Shea Michael, Longo Carolina, LeThanh Valentina, Vandepitte Natasja, Hemelaar Joris
John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 Apr 15;25(1):452. doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-07538-8.
Preterm birth is the most important cause of neonatal morbidity and mortality. Clinical guidelines recommend assessment of risk of preterm birth and implementation of interventions to reduce preterm birth risk through dedicated preterm birth clinics. We hypothesized that a two-tier preterm birth clinic pathway can safely manage women at the highest risk of preterm birth while reducing intervention for women at moderate risk of preterm birth. We aimed to test this hypothesis by evaluating risk factors, management, and outcomes of women attending a two-tier preterm birth prevention service.
We conducted a retrospective cohort study of women who gave birth between January and June 2021 at a tertiary hospital in Oxford, UK. We included two cohorts: women attending a Cervical Screening Clinic and women attending a Preterm Birth Clinic, and we also reviewed all cases of births before 34 weeks over that time period. At the initial midwife appointment at 8-10 weeks' gestation, risk factors for preterm birth were assessed. Pregnant women with moderate risk factors (previous preterm birth at 32 - 33 weeks, previous preterm prelabour rupture of membranes (PPROM) at 32 - 33 weeks, previous LLETZ / cone biopsy, known abnormal uterus, previous caesarean section at 10 cm dilatation, and multiple pregnancy) were referred to the Cervical Screening Clinic for a cervical length scan by a sonographer. Pregnant women with major risk factors (previous preterm birth at 16 - 31 weeks, previous PPROM at less than 32 weeks, radical trachelectomy, previous cervical cerclage) as well as those with a cervix < 25 mm at any scan were referred to the Preterm Birth Clinic for a cervical length scan and counselling by a specialist obstetrician. Detailed information on risk factors, management, and perinatal outcomes were collected from case notes and analysed.
189 women attended the Cervical Screening Clinic: 79.1% had a moderate risk factor for preterm birth, 100% had a cervical length scan, 7% had a short cervix and 4.2% received an intervention. All 196 infants were live born, with overall preterm birth rates of 14.8% at < 37 weeks, 3.1% at < 32 weeks, and 0% at < 28 weeks. The spontaneous live preterm birth rates were 9.7% at < 37 weeks, 2.6% at < 32 weeks and 0% at < 28 weeks. 79 women attended the Preterm Birth Clinic: 87.3% had a major risk factor for preterm birth, 100% had ≥ 1 cervical length scan, 41.3% had a short cervix, 78.1% received vaginal progesterone, and 39% had a cervical cerclage. Overall preterm birth rates were 33.8% at < 37 weeks, 10.3% at < 32 weeks and 4.4% at < 28 weeks. Spontaneous live preterm birth rates were 22.1% at < 37 weeks, 7.4% at < 32 weeks, and 2.9% at < 28 weeks. 115 women gave birth to 130 babies before 34 weeks: 80% had no major risk factor for preterm birth, 29% had a cervical length scan and less than 15% had an intervention. Over 90% had a live birth, but the neonatal death rate was high (8.5%).
Women with moderate risk factors for preterm birth seen in the Cervical Screening Clinic had low rates of intervention and good perinatal outcomes. Most women with major risk factors were appropriately referred and managed by the Preterm Birth Clinic. This two-tier preterm birth prevention service therefore appears safe and effective.
早产是新生儿发病和死亡的最重要原因。临床指南建议评估早产风险,并通过专门的早产诊所实施干预措施以降低早产风险。我们假设两级早产诊所路径可以安全地管理早产风险最高的女性,同时减少对中度早产风险女性的干预。我们旨在通过评估参加两级早产预防服务的女性的风险因素、管理情况和结局来验证这一假设。
我们对2021年1月至6月在英国牛津一家三级医院分娩的女性进行了一项回顾性队列研究。我们纳入了两个队列:参加宫颈筛查诊所(Cervical Screening Clinic)的女性和参加早产诊所(Preterm Birth Clinic)的女性,并且我们还回顾了该时间段内所有孕周小于34周的分娩病例。在妊娠8 - 10周首次与助产士预约时,评估早产风险因素。具有中度风险因素(既往32 - 33周早产、既往32 - 33周胎膜早破(PPROM)、既往大环状电切术/宫颈锥切活检、已知子宫异常、既往宫颈扩张至10厘米时行剖宫产、多胎妊娠)的孕妇被转诊至宫颈筛查诊所,由超声检查人员进行宫颈长度扫描。具有主要风险因素(既往16 - 31周早产、既往小于32周胎膜早破、根治性宫颈切除术、既往宫颈环扎术)以及任何一次扫描时宫颈长度小于25毫米的孕妇被转诊至早产诊所,由专科产科医生进行宫颈长度扫描并提供咨询。从病例记录中收集有关风险因素、管理情况和围产期结局的详细信息并进行分析。
189名女性参加了宫颈筛查诊所:79.1%有早产的中度风险因素,100%进行了宫颈长度扫描,7%宫颈短,4.2%接受了干预。所有196名婴儿均存活出生,孕周小于37周的总体早产率为14.8%,小于32周的为3.1%,小于28周的为0%。自发存活早产率在小于37周时为9.7%,小于32周时为2.6%,小于28周时为0%。79名女性参加了早产诊所:87.3%有早产的主要风险因素,100%进行了≥1次宫颈长度扫描,41.3%宫颈短,78.1%接受了阴道孕激素治疗,39%进行了宫颈环扎术。孕周小于37周的总体早产率为33.8%,小于32周的为10.3%,小于28周的为4.4%。自发存活早产率在小于37周时为22.1%,小于32周时为7.4%,小于28周时为2.9%。115名女性在34周前分娩了130名婴儿:80%没有早产的主要风险因素,29%进行了宫颈长度扫描,不到15%接受了干预。超过90%的婴儿存活出生,但新生儿死亡率较高(8.5%)。
在宫颈筛查诊所就诊的有早产中度风险因素的女性干预率低,围产期结局良好。大多数有主要风险因素的女性被适当地转诊至早产诊所并得到管理。因此,这种两级早产预防服务似乎是安全有效的。