Smith Cathy, Perkins Ol, Mistry Jayalaxshmi, Bilbao Bibiana A, Bliege Bird Rebecca, Cardinal Christianson Amy, de Freitas Kayla Maria, Dressler Wolfram, Ellis Erle C, Eloy Ludivine, Fowler Cynthia, Haberle Simon, Kaplan Jed O, Laris Paul, Millington James, Monzón-Alvarado Claudia
Department of Geography, Royal Holloway University of London, Egham, UK.
Leverhulme Centre for Wildfires, Environment and Society, London, UK.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2025 Apr;380(1924):20230463. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2023.0463. Epub 2025 Apr 17.
Human fire use contributes to fire regimes and benefits societies worldwide yet is poorly understood at the global scale. We present the Global Fire Use Survey (GFUS), an effort to elicit and systematize knowledge about fire use from experts, including academics and practitioners. The GFUS data cover the stakeholders using fire, reasons for and seasonality of burning, recent trends in anthropogenic ignitions and burned area and the presence/absence and effectiveness of different policy interventions targeting fire use. The survey garnered 311 responses for regions covering over 50% of the Earth's ice-free land, improving on the coverage of literature syntheses on fire use. Here, we analyse the data on the distribution of fire use and policy interventions. The survey suggests that the most widespread fire users are Indigenous and local people burning to meet objectives associated with small-scale livelihoods and cultural priorities, whereas burning by commercial land users, state agencies and non-governmental organizations is less widespread. Regulatory restrictions are the most common policy interventions targeting fire use but are ineffective in achieving their aims in regions with higher burned area. While community-led governance of burning is rarer, it was deemed more effective than restrictive policy interventions, particularly in regions with higher burned area.This article is part of the theme issue 'Novel fire regimes under climate changes and human influences: impacts, ecosystem responses and feedbacks'.
人类用火影响着火灾格局,造福全球社会,但在全球范围内却鲜为人知。我们开展了全球用火调查(GFUS),旨在从包括学者和从业者在内的专家那里获取并系统化关于用火的知识。GFUS数据涵盖了用火的利益相关者、燃烧的原因和季节性、人为点火和过火面积的近期趋势,以及针对用火的不同政策干预措施的有无和有效性。该调查获得了覆盖地球无冰陆地面积超过50%地区的311份回复,比用火文献综述的覆盖范围有所改善。在此,我们分析用火分布和政策干预的数据。调查表明,最广泛的用火者是为实现与小规模生计和文化优先事项相关目标而用火的原住民和当地人,而商业土地使用者、国家机构和非政府组织的用火则不那么普遍。监管限制是针对用火最常见的政策干预措施,但在过火面积较大的地区,这些措施在实现其目标方面效果不佳。虽然由社区主导的用火治理较为少见,但它被认为比限制性政策干预更有效,尤其是在过火面积较大的地区。本文是主题为“气候变化和人类影响下的新型火灾格局:影响、生态系统响应和反馈”的一部分。