Weems Jacy A, Wittenberg Grace F, Baier Rosa R, Reddy Ann, McCreedy Ellen
Department of Health Services, Policy & Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.
Center for Long-Term Care Quality & Innovation, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.
Gerontologist. 2025 May 10;65(6). doi: 10.1093/geront/gnaf128.
To describe factors affecting nursing home adherence in an embedded pragmatic randomized controlled trial of a personalized music intervention to manage agitation in residents living with dementia.
Semistructured qualitative interviews with 4 corporate leaders and 27 nursing home staff. We used thematic analysis to develop a codebook and map findings to potential adherence moderators in the Conceptual Framework for Implementation Fidelity (CFIF): recruitment, participant responsiveness, strategies to facilitate implementation, intervention complexity, quality of delivery, and context.
Recruitment: Corporate leaders noted research participation compensation did support corporate implementation. Resident turnover frequently occurred and led to delays in implementation due to the need to personalize music to each resident. Participant responsiveness (dose received): Interviewees noted the intervention improved dementia behaviors and enhanced engagement with exceptions. Strategies to facilitate implementation: Interviewees voiced differing views on whether nurses or activities staff should lead implementation and how to pilot the program. Intervention complexity: Interviewees described complexities including tailoring delivery to each resident, updating music, and sustainability concerns. Quality of delivery: Champions discussed protocol deviations; for example, providing residents with music that was not personalized. Context: Interviewees noted how the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic exacerbated turnover, but the intervention did engage residents during staffing shortages.
Interviewees described contextual barriers associated with pragmatic implementation of a personalized music intervention. While they also described facilitators, our findings highlight limits to pragmatic delivery in nursing homes with chronic under-resourcing and staffing, exacerbated by the pandemic.
在一项针对痴呆症患者躁动管理的个性化音乐干预嵌入式实用随机对照试验中,描述影响疗养院依从性的因素。
对4名企业领导人和27名疗养院工作人员进行半结构化定性访谈。我们采用主题分析法制定了一个编码手册,并将研究结果映射到实施保真度概念框架(CFIF)中潜在的依从性调节因素上:招募、参与者反应性、促进实施的策略、干预复杂性、实施质量和背景。
招募:企业领导人指出,研究参与补偿确实支持企业层面的实施。居民流动频繁发生,由于需要为每位居民个性化定制音乐,导致实施延迟。参与者反应性(接受的剂量):受访者指出,干预改善了痴呆症患者的行为,并增强了参与度,但有例外情况。促进实施的策略:受访者对于应由护士还是活动工作人员领导实施以及如何试点该项目表达了不同观点。干预复杂性:受访者描述了一些复杂性,包括根据每位居民的情况调整音乐、更新音乐以及可持续性问题。实施质量:支持者讨论了方案偏差;例如,为居民提供非个性化的音乐。背景:受访者指出,SARS-CoV-2大流行加剧了人员流动,但在人员短缺期间,该干预措施确实让居民参与了进来。
受访者描述了与个性化音乐干预实用实施相关的背景障碍。虽然他们也描述了促进因素,但我们的研究结果凸显了在资源长期不足和人员配备不足的疗养院中实用实施的局限性,而大流行加剧了这种情况。