local neonatal units and neonatal intensive care units) to control for unmeasured differences. Sensitivity analyses excluded postnatal transfers within 72 hours of birth and multiple births. Outcome measures were death in neonatal care, infant mortality, necrotising enterocolitis, retinopathy of prematurity, severe brain injury, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, and receipt of breast milk at discharge. We also analysed outcomes by volume of neonatal intensive care activity. We undertook a health economic analysis using a cost-effectiveness evaluation from a National Health Service perspective and using additional lives saved as a measure of benefit, explored differences in quality of care in high compared with low-performing units and performed ethnographic qualitative research.

RESULTS

The safe gestational age cut-off for babies to be born between 27 and 31 weeks and early care at either location was 28 weeks. We found no effect on mortality in neonatal care (mean difference -0.001; 99% confidence interval -0.011 to 0.010;  = 0.842) or in infancy (mean difference -0.002; 99% confidence interval -0.014 to 0.009;  = 0.579) ( = 18,847), including after sensitivity analyses. A significantly greater proportion of babies in local neonatal units had severe brain injury (mean difference -0.011; 99% confidence interval -0.022 to -0.001;  = 0.007) with the highest mean difference in babies born at 27 weeks (-0.040). Those transferred in the first 72 hours were more likely to have severe brain injury. For 27 weeks gestation, birth in centres with neonatal intensive care units reduced the risk of severe brain injury by 4.2% from 11.9% to 7.7%. The number needed to treat was 25 (99% confidence interval 10 to 59) indicating that 25 babies at 27 weeks would have to be delivered in a neonatal intensive care unit to prevent one severe brain injury. For babies born at 27 weeks gestation, birth in a high-volume unit (> 1600 intensive care days/year) reduced the risk of severe brain injury from 0.242 to 0.028 [99% confidence interval 0.035 to 0.542;  = 0.003; number needed to treat = 4 (99% confidence interval 2 to 29)]. Estimated annual total costs of neonatal care were £262 million. The mean (standard deviation) cost per baby varied from £75,594 (£34,874) at 27 weeks to £27,401 (£14,947) at 31 weeks. Costs were similar between neonatal intensive care units and local neonatal units for births at 27 to 29 weeks gestation, but higher for local neonatal units for those born at 30 to 31 weeks. No difference in additional lives saved were observed between the settings. These results suggested that neonatal intensive care units are likely to represent value for money for the National Health Service. However, careful interpretation of this results should be exercised due to the ethical and practical concerns around the reorganisation of neonatal care for very preterm babies from local neonatal units to neonatal intensive care units purely on the grounds of cost savings. We identified a mean reduction in length of stay (1 day; 95% confidence interval 1.029 to 1.081;  < 0.001) in higher-performing units, based on adherence to evidence- and consensus-based measures. Staff reported that decision-making to optimise capacity for babies was an important part of their work. Parents reported valuing their baby's development, homecoming, continuity of care, inclusion in decision-making, and support for their emotional and physical well-being.

CONCLUSIONS

Birth and early care for babies ≥ 28 weeks is safe in both neonatal intensive care units and local neonatal units in England. For anticipated births at 27 weeks, antenatal transfer of mothers to centres colocated with neonatal intensive care units should be supported. When these inadvertently occur in centres with local neonatal units, clinicians should risk assess decisions for postnatal transfer, taking patient care requirements, staff skills and healthcare resources into consideration and counselling parents regarding the increased risk of severe brain injury associated with transfer.

STUDY REGISTRATION

This study is registered as Current Controlled Trials NCT02994849 and ISRCTN74230187.

FUNDING

This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health and Social Care Delivery Research programme (NIHR award ref: 15/70/104) and is published in full in ; Vol. 13, No. 12. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.

摘要

目的

调查在英格兰妊娠27至31周出生的早产儿的最佳出生地点和早期护理情况。

设计

混合方法。

背景

英格兰国民医疗服务体系的新生儿护理。

方法

为了研究与当地新生儿病房(非三级病房)相比,新生儿重症监护病房(三级病房)的出生和早期护理是否会影响特定孕周的存活率和其他主要结局,我们分析了国家新生儿研究数据库中2014年1月1日至2018年12月31日期间出生并从新生儿护理中出院的29842例妊娠27至31周婴儿的数据。我们使用工具变量(产妇在当地新生儿病房和新生儿重症监护病房之间的额外出行时间)来控制未测量的差异。敏感性分析排除了出生后72小时内的产后转运和多胞胎。结局指标包括新生儿护理期间的死亡、婴儿死亡率、坏死性小肠结肠炎、早产儿视网膜病变、严重脑损伤、支气管肺发育不良以及出院时接受母乳情况。我们还按新生儿重症监护活动量分析了结局。我们从国民医疗服务体系的角度进行了成本效益评估的卫生经济分析,并将挽救的额外生命作为效益衡量指标,探讨了高绩效单位与低绩效单位在护理质量上的差异,并进行了人种志定性研究。

结果

妊娠27至31周出生的婴儿在两个地点进行早期护理的安全孕周临界值为28周。我们发现,无论是在新生儿护理期间(平均差异-0.001;99%置信区间-0.011至0.010;P = 0.842)还是在婴儿期(平均差异-0.002;99%置信区间-0.014至0.009;P = 0.579)(P = 18847),包括敏感性分析后,均未发现有影响。当地新生儿病房中严重脑损伤的婴儿比例显著更高(平均差异-0.011;99%置信区间-0.022至-0.001;P = 0.007),在27周出生的婴儿中平均差异最高(-0.040)。在出生后72小时内转运的婴儿更有可能发生严重脑损伤。对于妊娠27周的婴儿,在设有新生儿重症监护病房的中心出生可将严重脑损伤的风险从11.9%降低4.2%至7.7%。需治疗人数为25(99%置信区间10至59),这表明27周的25名婴儿必须在新生儿重症监护病房分娩才能预防1例严重脑损伤。对于妊娠27周出生的婴儿,在高容量病房(>160天/年重症监护天数)出生可将严重脑损伤的风险从0.242降至0.028[99%置信区间0.035至0.542;P = 0.003;需治疗人数 = 4(99%置信区间2至29)]。新生儿护理的估计年度总成本为£2.62亿。每个婴儿的平均(标准差)成本从27周时的£75594(£34874)到31周时的£27401(£14947)不等。对于妊娠27至2周出生的婴儿,新生儿重症监护病房和当地新生儿病房的成本相似,但对于30至31周出生的婴儿,当地新生儿病房的成本更高。在不同环境中未观察到挽救的额外生命有差异。这些结果表明,新生儿重症监护病房可能对国民医疗服务体系而言物有所值。然而,由于将极早产儿的新生儿护理从当地新生儿病房纯粹基于成本节约而重组到新生儿重症监护病房存在伦理和实际问题,因此应谨慎解读此结果。我们发现,基于对循证和共识性措施的依从性,高绩效单位的住院时间平均缩短(1天;95%置信区间1.029至1.081;P < 0.001)。工作人员报告说,优化婴儿护理能力的决策是他们工作的重要组成部分。家长报告说,他们重视婴儿的发育、回家、护理的连续性、参与决策以及对他们情感和身体健康的支持。

结论

在英格兰,妊娠≥28周的婴儿在新生儿重症监护病房和当地新生儿病房进行出生和早期护理都是安全的。对于预计在27周出生的情况,应支持将母亲产前转运至与新生儿重症监护病房同地的中心。当这些情况在设有当地新生儿病房的中心意外发生时,临床医生应在考虑患者护理需求、工作人员技能和医疗资源的情况下,对产后转运的决策进行风险评估,并就与转运相关的严重脑损伤风险增加向家长提供咨询。

研究注册

本研究注册为当前受控试验NCT02994849和ISRCTN74230187。

资助

本奖项由国家卫生与保健研究机构(NIHR)卫生与社会保健交付研究计划资助(NIHR奖项编号:15/70/104),并全文发表于;第13卷,第12期。有关进一步的奖项信息,请参阅NIHR资助与奖项网站。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验