Gardi Adam, Rodriguez Kazandra M, Augenstein Thomas E, Palmieri-Smith Riann M, Krishnan Chandramouli
Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Neuromuscular & Rehabilitation Robotics Laboratory (NeuRRo Lab), Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2024 Nov;42(3-4):231-241. doi: 10.1177/09226028251330850. Epub 2025 Apr 16.
BackgroundThe excitability of the corticospinal tract ( corticospinal excitability) is a valuable tool for assessing neurophysiology and the effectiveness of interventions in individuals with and without neurological and/or orthopaedic injuries. Corticospinal excitability is often measured with an input-output recruitment curve, which is produced by stimulating the motor cortex via transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) at several intensities and measuring the changes in the evoked responses. However, it is currently unclear if hysteresis in motor evoked potentials (MEPs) ( changes in MEP amplitude due to the order of stimulus intensities) affects the resulting measure of excitability, particularly in lower extremity muscles.ObjectiveTo evaluate whether the order of stimulus intensity (ascending, descending, randomized) affects input-output recruitment curves measured in the lower extremity muscles.MethodsRecruitment curves were produced in neurologically intact individuals by stimulating the primary motor cortex at 70% to 140% of active motor threshold in 10% increments. We examined three stimulus intensity ordering paradigms: ascending (70140), descending (14070), and randomized. We measured MEPs of the quadriceps and the antagonistic hamstring muscles using surface electromyography in addition to quadriceps motor evoked torque. We computed the area under the recruitment curve (AUC) of the raw and normalized motor evoked responses and used classical and Bayesian inference methods to comprehensively evaluate hysteresis in MEPs.ResultsClassical hypothesis testing revealed no significant main effects of stimulus order. Bayesian analyses also confirmed that the null model was more favored than the main effects model.ConclusionsCorticospinal excitability of the quadriceps and antagonistic hamstring muscles were not influenced by stimulus intensity order. Any of the three approaches (ascending, descending, randomized) may be used when measuring recruitment curves for the quadriceps and hamstring muscles.
背景
皮质脊髓束兴奋性(皮质脊髓兴奋性)是评估神经生理学以及对有无神经和/或骨科损伤个体进行干预效果的重要工具。皮质脊髓兴奋性通常通过输入-输出募集曲线来测量,该曲线通过经颅磁刺激(TMS)以几种强度刺激运动皮层并测量诱发反应的变化来产生。然而,目前尚不清楚运动诱发电位(MEP)中的滞后现象(由于刺激强度顺序导致的MEP幅度变化)是否会影响最终的兴奋性测量结果,尤其是在下肢肌肉中。
目的
评估刺激强度顺序(递增、递减、随机)是否会影响在下肢肌肉中测量的输入-输出募集曲线。
方法
在神经功能正常的个体中,通过以10%的增量将初级运动皮层刺激到主动运动阈值的70%至140%来产生募集曲线。我们研究了三种刺激强度排序范式:递增(70-140)、递减(140-70)和随机。除了股四头肌运动诱发扭矩外,我们还使用表面肌电图测量了股四头肌和拮抗肌腘绳肌的MEP。我们计算了原始和标准化运动诱发反应的募集曲线下面积(AUC),并使用经典和贝叶斯推理方法全面评估MEP中的滞后现象。
结果
经典假设检验显示刺激顺序没有显著的主效应。贝叶斯分析也证实了零模型比主效应模型更受青睐。
结论
股四头肌和拮抗肌腘绳肌的皮质脊髓兴奋性不受刺激强度顺序的影响。在测量股四头肌和腘绳肌的募集曲线时,可以使用三种方法中的任何一种(递增、递减、随机)。